|Table of Contents|

Effects of the Quantities of Culture Medium and Strain on the Yield and Quality of Stropharia rugosoannulata in North China

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2026年2
Page:
78-85
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of the Quantities of Culture Medium and Strain on the Yield and Quality of Stropharia rugosoannulata in North China
Author(s):
LIU Gaoyuan1; HE Ailing1; WANG Chunlan1; PAN Xiuyan2; ZHANG Yanan3; KONG Weili3
(1.Institute of Plant Nutrition，Resource and Environment，Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Zhengzhou，Henan 450002；2.Institute of Agricultural Sciences of Suiping，Zhumadian，Henan 463100；3.Institute of Edible Fungi，Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Zhengzhou，Henan 450002)
Keywords:
Stropharia rugosoannulata; high-efficiency cultivation; maize straw; maize cob; culture medium
PACS:
S646
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20251774
Abstract:
Taking Stropharia rugosoannulata (S.rugosoannulata) as the experimental material，the effects in yield and quality of mechanisms by which substrate application rates (5 000，7 500，10 000 kg·(667m2)-1) and inoculum rates (100，200，and 300 kg·(667m2)-1) were studied,and the influencing mechanisms were also investigated,in order to provide reference for enhancing the yield and quality of S.rugosoannulata in North China.The results showed that compared to other treatments，both the strain application rates of 200 and 300 kg·(667m2)-1 under a culture medium application rate of 7 500 kg·(667m2)-1 significantly enhanced the yield and biological efficiency of S.rugosoannulata.Specifically，the yield increased by 39.4% to 185.7% and 43.3% to 193.8%，while the biological efficiency improved by 1.39 to 3.57 times and 1.43 to 3.68 times，respectively.The two treatments exhibited significantly higher contents of crude protein and crude fiber in the fruit bodies compared to other treatments，except for the treatment with the culture medium rate of 10 000 kg·(667m2)-1 and the strain rate of 300 kg·(667m2)-1.Specifically，the crude protein content increased by 20.9% to 44.6% and 16.8% to 39.7%，while the crude fiber content rose by 15.3% to 36.5% and 12.8% to 33.6%，respectively.The findings from the analyses of two-way ANOVA and structural equation modeling indicate that both the quantities of culture medium and strain significantly influence yield.Additionally，the quantity of strain exerts a notable impact on the crude protein and crude fiber content of the fruit bodies.This effect was primarily mediated through direct or indirect regulation of substrate moisture content，C/N ratio，and lignocellulose composition.

References:

［1］李玉．食用菌在构建粮食安全大格局中的作用：践行“大食物观” 探讨食用菌产业发展途径主题报告［J］．菌物研究，2022，20(3)：157-159．［2］YUAN S，HUANG C，GAO W．Unlocking the potential of edible mushroom proteins：A sustainable future in food and health［J］．Food Chemistry，2025，481：144026．［3］XUE S，LU Q，YANG D，et al．Adaptation to appropriate sub-freezing temperatures through reduction of mycelial porosity and alteration of cell wall composition in Stropharia rugosoannulata［J］．Postharvest Biology and Technology，2024，216：113064．［4］边银丙．食用菌栽培学［M］.3版．北京：高等教育出版社，2017．［5］中国食用菌协会.2023年度全国食用菌统计调查结果分析［J］.中国食用菌，2025，44(1)：120-129.［6］HU Q，YANG J，CHEN Z，et al．Rice-edible mushroom Stropharia rugosoannulata rotation mitigates net global warming potential while enhancing soil fertility and economic benefits［J］．European Journal of Agronomy，2025，164：127521．［7］高鹏，雷星宇，文炯，等．不同栽培料配比对大球盖菇生长和品质的影响［J］．农业科学与技术(英文版)，2023，24(4)：30-34．［8］高敏，尚学钰，王子璇，等．不同栽培基质大球盖菇子实体多糖化学组成及抗氧化活性相关性研究［J］.北方园艺，2023(10)：121-128．［9］吴应齐，应国华，薛振文，等．穇子秸秆栽培大球盖菇培养料配方筛选初报［J］．南方林业科学，2018，46(1)：54-56，59．［10］彭瑞雪，程艳，宋娜，等．水稻-大球盖菇模式对土壤微生物量碳氮磷的影响［J］.中国土壤与肥料，2024(7)：49-59．［11］刘高远，和爱玲，杜君，等．大球盖菇：玉米轮作对秸秆降解、土壤理化性质、作物产量及经济效益的影响［J］．河南农业科学，2021，50(10)：60-68．［12］许彬，李慧星，郭书贤，等．玉米秸秆培养大球盖菇栽培种配方比较［J］．食用菌，2019，41(1)：32-34，38．［13］中华全国供销合作总社．大球盖菇生产技术规程：GH/T 1437—2023［S］．北京：中国标准出版社，2023．［14］曹雪梅．富硒稻草对大球盖菇产量、品质和硒含量的影响［D］．武汉：华中农业大学，2023．［15］国家市场监督管理总局，国家标准化管理委员会．饲料中粗纤维的含量测定：GB/T 6434—2022［S］．北京：中国标准出版社，2022．［16］国家市场监督管理总局，国家标准化管理委员会．饲料中粗脂肪的测定：GB/T 6433—2025［S］．北京：中国标准出版社，2025．［17］GUO Y X，CHEN Q J，QIN Y，et al．Succession of the microbial communities and function prediction during short-term peach sawdust-based composting［J］．Bioresource Technology，2021，332：125079．［18］鲍士旦．土壤农化分析［M］.3版．北京：中国农业出版社，2000．［19］AMARESAN N,SETHIL K M,ANNAPURNA K，et al．Beneficial Microbes in Agro-Ecology［M］．New York：Academic Press，2020．［20］李春玲，万吉庆，方梦琦，等．西北寒旱区大球盖菇露天高产栽培技术［J］．中国蔬菜，2024(11)：139-142．［21］杨俊，卢华丽，卢华平，等．湖北黄冈地区大球盖菇-水稻轮作发展现状与对策［J］．食药用菌，2024，32(1)：18-22．［22］闫静，林佳瑶，周祖法．大球盖菇与芹菜轮作高效栽培技术［J］．北方园艺，2024(10)：151-155．［23］陈怡彤．秸秆基质类型对大球盖菇农艺性状及营养品质的影响［D］．武汉：华中农业大学，2023．［24］应国华，吴应齐，姚理武，等．油茶幼林下大球盖菇培养料配方和用量研究［J］．中国食用菌，2021，40(4)：47-51，55．［25］王春弘，李九英，魏银初，等．不同接种量对早秋玉米芯发酵料及发酵半熟料栽培平菇的影响［J］．河南农业科学，2013，42(8)：98-101．［26］孔维丽，崔筱，刘芹，等．菌袋、菌种对发酵料栽培平菇的影响［J］．园艺与种苗，2020，40(12)：17-20．［27］张维玲，张硕，汪峰．不同基料配比对双孢蘑菇栽培基质性质和产量的影响［J］．浙江农业科学，2023，64(5)：1215-1219．［28］饶中秀，孙继民，张娜，等．基料添加艾草秸秆对平菇生长及品质的影响［J］．中国农业科技导报，2023，25(6)：208-215．［29］DEDOUSI M，MELANOURI E M，DIAMANTIS I，et al．Biochemical，functional and antioxidant potential of higher fungi cultivated on agro-industrial residues．Part Ⅱ：Cultures on mixtures of spent mushroom substrates and mushroom cropping by-products［J］．Resources Chemicals and Materials，2024，3(3)：175-187．［30］孙颢宸，杨宪忠，蔺毅，等．大球盖菇生物学特性与栽培条件研究综述［J］．寒旱农业科学，2025(3)：220-225．［31］张世敏，和晶亮，邱立友，等．不同碳氮营养源和培养温度对大球盖菇菌丝生长的影响［J］．微生物学杂志，2005，25(6)：32-34．［32］何华奇，曹晖，潘迎捷．温度和pH值对大球盖菇菌丝生长的影响［J］．安徽技术师范学院学报，2004，18(1)：42-45．［33］赵承刚，刘斌，黄福常，等．三种接种材料对草菇生长及产量的影响［J］．黑龙江农业科学，2015(2)：108-110．［34］HAO H，YUE Y，CHEN Q，et al．Effects of an efficient straw decomposition system mediated by Stropharia rugosoannulata on soil properties and microbial communities in forestland［J］．Science of the Total Environment，2024，916：170226．［35］郭海增，鲁欣欣，刘元栋，等.不同麸皮含量对平菇生长和品质质构的影响［J］．北方园艺，2024(2)：109-118．［36］蔡盼盼，张文强，张昊琳，等．双孢蘑菇培养料理化指标及酶活与其产量相关的多重分析［J］．农业工程学报，2019，35(7)：231-237．

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2026-02-03