|Table of Contents|

Comparison of the Effects of Different Insulation Materials on Overwintering of Annual Branch in Top-grafted Grapevines

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年1
Page:
45-53
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparison of the Effects of Different Insulation Materials on Overwintering of Annual Branch in Top-grafted Grapevines
Author(s):
LI DongmeiWU XuanXUE XiaobinHOU ChenyangWANG Zhenping
(College of Enology and Horticulture,Ningxia University,Yinchuan,Ningxia 750021)
Keywords:
grapeinsulation materialsresilience indexmembership function method
PACS:
S 663.1
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20232236
Abstract:
The annual branches from ‘Syrah’ (Vitis vinifera L.) grafted on six-year-old ‘Beihong’ (V.vinifera×V.amurensis) rootstock with high resistance to cold were selected as experimental material.In this experiment,the grapevines were insulated with traditional greenhouse insulation and six different insulation materials,respectively.A comprehensive evaluation of the thermal insulation effect was analyzed by using the membership function method.The percentage of water loss,proline content,soluble protein and soluble sugar content were explored after insulation,the rate of freezing,germination of the annual branch was investigated after overwintering,in order to get insulation materials which could protect the grapevines from winter injury,and provide reference for grape wintering without burying.The results showed that during the overwinter,insulation effect of different insulation materials was ranked as follows T2>T5>T3>T4>T6>T1>CK,and moisturizing effect were ranked as follows T5>T2>T4>T1>T6>T3>CK.The water content of the annual branch showed a downward trend as the temperature decreased,while conductivity,malondialdehyde,soluble proteins,soluble sugars and proline content showed the opposite trend.Cold resistance of various treatments was ordered as follows T2>T5>T3>CK>T4>T6>T1,T2 had the highest budding rate.

References:

[1]张亚红,平吉成,王文举,等.宁夏酿酒葡萄不同埋土方式越冬效果的比较[J].果树学报,2007(4):449-454.[2]郝停停,李妍琪,徐炎,等.23个葡萄砧木的抗寒性比较与评价[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2016(3):13-17.[3]范宗民,孙军利,赵宝龙,等.不同砧木‘赤霞珠’葡萄枝条抗寒性比较[J].果树学报,2020,37(2):215-225.[4]王振平.酿酒葡萄栽培实用技术[M].1版.银川:阳关出版社,2014.[5]高美英,韩瑶,赵伟,等.不同防寒措施对葡萄越冬性的影响[J].北方园艺,2019(7):17-26.[6]陈淑丽,刘俊,张东风,等.覆盖防寒措施对葡萄越冬温度、含水量及萌芽率的影响[J].河北林业科技,2015(4):19-22,34.[7]鲁会玲,覃杨,董畅,等.寒冷地区葡萄树体越冬防寒方法及生产成本分析[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2020(5):25-27.[8]吴亮,梁智,王碧箫,等.玻璃棉保温被在新疆红地球葡萄免埋土越冬防寒中的应用研究[J].河北林业科技,2010(2):8-9.[9]张光弟,俞晓艳,李玉鼎,等.贺兰山东麓酿酒葡萄越冬保护仓温湿度变化规律观察[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2019(2):32-37.[10]邓恩征,张军翔,张光弟,等.不同覆盖方式对“赤霞珠”葡萄越冬的影响[J].北方园艺,2016(16):34-37.[11]李合生.现代植物生理学[M].3版.北京:高等教育出版社,2012.[12]张义贤,张丽萍.重金属对大麦幼苗膜脂过氧化及脯氨酸和可溶性糖含量的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2006(4):857-860.[13]ZHANG T,SHI Z,ZHANG X,et al.Alleviating effects of exogenous melatonin on salt stress in cucumber[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2020,262:109070.[14]赵芳芳,郭学良,刘研,等.冬前喷施EBR对‘美乐’葡萄枝条生理特性及萌芽的影响[J].西北农业学报,2022,31(3):328-334.[15]王海鸥,高展,艾克拜尔·毛拉,等.自然越冬条件下17个葡萄砧木品种几个生理指标变化分析[J].经济林研究,2019,37(4):120-128.[16]李树德,李兆寰.不同防寒措施对葡萄树体生长与结果特性的影响[J].新疆农垦科技,2021,44(1):10-12.[17]CARRERA L,BUYER J,VINYARD B,et al.Effects of cover crops,compost,and manure amendments on soil microbial community structure in tomato production systems[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2007,37(3):247-255.[18]李鹏程,郭绍杰,李铭,等.不同保温材料覆盖对戈壁地葡萄越冬温度的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2014,53(12):2838-2840.[19]张丽.日光温室保温材料热特性的研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2016.[20]赵晓梅,叶凯,岳丽,等.不同保温材料对库尔勒香梨树体保温效果的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2016,44(27):18-21,54.[21]张剑侠,熊燕,王跃进,等.中国野生葡萄抗寒基因的RAPD标记及其序列分析[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(10):30-37.[22]刘荣,刘清国,范建新,等.果树抗寒性生理生化及分子机理研究进展[J].分子植物育种,2017,15(5):2028-2034.[23]陈宁,徐国前,宋瑞,等.基于聚类分析的贺兰山东麓不同酿酒葡萄品种根系抗寒性综合评价[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(4):93-98.[24]施明,谢军,徐美隆,等.贺兰山东麓8个酿酒葡萄品种抗寒性比较[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(5):137-140.[25]陈佰鸿,张彪,毛娟,等.葡萄枝条水分含量变化与抗寒性关系[J].植物生理学报,2014,50(4):535-541.[26]韩瑶.不同防寒措施对早黑宝葡萄越冬性的影响[D].太古:山西农业大学,2018.[27]陈仁伟,张晓煜,杨豫,等.‘赤霞珠’酿酒葡萄根颈和不同根系部位抗寒性比较[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(9):2754-2762.[28]王凯月,李强峰,李玲霞.不同山生柳无性系低温胁迫的生理响应及抗寒性比较[J].青海大学学报,2022,40(1):18-25.[29]吕春晶,孙凌俊,魏潇,等.可溶性糖与葡萄抗寒性的关系研究进展[J].辽宁农业科学,2017(4):50-53.[30]韦霞霞,李玉梅,李彦彪,等.葡萄抗寒性与韧皮部糖分及内源激素积累的相关性[J].西北农业学报,2021,30(3):386-394.[31]刘文瑜.葡萄抗寒砧木的组织培养、试管苗微嫁接及抗寒生理生化特性研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2011.[32]YUSUF M,ALMEHRZI A S S,ALNAJJAR A J N,et al.Glucose modulates copper induced changes in photosynthesis,ion uptake,antioxidants and proline in Cucumis sativus plants[J].Carbohydrate Research,2021,501:108271.[33]BOUBLIN F,CABASSA-HOURTON C,LEYMARIE J,et al.Potential involvement of proline and flavonols in plant responses to ozone[J].Environmental Research,2022,207:112214.[34]王以斌,缪锦来,姜英辉,等.脯氨酸和可溶性糖在南极冰藻低温适应机制中的作用[J].生物技术通报,2016,32(2):198-202.[35]许金亮,谢鹏飞,向世鹏,等.喷施外源EBR和H2O2对低温胁迫烟苗恢复生长期生理特性的影响[J].中国烟草学报,2022,28(3):44-51.[36]董海虎,谭秀兰,党军,等.吐鲁番葡萄免土埋越冬技术试验分析[J].沙漠与绿洲气象,2008,2(5):56-58.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-01-22