|Table of Contents|

Study on Drought Resistance of Four Species of Salvia officinalis

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年7
Page:
43-49
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Study on Drought Resistance of Four Species of Salvia officinalis
Author(s):
HAN Rong; ZHANG Tian; LIU Xiaojuan
（College of Foresty，Gansu Agricultural University，Lanzhou，Gansu 730070）
Keywords:
garden plant; Salvia; drought stress; physiological index
PACS:
S 688.4
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20233454
Abstract:
Taking annual Salvia viridis,Salvia farinaceae,Salvia coccina,and Salvia nemorosa L.seedlings as test materials,the relative water content,total chlorophyll (a+b) content,malondialdehyde (MDA) content,and superoxide dismutase (SOD) content of leaves under specific conditions were studied by using a slow drought method,in order to provide reference for the introduction,cultivation,and ecological adaptability of Salvia in Lanzhou.The results showed that the changes of drought-resistant physiological indexes of the four species of Salvia officinalis were not completely consistent,the relative water content and total chlorophyll content of leaves showed an overall decreasing trend;CAT activity showed an increasing trend;and the MDA content and SOD,POD activity showed a trend of rising and then decreasing.Using the fuzzy mathematical affiliation function method to evaluate the drought resistance of four species of Salvia officinalis,the order of drought resistance was as follows Salvia viridis>Salvia coccinea>Salvia farinacea>Salvia nemorosa L.

References:

［1］LI H W,HEDGE I C.Lamiaceae ［M］// WU Z Y,RAVEN P H.Flora of China.Beijing:Science Press & St;Louis:Missouri Botanical Garden,1994.［2］魏宇昆，王琦，黄艳波．唇形科鼠尾草属的物种多样性与分布［J］．生物多样性，2015，23(1) : 3-10． ［3］常宇航,魏宇昆,马永鹏,等.中国原生鼠尾草属植物园林应用现状与展望［J］.西部林业科学,2020,49(5):37-41,53.［4］陈云,肖汉文,黄艳波,等.高温高湿胁迫对鼠尾草属5种植物生理特性的影响［J］.热带亚热带植物学报,2023,31(6): 845-852.［5］吴秋花,吴雪梅,吴家森,等.花菖蒲等3种鸢尾属湿地植物抗旱性研究［J］.安徽农业科学,2007,35(12):3481,3492.［6］周源.七种鸢尾的抗旱性研究［D］.乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2006.［7］李燕,孙明高,孔艳菊,等.皂角苗木对干旱胁迫的生理生化反应［J］.华南农业大学学报,2006,27(3):66-69.［8］赵丽娟.5种鼠尾草的光合生理特性及耐旱性研究［D］.杭州:浙江农林大学,2010.［9］沈艳,兰剑.干旱胁迫下苜蓿抗旱性参数动态研究［J］.农业科学研究,2006,27(3):21-23,30.［10］张文辉,段宝利,周建云,等.不同种源栓皮栎幼苗水分适应及耐旱特性比较研究［J］.西北植物学报,2003,23(5):728-734.［11］王莺璇.7种百合科园林地被植物的抗旱性研究［D］.昆明:云南农业大学,2012.［12］赵燕燕.鸢尾属几种植物的抗旱性研究［D］.南京:南京林业大学,2007.［13］李云霞.五种园林地被植物抗旱性初步研究［D］.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2009.［14］王兰兰.兰州城区园林地被植物资源调查［J］.甘肃林业科技,2013,38(2):34-37.［15］任学昌.兰州城市生态系统研究［D］.成都:西南交通大学,2002.［16］张祖群,李敏,赵荣,等.近年来我国地被植物研究进展及述评［J］.湖北农学院学报,2004(4):267-271.［17］杨阳,张凤,蔡飞,等.甘西鼠尾草化学成分及药理作用研究进展［J］.中药材,2008,31(5):787-790.［18］曹丽敏.鼠尾草属植物研究进展［J］.湖南农业科学,2009(3):137-139,147.［19］沙红,廖康.药用鼠尾草的组织培养研究［J］.新疆农业大学学报,2006,29(4):53-55.［20］马志刚,杨永建,谢鋆,等.甘肃鼠尾草属五种植物根的生药鉴定［J］.兰州医学院学报,1993,19(4):212-214.［21］史彦斌,薛明,崔颖,等.鼠尾草属植物化学成分及生物活性研究进展［J］.国外医药(植物药分册),1999,14(5):198-201.［22］薄伟,王松,康红梅，等.太原市五种园林地被植物抗旱性评价及抗旱指标筛选［J］.北方园艺,2021(15):65-72.［23］杜中军,翟衡,潘志勇,等.盐胁迫下苹果砧木光合能力及光合色素的变化［J］.果树学报,2001,18(4):200-203.［24］孙福贵,刘学圣.作物抗旱性鉴定指标的研究［J］.安徽农业科学,2009,37(26):12494-12495.［25］李桂伶,范继红,胡斌,等.几种彩叶植物抗性生理指标的比较研究［J］.北方园艺,2011(14):72-74.［26］王彩华,宋连天.模糊论方法论［M］.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1988.［27］张鸭关,吴丽芳,刘品华,等.4个紫花苜蓿品种幼苗抗旱性的模糊隶属函数分析［J］.江苏农业科学,2010,38(6):349-352.［28］郭运雪.3种金鸡菊的光合生理特性及抗旱性研究［D］.杭州:浙江农林大学,2012.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-05-09