|Table of Contents|

Research and Evaluation of Texture of 14 Kinds of Lentinula edodes Based on TPA Method

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年20
Page:
109-116
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Research and Evaluation of Texture of 14 Kinds of Lentinula edodes Based on TPA Method
Author(s):
JIN Rongxian1LI Feng1KONG Weili2LU Xinxin1LIU Qin2LIU Yicheng1
(1.Institute of Edible Fungi,Xinxiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Xinxiang,Henan 453000;2.Institute of Plant Nutrition,Agricultural Resources and Environmental Science,Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Zhengzhou,Henan 450002)
Keywords:
Lentinula edodestexture analyzer (TPA)evaluation
PACS:
S 646.1+4
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20221468
Abstract:
Taking 14 types of Lentinula edodes as test materials,the texture characteristics of different types of Lentinula edodes were studied using texture analyzer texture multi-faceted analysis (TPA),and 7 texture indicators were evaluated,in order to provide reference for Lentinula edodes grading research and utilization,and also to provide a foundation for the research and breeding of high-quality Lentinula edodes.The results showed that the 11th species of Lentinula edodes had the greatest hardness,elasticity and chewiness,which was different from other species.Principal component analysis was performed on the 7 indicators,and three principal components were extracted,the cumulative variance contribution rate was 79.75%,of which principal component 1 (PC 1) accounted for 40.92%,principal component 2 (PC 2) accounted for 23.79%,hardness and PC 1 was positively correlated.The index correlation analysis showed that the chewiness and elasticity had the highest positive correlation,and the hardness had the largest correlation,therefore,the hardness index could be used to reflect the texture characteristics of 14 kinds of Lentinula edodes,type 11th Lentinula edodes had the maximum chewiness,hardness 1,hardness 2 and elasticity values at the same time,and are the best edible types.

References:

[1]李玉,康源春.中国食用菌生产[M].1版.郑州:中原农民出版社,2020.[2]连希希,孙佳宁,孙伶俐,等.香菇多糖的研究进展[J].化学与生物工程,2022,39(2):1-5.[3]陈菲,张春慧.香菇酱加工及基于香菇属物种多样性分析及其产品经济效益[J].中国调味品,2021,46(12):111-113,140.[4]胡如响,卢星宇,王鹏,等.香菇不同干燥技术的研究进展[J].食品科技,2021,47(12):63-68.[5]李月梅.香菇的研究现状及发展前景[J].微生物学通报,2005,32(4):149-152.[6]张弘,王琦,姚骏,等.香菇柄营养成分及生物活性的研究[J].食品研究与开发,2019,40(7):203-206.[7]易琳琳,应铁进.食用菌采后品质劣变相关的生理生化变化[J].食品工业科技,2012,33(24):434-436,441.[8]姜松,王海鸥.TPA质构分析及测试条件对苹果TPA质构分析的影响[J].食品科学,2004,25(12):68-71.[9]赵爱玲,薛晓芳,王永康,等.质构仪检测鲜枣果实质地品质的方法研究[J].果树学报,2018,35(5):631-641.[10]王彬彬,李娜,贾漫丽,等.质构仪检测桑葚质地品质的方法研究[J].果树学报,2021,38(11):2014-2020.[11]张红肖,严立斌,孟雅宁,等.TPA试验测定鲜食甜椒果实质地的研究[J].河北农业科学,2021,25(4):39-43.[12]LUCEY J A,JOHNSON M E,HORNE D S.Invitedreview:Perspectives on the basis of the rheology and texture properties of cheese[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2003,86(9):2725-2743.[13]SULLIVAN P,O′FLAHERTY J,BRUNTON N,et al.Fundamentalrheological and textural properties of doughs and breads produced from milled pearled barley flour[J].European Food Research and Technology,2010,231(3):441-453.[14]杨植,王振磊.基于TPA法评价枣果实质地及聚类分析[J].新疆农业科学,2019,56(10):1860-1868.[15]何全光,黄梅华,张娥珍,等.芒果TPA质构测定优化及不同成熟度芒果质构特性分析[J].食品工业科技,2016,37(18):122-126.[16]姜勇,王允虎,薄艳红,等.不同品种无花果TPA质构特性分析[J].山东农业科学,2018,50(10):52-56.[17]韩艳文,李文生,王宝刚,等.葡萄果实质地剖面分析的参数优化[J].北方园艺,2018(19):129-135.[18]陈立夫,裴斐,张里明,等.超声辅助渗透处理对冷冻干燥双孢蘑菇冻干效率和品质的影响[J].食品科学,2017,38(23):8-13.[19]史瑞婕,郭李萌,陈振家,等.热处理对双孢蘑菇质构特性和成分的影响[J].核农学报,2018,32(6):1162-1170.[20]KORTEI N K,ODAMTTEN G T,OBODAI M,et al.Sensory evaluation descriptive textural analysis and consumer acceptance profile of steamed gamma-irradiated Pleurotus ostreatus (ex Fr.) Kummer kept in two different storage packs[J].Scientific African,2020,8(7):e00328.[21]查磊,仝宗军,李正鹏,等.TPA质构分析栽培料水分对草菇子实体采后质地变化的影响[J].中国食用菌,2021,40(4):108-112.[22]沈颖越,宋婷婷,蔡为明,等.基于质构仪质地多面分析法对香菇质地评价[J].菌物学报,2021,40(5):1180-1189.[23]邓敏.市售桃酥产品质构特性主成分分析[J].农产品加工,2020,19(7):50-53.[24]马媛媛,陆玲鸿,古咸彬,等.基于TPA的猕猴桃质地差异分析及贮藏性评价[J].果树学报,2021,38(9):1579-1589.[25]罗斌,赵有斌,尹学清,等.质构仪在果蔬品质评定中应用的研究进展[J].食品研究与开发,2019,40(5):209-213.[25]李兴江,王巧云,李静红,等.黑豆渣粉对饼干品质的影响研究[J].食品工业科技,2017,39(20):152-158.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-12-04