|Table of Contents|

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Mechanized Transplanting Mode of Kale Based on Principal Component Analysis

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年19
Page:
1-7
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comprehensive Evaluation of the Mechanized Transplanting Mode of Kale Based on Principal Component Analysis
Author(s):
ZHANG QiannanWANG KexiongZHANG XiaojuanWU LixiaoCAO ShaonaGUAN Yaobing
(Guyuan Branch,Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry,Guyuan,Ningxia 756000)
Keywords:
kalemechanizationtransplanting operationsagricultural machinery and agricultural art integration
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20220958
Abstract:
Taking kale as test material,principal component analysis was used,the influence of 24 kinds of different transplanting mode on kale yield traits,economic benefits,in order to provide reference for efficient application of kale mechanized transplanting.The results showed that the top three treatments for comprehensive benefits were treated with mechanical transplanting,the best transplanting mode of kale was treatment H9 (transplanting using three-line transplanting,the spacing of plant was 25 cm×30 cm,planting density was 100 050 plants·hm-2),about 33.33 h·hm-2,control manual transplanted savech a time 〖JP2〗cost of about 76.53%,it cost about 29 995.97 RMB·hm-2,the cost saving of control artificial transplanting was about 30.11%,about 123 283.83 kg·hm-2 of production per hectare,control and manual transplanting increased the yield by 19.30%,and the kale under this treatment grew well,leaf balls were neat and uniform,good commercial.

References:

[1]赵晋,黄赟,潘松,等.江西省蔬菜移栽机械化现状与发展分析[J].中国农机化学报,2020,41(10):61-65.[2]张倩男,王克雄,张晓娟,等.甘蓝机械化移栽及配套栽培技术[J].中国瓜菜,2021,34(6):101-103.[3]陈永生,刘先才,韩柏和,等.2020年中国蔬菜生产机械化发展报告[J].中国农机化学报,2021,42(6):1-9,34.[4]徐陶,崔志超,管春松,等.基质块苗移栽机送取苗装置的设计与试验[J].中国农机化学报,2021,42(7):50-55.[5]余建国,张建强,陈军,等.2ZB-2型蔬菜移栽机设计与试验研究[J].农机化研究,2021,43(11):115-119,124.[6]高光明,刘元义,宫玉敏,等.2YG-2型设施蔬菜移栽机自动投苗研究[J].中国农机化学报,2020,41(4):50-56.[7]王克磊,朱隆静,苏世闻,等.不同规格穴盘对番茄幼苗生长及其机械化移栽的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2021,33(5):840-845.[8]刘继展,吴硕.草莓全程生产机械化技术与装备研究进展[J].农业机械学报,2021,52(5):1-16.[9]李洪,王彧超,王瑞军,等.基于主成分分析法的玉米/甘蓝不同套种模式的效益评价[J].农学学报,2020,10(5):21-25.[10]潘越,郭靖,韩政伟,等.不同配方叶面肥处理下苹果光响应模型选择及综合评价[J].西南农业学报,2021,34(4):806-813.[11]唐荣莉,王春萍,王红娟,等.辣椒品种苗期耐低磷评价及低磷适应性类型划分[J].西南农业学报,2020,33(10):2336-2344.[12]陈欢,曹承富,张存岭,等.基于主成分-聚类分析评价长期施肥对砂姜黑土肥力的影响[J].土壤学报,2014,51(3):609-617.[13]芮文婧,王晓敏,张倩男,等.番茄353份种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析[J].园艺学报,2018,45(3):561-570.[14]魏仕伟,杨华,张前荣,等.基于表型性状的叶用莴苣资源多样性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2016,17(5):871-876.[15]彭振,何守朴,孙君灵,等.陆地棉苗期耐盐性的高效鉴定方法[J].作物学报,2014,40(3):476-486.[16]陈新,张宗文,吴斌.裸燕麦萌发期耐盐性综合评价与耐盐种质筛选[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(10):2038-2046.[17]韩瑞宏,卢欣石,高桂娟,等.紫花苜蓿抗旱性主成分及隶属函数分析[J].草地学报,2006,14(2):142-146.[18]黄晓露,赵志珩,李开祥,等.广西优良核桃单株果实品质差异及综合评价研究[J].西南农业学报,2019,32(3):489-494.[19]柳国光.面向效益优化的农机农艺融合方法研究[J].中国农机化学报,2016,37(2):253-257[20]杨文娜,任嘉欣,李忠意,等.主成分分析法和模糊综合评价法判断喀斯特土壤的肥力水平[J].西南农业学报,2019,32(6):1307-1313.[21]黄海涛,胡江,徐冬梅,等.基于主成分分析和模糊评价法的豇豆成株期耐冷性综合评价和鉴定[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(12):2537-2547.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-11-30