|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Yield,Quality and Soil Properties of Continuous Cropping Pepper in Acidic Soil

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2026年1
Page:
96-105
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Yield,Quality and Soil Properties of Continuous Cropping Pepper in Acidic Soil
Author(s):
DONG Gaoyi12ZHANG Minmin12LI Jie2ZHENG Jingyuan12
(1.College of Horticulture,Hunan Agricultural University,Changsha,Hunan 410128;2.Institute of Hunan Vegetable Research,Changsha,Hunan 410125)
Keywords:
peppersoil conditioneryieldqualitycontinuous croppingsoil properties
PACS:
S641.3
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20252057
Abstract:
Taking the ‘Xingshu 208’ pepper variety as the test material,a field plot experiment method was adopted to set up three different soil conditioners,T1 (silicon calcium magnesium soil conditioner mainly made of dolomite and oyster shells),T2 (granules mainly made of oyster shell powder),and T3 (soil conditioner mainly made of calcium magnesium powder),CK (no application) was used as the control to measure the dynamic changes of pepper yield,quality,soil nutrients,and enzyme activity,in order to provide reference for screening suitable soil conditioners for acidification soil improvement caused by continuous cropping of peppers.The results showed that the application of soil conditioners could promote the growth and increase the yield of peppers to a certain extent,with a yield increase rate of 9.8% to 16.6%;improve the quality of peppers,especially the soluble protein,amino acids,and vitamin C content that can ripen the fruit;affect the photosynthetic characteristics of peppers,particularly significantly reducing the intercellular CO2 concentration and significantly increasing transpiration rate;significantly increase the soil pH during different growth and development stages of peppers,with an increase range of 0.19-0.70;affect the content of available potassium,alkali hydrolyzed nitrogen,organic matter,exchangeable calcium,and exchangeable magnesium in soil,with the most significant increase in exchangeable calcium and exchangeable magnesium content;improve the activities of soil catalase,urease,acid phosphatase,and sucrase,but T2 treatment has the highest enzyme activity.In summary,the application of soil conditioner could improve the physical and chemical properties of acidic soil,enhance the quality of peppers,and increase pepper yield.The best effect was achieved by applying 2 250 kg·hm-2 of oyster shell particle soil conditioner.

References:

[1]邹学校,朱凡.辣椒的起源、进化与栽培历史[J].园艺学报,2022,49(6):1371-1381.[2]彭月,吴永红,王俊莹,等.2021年辣椒科学若干领域重要研究进展[J].辣椒杂志,2022,20(1):1-11.[3]邹学校,马艳青,戴雄泽,等.辣椒在中国的传播与产业发展[J].园艺学报,2020,47(9):1715-1726.[4]王牧野,李建平,李俊杰.中国设施蔬菜历史演变、规模分布与区域布局[J].中国瓜菜,2020,33(7):86-89.[5]邹学校,杨莎,朱凡,等.中国高口感品质鲜食辣椒产业发展与未来趋势[J].园艺学报,2024,51(1):27-38.[6]牟舒敏,关月明,高晶霞,等.添加生物炭对连作辣椒生长及根系生理代谢和产量的影响[J].西北农业学报,2024,33(9):1667-1680.[7]GAO J,PEI H,XIE H.Synergistic effects of organic fertilizer and corn straw on microorganisms of pepper continuous cropping soil in China[J].Bioengineered,2020,11(1):1258-1268.[8]索琳娜,马杰,刘宝存,等.土壤调理剂应用现状及施用风险研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2021,40(6):1141-1149.[9]ZHANG J,YE L,CHANG J,et al.Straw soil conditioner modulates key soil microbes and nutrient dynamics across different maize developmental stages[J].Microorganisms,2024,12(2):295.[10]王莉莉,谭军利,陈欣,等.土壤调理剂对盐碱地土壤盐分、pH及麒麟西瓜产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2024,42(4):145-154.[11]XUE D,WANG Y,SUN H,et al.Effects of soil conditioner (volcanic ash) on yield quality and rhizosphere soil characteristics of melon[J].Plants,2024,13(13):1787.[12]李晨昱,卢树昌,王茜.土壤调理剂在农业领域研究现状、问题及前景[J].北方园艺,2018(14):154-160.[13]刘亚军,胡启国,王文静,等.生物有机肥以及钙镁硅型土壤调理剂对甘薯连作田土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳含量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2025,41(1):51-60.[14]常健玮,刘国群,颜雯婷,等.牡蛎壳粉替代石灰对橘园土壤酸化改良及果实品质的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2024(10):136-141.[15]柳文娜,李艳玲,刘鹏,等.生化腐植酸的制备与应用研究进展[J].腐植酸,2024(4):7-22.[16] 关松萌.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1986.[17]CUI H,ZHANG J D,BAO L,et al.Effects of different amounts of organic acid soil conditioners on soil nutrients and crop growth[J].The Journal of Applied Ecology,2021,32(12):4411-4418.[18]黄洁雪,王晓琳,邬劼,等.化肥减施配施土壤调理剂对草莓品质和土壤养分的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2024,40(1):55-63.[19]孟健.腐殖酸肥料在农业生产中的应用进展[J].新农业,2024(12):60-61.[20]王文英,刘喜存,霍建中,等.不同含量土壤调理剂对重茬地西瓜产量和土壤化学性质的影响[J].中国瓜菜,2023,36(1):67-71.[21]窦昂洋,程艳,杨倩,等.土壤调理剂对生姜硒镉积累和品质安全的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2024,43(6):1239-1249.[22]栗方亮,张青,王煌平,等.土壤调理剂对蜜柚产量、品质及土壤性状的影响[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(6):39-44.[23]毛家伟,杨永辉,张运红,等.复合肥中添加不同比例腐殖酸对花生产量、品质及氮磷利用效率的影响[J].花生学报,2025,54(1):44-51.[24]陈晓莉,杨宏羽,韩佳,等.化肥减量配施微生物菌肥对兰州百合光合生理特性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2024,44(9):1365-1375.[25]吴小丹,高丽,巩天耕,等.微生物菌肥和腐植酸复合肥对百合生长和光合特性的影响[J].中国农业科技导报(中英文),2025,27(4):221-229.[26]张晓伟,李鹏飞,邱学礼,等.镁、硼、氯肥配施土壤调理剂对烤烟光合特性及产质量的影响[J].西南农业学报,2023,36(2):314-320.[27]谢田玲,沈禹颖,邵新庆,等.黄土高原4种豆科牧草的净光合速率和蒸腾速率日动态及水分利用效率[J].生态学报,2004,24(8):1679-1686.[28]张福建.江西省设施辣椒连作障碍现状调查及缓解技术的研究[D].南昌:江西农业大学,2018.[29]YU X,ZHANG Y,SHEN M,et al.Soil conditioner affects tobacco rhizosphere soil microecology[J].Microbial Ecology,2023,86(1):460-473.[30]杨羽.不同土壤调理剂对土壤改良及冬瓜产量的影响[J].现代农业科技,2024(11):65-67.[31]邵代兴,罗元琼,吴正肖,等.不同土壤改良剂对酸性土壤的改良效果[J].现代农业科技,2024(5):111-114,125.[32]朱慧,何颖悦.不同土壤调理剂配施对连作番茄土壤特性和产量与果实品质的影响[J].中国瓜菜,2023,36(5):104-108.[33]YANG L L,XIE Z X,ZHU X M,et al.Effects of biochar and soil conditioner on coastal barren saline-alkali soil[J].Huanjing Kexue,2023,44(10):5641-5648.[34]张福建,姚文武.生物炭和腐植酸对唐菖蒲生长及根际土壤环境的影响[J].核农学报,2024,38(11):2211-2218.[35]韩剑宏,孙一博,张连科,等.生物炭与腐殖酸配施对盐碱土理化性质的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2020,38(6):121-127.[36]刘亚军,逯昀,王文静,等.有机肥与土壤调理剂对连作甘薯生长发育及土壤肥力的影响[J].作物杂志,2024(3):168-174.[37]谢仕祺,林正全,陈玉蓝,等.不同土壤调理剂对植烟土壤养分及细菌群落的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2021,55(3):523-530.[38]LIU Y,GAO L,WANG C,et al.Biochar combined with humic acid improves the soil environment and regulate microbial communities in apple replant soil[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2024,283:116958.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2026-01-16