|Table of Contents|

Investigating the Morphological and Physiological Mechanisms Responsible for Stem Brittleness in Dahlia

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2026年2
Page:
53-62
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Investigating the Morphological and Physiological Mechanisms Responsible for Stem Brittleness in Dahlia
Author(s):
WANG Ying1SHI Yibing1ZHAO Yange2HAO Lihong1NIU Shance1XIANG Diying1
(1.College of Horticulture,Hebei Agricultural University,Baoding,Hebei 071000;2.Zhangjiakou Academy of Agricultural Sciences of Hebei Province,Zhangjiakou,Hebei 075000)
Keywords:
dahliastem strengthflexural resistancecell wall components
PACS:
S682.261
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20251832
Abstract:
Taking the dahlia varieties ‘Ferncilff Illusion’ and ‘Pinelands Princess’ as experimental materials,the stems morphological characteristics and cell wall chemical components at different developmental stages were investigated through solar greenhouse cultivation,and the key indexes affecting the bending resistance of dahlia stems were explored,in order to provide reference for improving the strength of dahlia stems.The results showed that the bending resistance of ‘Ferncilff Illusion’ was significantly higher than that of ‘Pinelands Princess’ at three developmental stages (P<0.01).‘Ferncilff Illusion’ had thicker stems,shorter internodes,greater stem wall thickness,larger vascular bundle area and higher contents of lignin and cellulose,while lower contents of soluble pectin conten than that of ‘Pinelands Princess’.In conclusion,stem morphological characteristics (such as stem diameter,internode length,stem wall thickness and vascular bundle structure) and cell wall components (such as lignin,cellulose and soluble pectin content) were important factors affecting the bending resistance of dahlia stem.

References:

[1]田松青,袁茹优,韦庆华,等.大丽花‘费罗加’组织培养和块根诱导[J].北方园艺,2020(7):79-85.[2]段善德,贾音,赵艺宁,等.大丽花种质资源及利用的研究进展[J/OL].分子植物育种,(2025-11-22)[2025-12-12].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20231225.1103.006.[3]吕长平,陈海霞,陈晨甜.切花非洲菊花茎解剖构造对瓶插寿命的影响研究[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(31):99-104.[4]ZHAO D,SHI W,XIA X,et al.Microstructural and lignin characteristics in herbaceous peony cultivars with different stem strengths[J].Postharvest Biology and Technology,2020,159:111043.[5]丰光,刘志芳,吴宇锦,等.玉米抗倒性与茎秆穿刺力和拉力关系的初步研究[J].玉米科学,2010,18(6):19-23.[6]DUAN C,WANG B,WANG P,et al.Relationship between the minute structure and the lodging resistance of rice stems[J].Colloids and Surfaces B:Biointerfaces,2004,35(3/4):155-158.[7]LIU Z,XIAO T,PENG G,et al.Microstructure evidence of rice lodging resistance based on quantitative X-ray microtomography[J].Agronomy Journal,2021,113(2):2165-2174.[8]罗晓雨.‘小白杏’实生优株鉴定及组培快繁体系的研究[D].阿拉尔:塔里木大学,2024.[9]张文博,贺建龙,蒋浩,等.木质纤维物质中纤维素和半纤维素含量的测定[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(5):281-284.[10]李春明,管春梅.咔唑比色法测定玉米种皮中的果胶含量[J].中国公共卫生,2004,20(4):490.[11]次旦卓嘎,赵爱宣,刘倩倩,等.青稞茎秆形态特性与抗倒伏性的关系[J].湖北农业科学,2022,61(8):24-28.[12]南铭,王兴荣,李晶,等.燕麦抗倒伏性状的基因型差异[J].草业学报,2023,32(11):106-118.[13]李成忠.影响芍药花茎机械强度的生理机制研究[D].扬州:扬州大学,2013.[14]过聪,程文翰,陈锋,等.切花多头菊品种茎枝数量性状比较与因子分析[J].北方园艺,2024(14):59-66.[15]杨雪峰,宋维富,刘东军,等.小麦茎秆强度研究进展[J].黑龙江农业科学,2022(7):106-109.[16]YANG Y,MU J,HAO X,et al.Identification and analysis of the mechanism of stem mechanical strength enhancement for maize inbred lines QY1[J].International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2024,25(15):8195.[17]夏星,汤寓涵,陶俊,等.观赏植物茎秆强度形成及其调控[J].植物生理学报,2018,54(3):347-354.[18]HUSSAIN S,IQBAL N,RAHMAN T,et al.Shade effect on carbohydrates dynamics and stem strength of soybean genotypes[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany,2019,162:374-382.[19]LI Q,NIE S,LI G,et al.Identification and fine mapping of the recessive gene BK-5,which affects cell wall biosynthesis and plant brittleness in maize[J].International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2022,23(2):814.[20]柴孟竹,李钊,秦东玲,等.乙烯利对玉米茎秆抗倒伏性的调控效应[J].玉米科学,2017,25(6):63-72.[21]CAFFALL K H,MOHNEN D.The structure,function,and biosynthesis of plant cell wall pectic polysaccharides[J].Carbohydrate Research,2009,344(14):1879-1900.[22]武杰瑞.紫花苜蓿茎秆不同发育阶段形态特征和转录组学分析[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2023.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2026-02-03