|Table of Contents|

Growth and Physiological Responses to Alkali Stress and Alkali Tolerance Evaluation of Four Rhododendron Cultivars

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年16
Page:
58-63
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Growth and Physiological Responses to Alkali Stress and Alkali Tolerance Evaluation of Four Rhododendron Cultivars
Author(s):
PENG Lyuchun1; GE Baozhi2; LI Xuejiao2; SONG Jie1; ZHANG Lu1; LI Shifeng1
(1.Flower Research Institute,Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Research Center for Ornamental Horticulture/Yunnan Flower Breeding Key Laboratory/Yunnan Flower Research and Development Center,Kunming,Yunnan 650205;2.School of Garden and Horticulture,Yunnan Agricultural University,Kunming,Yunnan 650201)
Keywords:
Rhododendron; cultivar; alkali resistance; morphological indicators; physiological indicators
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20230093
Abstract:
Taking the tube seedlings of four Rhododendron cultivars ‘Cosmopolitan’‘Lord Roberts’‘Scintillation’ and ‘Polaris’ as test materials，the effects of five pH levels of culture media on the growth of test tube seedlings of Rhododendron were studied by using the method of alkaline tolerance evaluation in vitro，through observation of morphological indicators(alkaline damage index，plant height growth，bud proliferation number) and determination of physiological indicators(soluble sugar content，superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity)，in order to provide reference for indoor evaluation of alkaline resistance of Rhododendrons.The results showed that among the four Rhododendron cultivars,‘Cosmopolitan’ had the strongest alkali resistance with an alkali damage index of 13 at pH 8.9,it′s plant height growth was significantly higher than other treatments at pH 8.1; next was ‘Lord Roberts’,with an alkali damage index of 62 at pH 8.9 and a significantly higher plant height growth at pH 4.8 and 7.0 compared to other treatments;‘Scintillation’ and ‘Polaris’ were the least alkali resistant,with an alkali damage index of 97 and 100 at pH 8.9,respectively. Except for the treatment of pH 8.9,there was no significant difference in bud proliferation coefficient for the same variety at other pH levels. At pH 7.0,the SOD activity of ‘Cosmopolitan’ and ‘Polaris’ began to significantly decrease,while at pH 5.9,the activity of SOD began to significantly decrease in ‘Scintillation’,since pH 8.1,the SOD activity of ‘Lord Roberts’ had been significantly lower than at pH 4.8 and 5.9. Four Rhododendron cultivars have the highest soluble sugar content in response to increasing alkaline stress at pH 8.1-8.9.

References:

[1]解玮佳,王继华,卢红春,等.21个高山杜鹃引进品种的亲本分析[J].河南农业大学学报,2015,49(5):622-627.[2]江泽慧,林斌. 中国杜鹃花[M].北京: 中国林业出版社,2008.[3]张杰,黄军华,顾海燕,等.盆栽基质pH调节及其对杜鹃花生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2017(21):94-100.[4]岳媛,耿兴敏.贮藏温度及不同pH值、栽培基质等对杜鹃种子发芽的影响[J].种子,2013,32(4):37-44.[5]刘杰.向日葵对碱胁迫和盐胁迫适应机制比较[D].吉林:东北师范大学，2011.[6]路旭平,李芳兰,石亚飞，等.不同水稻品种幼苗响应碱胁迫的生理差异及胁迫等级构建[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(8):1757-1768.[7]张璐,杨帆,王志春.碱化对土壤性质和植物生理生态特征的影响[J].东北农业科学，2021,46(2):30-36.[8]徐娟,曹玉峰,田艳丽,等.不同pH值对兴安杜鹃及迎红杜鹃生理特性的影响[J].林业科技,2009,34(5):58-59.[9]周利华,聂立水,王百田,等.不同氮源和pH值对比利时杜鹃叶片生理特征和营养元素的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2008(6):30-35.[10]鲜小林,陈睿,秦帆,等.4个杜鹃品种对不同pH值灌溉水的生理响应[J].西北植物学报,2013,33(1):139-145.[11]李明银,张媚,陈娟.不同pH值对杜鹃插条成活的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2010(5):245-246.[12]陆娟娟.不同杜鹃品种耐碱能力比较研究[D].扬州:扬州大学,2018.[13]郁书君,陈锡明,李贞植.云锦杜鹃的耐碱反应[J].园艺学报,2008，35(5):715-720.[14]孙振元,徐文忠,刘淑兰,等.毛白杜鹃耐碱突变体的离体筛选与鉴定[J]. 中南林学院学报,2003(5):53-55.[15]彭绿春,解玮佳,贾红芬,等.两种高山杜鹃试管增殖和生根影响因子[J].西部林业科学,2015,44(6):61-65.[16]刘攀,耿兴敏,赵晖.碱胁迫下杜鹃花抗氧化体系的响应及亚细胞分布[J].园艺学报,2020,47(5):916-926.[17]刘攀,耿兴敏,宦智群,等.盐碱胁迫对4种杜鹃属植物种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国野生植物资源,2021,40(1):36-42.[18]陆开形.盐胁迫对大豆光合作用和抗氧化系统的影响及其调控机制[D].杭州:浙江大学,2008.[19]王晓宇,张艳娥,张林生.4种非生物胁迫下小麦幼苗表型及可溶性蛋白含量的变化[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018,36(2):113-117.[20]杨庆山,赵亚楠,张云,等. 中国柽柳幼苗叶片生理特性对碱胁迫的响应[J]. 中国农学通报,2018,34(7):48-52.[21]梁巧玲,赵鹏.西洋杜鹃组织培养影响因素分析[J].江苏农业科学,2010(2):58-59.[22]宦智群,耿兴敏.杜鹃花属植物组织培养技术研究进展[J]. 中国野生植物资源,2021,41(11):54-62.[23]PREIL W，EBBINGHAUS R.Breeding of lime tolerant Rhododendron rootstocks[J].Acta Horticulturae，1994，364：61-70.[24]颜宏,赵伟,尹尚军,等.羊草对不同盐碱胁迫的生理响应[J].草业学报,2006(6):49-55．[25]闫晶秋子,李钢铁,刘玉军,等.基于主成分分析及隶属函数法的巨菌草幼苗耐盐碱性评价[J].浙江农业学报,2019,31(9):1531-1540.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-09-27