|Table of Contents|

Fruit Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of 23 Superior Varieties of Walnut in Middle Section of Taihang Mountain

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年22
Page:
24-30
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Fruit Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of 23 Superior Varieties of Walnut in Middle Section of Taihang Mountain
Author(s):
WANG YongLI HongyanCAO YangLIU ZhenghaiWU Yanxia
(Institute of Pomology,Shanxi Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Fruit Germplasm Creation and Utilization in Shanxi Province,Taiyuan,Shanxi 030031)
Keywords:
walnutfruit characterkernel componentcoefficient of variationprincipal component analysis
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20221701
Abstract:
Twenty-three walnut varieties cultivated in Taihang Mountains area were used to study the fruit characters and kernel nutrient components of walnut in different distribution areas of Taihang Mountain area by using coefficient of variation (CV),single trait ordering and principal component analysis,in order to screen out local walnut individual plants with excellent individual and comprehensive characters and provide high-quality germplasm resources for popularizing high-quality walnut variety and standard cultivation in Taihang Mountain area,at the same time,the breeding and genetic improvement resources of superior walnut varieties were enriched.The results showed that the coefficient of variation ranged from 3.07% to 46.65%,and the coefficient of variation of mineral element content and fatty acid content was higher according to different indexes.The No.1,No.53,No.35 and No.29 were all ranked in the top 7 of single fruit traits,and the No.1 and No.33 were the most abundant in protein and the No.64,No.18 and No.29 were the most abundant in fat,the content of linoleic acid and linolenic acid in No.28,No.42 and No.32 were higher than that in others,the 5 principal components extracted could represent 79.96% of the total characters of 23 varieties The key indexes to evaluate the comprehensive quality of walnut were fruit three-diameter,single fruit weight,palmitic acid,linoleic acid,linolenic acid,arachidonic acid,calcium content and protein content,the first five trees were No.1,No.53,No.67,No.32 and No.33 respectively,and the results of principal component analysis ranking and single trait screening ranking showed that the fruit characteristics of No.1,No.53,No.67 and No.32 were excellent.

References:

[1]刘振东,陈翠英.太行山北部山区核桃生产中存在的问题及对策[J].河北林业科技,2016,2(1):91-92.[2]叶方强.浙江省临安山核桃区域品牌评价分析[D].福州:福建农林大学,2015.[3]张金丽,李靖,单显志,等.美国山核桃不同引种品种蛋白质和多糖含量比较分析[J].西部林业科学,2018,47(4):85-88.[4]邓秋菊,王克春,曹凡,等.不同薄壳山核桃单株种子果实品质与发芽特性比较[J].北方园艺,2016(20):14-17.[5]翟大才,吴锦菲,柏晓辉,等.安徽地区华东野核桃果实特征和坚果品质的初步评价[J].林业科学研究2019,32(4):129-136.[6]王庆江,及歆荣,程璇,等.河北南部太行山区核桃需水规律研究[J].北方园艺,2019(24):36-42.[7]国家卫生和计划生育委员会,国家食品药品监督管理总局.GB/T5009.6-2016食品安全国家标准食品中脂肪的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.[8]国家卫生和计划生育委员会,国家食品药品监督管理总局.GB/T5009.5-2016食品安全国家标准食品中蛋白质的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.[9]罗宇年,田英姿,英犁,等.新疆主栽核桃品种的营养品质评价[J].现代食品科技,2014,30(5):258-261,286.[10]薛晓芳,赵爱玲,王永康,等.不同枣品种果实品质分析及综合评价[J].中国果树,2016(3):11-15.[11]罗会婷,贾晓东,翟敏,等.76株薄壳山核桃实生单株的果实品质差异及综合评价[J].植物资源与环境学报,2017,26(1):47-54.[12]李朝峰,杨中宝.SPSS主成分分析中的特征向量计算问题[J].统计教育,2007(3):10-11.[13]梁珊珊,吕芳德,蒋瑶,等.核桃待选优株坚果品质主成分分析及综合评判[J].经济林研究,2015,22(3):7-12,32.[14]左继林,孙颖,吴妹杰,等.美国薄壳山核桃实生种源果实品质主成分分析与综合评价[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(18):235-240.[15]黄晓露,赵志珩,李开祥,等.广西优良核桃单株果实品质差异及综合评价研究[J].西南农业学报,2019,32(3):489-494.[16]翟大才,吴锦菲,柏晓辉.等。安徽地区华东野核桃果实特征和坚果品质的初步评价[J].林业科学研究,2019,32(4):129-136[17]李永荣,李晓储,吴文龙,等.66个薄壳山核桃实生单株果实性状变异选择研究[J].林业科学研究,2013,26(4):438-446.[18]杜天宇,胡去非,王相媛,等.核桃坚果主成分分析及优株筛选研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,39(2):34-45.[19]张亭,杜倩,李勇.核桃的营养成分及其保健功能的研究进展[J].中国食物与营养,2018,24(7):64-69.[20]李俊南,习学良,熊新武,等.核桃的营养保健功能及功能成分研究进展[J].中国食物与营养,2018,24(5):60-64.[21]翟大才,毕淑峰,王娜娜.黄山市屯溪区薄壳山核桃形态指标、营养成分及其相关性研究[J].黄山学院学报,2016,18(5):41-44.[22]刘昊,马庆国,张继勇,等.凉山州核桃坚果表型多样性研究[J].林业科学研究,2017,30(5):771-778.[23]李永荣,李晓储,吴文龙,等.66个薄壳山核桃实生单株果实性状变异选择研究[J].林业科学研究,2013,26(4):438-446.[24]常君,任华东,姚小华,等山核桃不同无性系果实性状及营养成分分析[J].林业科学研究,2017,30(1):166-173.[25]何晓群.现代统计分析方法与应用[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.[26]韩冬梅,吴振先,杨武,等.龙眼果实品质评价理化指标体系的构建[J].植物遗传资源学报,2015,16(3):503-511.[27]董星光,田路明,曹玉芬,等.我国南方砂梨主产区主栽品种果实品质因子分析及综合评价[J].果树学报,2014,31(5):815-822.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-01-17