|Table of Contents|

Analysis of Combining Ability and Heritability of Main Agronomic Traits of Ten Processing Pepper Restorer Line

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年21
Page:
1-7
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Analysis of Combining Ability and Heritability of Main Agronomic Traits of Ten Processing Pepper Restorer Line
Author(s):
CHANG Xiaoke1DONG Xiaoyu1HAN Yanan1CHENG Zhifang1ZHU Weiling2YAO Qiuju1
(1.Horticultural Research Institute,Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Zhengzhou,Henan 450000;2.Henan Dingyan Zetian Agricultural Science and Technology Development Co.Ltd.,Changge,Henan 461500)
Keywords:
processing pepperrestorer lineagronomic traitscombining abilityheritability
PACS:
S 641.3
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20232241
Abstract:
Ten restorer lines and three CMS lines were used to develop 30 hybrid crosses by NCII incomplete diallel cross.Combining ability and heritability of 9 main agronomic traits were used by variance analysis,combining ability and heritability,in order to provide reference for processing pepper breeding.The results showed that there were significant differences among the most restorer lines of 9 traits.General combination ability (GCA) analysis can be obtained PC5-1 and PC008 had the potential to cultivate large fruit species,PC272-35 had the potential to cultivate high-yield varieties.Specific combining ability (SCA) analysis could be obtained PC34193A×PC272-35,PC002A×PC495-10-13,PC002A×PC5-1 had the advantage of high yield,PC34193A×PC5-1 had the advantage of big fruit.The narrow sense heritability of first flower node,fruit transverse diameter,crown diameter,fruit longitudinal diameter was higher.The traits could be selected to be effective in low generations.The narrow sense heritability of fruit weight,fruit number per plant,pulp thick,yield per plant was lower.These traits were influenced by additive effects and environment.

References:

[1]邹学校,马艳青,戴雄泽,等.辣椒在中国的传播与产业发展[J].园艺学报,2020,47(9):1715-1726.[2]张涛,韩娅楠,张强,等.河南省朝天椒产业现状及发展对策[J].中国瓜菜,2020,33(1):65-68.[3]李怡斐,杨小苗,王春萍,等.抗疫病加工型辣椒细胞质雄性不育恢复系的创制[J].西北植物学报,2022,42(10):1637-1643.[4]李锡香,张宝玺,沈镝,等.辣椒种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2006.[5]任福森,焦禹顺,郭志伟,等.10个黄皮辣椒自交系主要性状配合力及杂种优势分析[J].河南农业科学,2018,47(11):90-94.[6]陈彩锦,张尚沛,曾燕霞,等.紫花苜蓿雄性不育系杂交父本材料一般配合力分析及遗传参数估算[J].种子,2022,41(8):80-84,92.[7]赖佳,韦树谷,黄玲,等.不结球白菜主要营养品质性状的配合力分析[J].北方园艺,2021(5):1-7.[8]吴珂,余渝,何良荣,等.陆地棉品质和产量性状配合力及杂种优势分析[J].江苏农业科学,2023,5(6):67-73.[9]王才林,汤玉庚.杂交粳稻主要经济性状的配合力与年份的互作效应[J].江苏农业学报,1989(2):1-6.[10]邹学校,张竹青,陈文超,等.辣椒果实性状的遗传分析[J].西北植物学报,2007(3):497-501.[11]胡全德,张汉卿.青椒几个主要性状的相关和遗传力的研究[J].吉林农业大学学报,1983(3):16-20.[12]WEI N R,LU C P,LI Y H.Analysis of parameter of green pepper fruit characters[J].Acta Agriculturae Boreali Sinica,1990,5(4):67-71.[13]张芮豪,龙洪进,桂敏,等.加工型辣椒自交系主要性状配合力及其相关性分析[J].西南农业学报,2015,28(5):1899-1902.[14]李志华,穆婷婷,刘鑫,等.4个谷子不育系主要农艺性状的配合力分析[J].作物杂志,2018(3):61-67.[15]谢芳腾,刘海平,张红林,等.新质源两系杂交早稻10个性状的配合力及遗传力分析[J].种子,2022,41(2):82-86,92.[16]李婷,陈国菊,曹必好,等.辣椒主要经济性状的配合力及遗传力分析[J].辣椒杂志,2013,11(3):18-22.[17]詹永发,田应书,范高领,等.贵州地方辣椒主要性状的配合力和遗传力分析[J].种子,2019,38(1):68-71.[18]李双,唐显岩,王春雷,等.8个籼型恢复系相关农艺性状的配合力分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2019,20(5):1178-1185.[19]王晓敏,赵宇飞,袁东升,等.三十三个番茄自交系数量性状的配合力和遗传力分析[J].浙江农业学报,2019,31(12):2025-2035.[20]韩娅楠,常晓轲,程志芳,等.辣椒产量相关性状配合力及其遗传效应分析[J].河南农业科学,2021,50(7):136-144.[21]邵登魁.线辣椒主要数量性状遗传参数相关性分析[J].北方园艺,2016(17):26-29.[22]赵宇飞,王晓敏,袁东升,等.18个樱桃番茄自交系数量性状的配合力和遗传力分析[J].西北农业学报,2019,28(12):2011-2018.[23]吴涛,董彦琪,肖艳,等.大白菜主要表型性状的配合力评价及遗传力分析[J].河南农业科学,2018,47(12):102-109.[24]李洋,任孝慈,李晓伟,等.食用向日葵产量与籽粒主要性状配合力及遗传分析[J].作物杂志,2022(2):75-80.[25]肖长春,程祖锌,黄昕颖,等.功能型红米恢复系主要农艺性状的配合力和遗传力分析[J].热带作物学报,2021,42(7):1876-1884.[26]蒋锋,周捷成,董婉雯,等.糯玉米雄穗主要性状的配合力及遗传参数分析[J].分子植物育种,2022,20(20):6838-6843.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-12-04