|Table of Contents|

Study on the Biological Characteristics of Spur Red Fuji Bud Transformation

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年02
Page:
31-36
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Study on the Biological Characteristics of Spur Red Fuji Bud Transformation
Author(s):
WU Zezhen1LI Wensheng1WANG Anli1HU Zhen1ZHOU Wenjing1ZHANG Zhenjun2
(1.College of Forestry and Horticulture,Xinjiang Agricultural University,Urumqi,Xinjiang 830052;2.Aksu Prefecture Forestry Technology Promotion Center,Aksu,Xinjiang 843000)
Keywords:
short branchRed Fujibud mutationbiological characteristics
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20222213
Abstract:
Taking 3 Red Fuji Bud variations and 2 Red Fuji varieties as test materials,the comparative analysis method was used to observe the biological characteristics such as phenology and fruit setting rate of different short-branched Red Fuji bud variations,and to measure the single fruit weight,soluble sugar and vitamin C content.The biological characteristics and fruit quality similarities and differences of Red Fuji bud change were studied,the comprehensive traits of bud change were evaluated,in order to provide reference for the selection and breeding of good bud changes.The results showed that the phenological periods of the three bud changes were relatively consistent with those of ‘Nagafu No.2’ and ‘Xinhong No.1’ in terms of flowering,branches,leaves and fruit setting.The growth period was 180-190 days,and the vegetative growth period was 210-220 days.The inflorescence and flower fruit setting rates of bud ‘N-1’ were 82.94% and 58.15% respectively,26.76% and 40.90% higher than ‘Nagafu No.2’; the soluble solids,soluble sugar,reducing sugar sugar-acid ratio of ‘N-1’ were significantly higher than ‘Nagafu No.2’,and the vitamin C content of ‘N-1’ was 2.79 mg?(100g)-1,which was higher than ‘Nagafu No.2’,but lower than ‘Xinhong No.1’.In summary,‘N-1’ had the characteristics of high fruit setting rate,high yield and bright fruit color,and was a bud variant with better comprehensive traits.

References:

[1]王中英.果树学概论[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001.[2]宋锋惠,哈地尔?依沙克,何琼,等.杂交榛子果实经济性状分析与评价[J].经济林研究,2009,27(4):36-40.[3]陈学森,韩明玉,苏桂林,等.当今世界苹果产业发展趋势及我国苹果产业优质高效发展意见[J].果树学报,2010,27(4):598-604.[4]侯玉珏,张晓云,赵彩平,等.矮化型、短枝型和柱型苹果苗枝芽特性和叶片特征比较[J].西北农业学报,2012,21(7):134-137.[5]鄢新民,李学营,王献革,等.苹果芽变及芽变选种回顾[J].河北农业科学,2011,15(5):75-77.[6]过国南,阎振立,张顺妮.我国建国以来苹果品种选育研究的回顾及今后育种的发展方向[J].果树学报,2003(2):127-134.[7]邵达元,王清美,李晓萍.红富士苹果优系烟富1~6号的选育[J].河北果树,2001(4):8-9.[8]徐月华,黄永业,季兴禄,等.苹果芽变新品种烟富7号的选育[J].中国果树,2015(3):1-4,86.[9]白教育,李学冲,王惠敏,等.红富士苹果芽变新品种:礼泉短富[J].中国果树,1997(2):10-11.[10]孙俊宝,牛自勉,刘丽,等.晋富3号苹果新品种的选育[J].山西果树,2012(1):5,31.[11]石海强,杜纪壮,秦立者,等.苹果新品种‘石富短枝’[J].园艺学报,2010,37(4):669-670.[12]李文胜,李疆,李玉中,等.苹果短枝型芽变新品种新红1号的选育[J].中国果树,2012(5):5-6,77.[13]何东明.两个梨品种生殖生物学特性研究[D].天津:天津农学院,2010.[14]张琦.果树栽培学实验实习指导书[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1979.[15]罗旭.不同高海拔对金冠苹果光合特性和果实品质的影响[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2013.[16]罗文文.不同生境富士苹果叶片和果实品质差异及其与环境因子关系研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2014.[17]孙文泰,尹晓宁,刘兴禄,等.不同海拔高度对“红富士”苹果果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2013(6):12-15.[18]李野,尹利辉,高尚,等.食品和药品中维生素C含量测定方法的研究进展[J].药物分析杂志,2016,36(5):756-764.[19]邹琦.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:111-112.[20]刘畅,王昆,安萌萌,等.寒地苹果主栽品种果实品质及香气组分[J].新疆农业科学,2019,56(10):1846-1859.[21]王忠友,梁光宏.短枝型苹果应用现状及展望[J].山东农业科学,1996(2):46-48.[22]张秉宇,刘志.不同砧穗组合对“寒富”苹果果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2014(7):30-32.[23]努尔妮萨?托合提如则.光环境对阿克苏红富士苹果外观品质的影响研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2013.[24]贾定贤,米文广,杨儒琳,等.苹果品种果实糖、酸含量的分级标准与风味的关系[J].园艺学报,1991(1):9-14.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-02-10