|Table of Contents|

Effects of Organic and Inorganic Combined Application on Soil Nutrients,Tomato Yield and Quality

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年06
Page:
89-91
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Organic and Inorganic Combined Application on Soil Nutrients,Tomato Yield and Quality
Author(s):
QIN Chengcheng12WEI Dan12JIN Liang2LI Yan2DING Jianli2HAN Bao3
(1.College of Resources and Environment,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150030;2.Institute of Plant Nutrition,Resources and Environment,Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences,Beijing 100097;3.Planting Technology Extension Station of Fangshan District,Beijing 102400)
Keywords:
tomatoproductionqualitysoil nutrientscombination application of inorganic fertilizer and organic manure
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20213494
Abstract:
Taking tomato variety ‘Pink taro’ as the test material,different fertilization treatments included organic fertilizer (M),chemical fertilizer (NPK),and chemical fertilizer reduced by 50% combined with organic material (1/2NPK+1/2M) were set.The effects of different fertilization treatments on yield,quality and soil nutrients of greenhouse tomato in Beijing Fangshan experiment station,in order to provide reference for scientific high-yield fertilization mode of greenhouse tomato.The results showed that,1) the harvest yield of tomato was the highest under 1/2NPK+1/2M treatment,which increased by 2.80% and 8.59% compared with NPK and M treatment,respectively.2) Compared with NPK treatment,1/2NPK+1/2M treatment improved tomato quality indexes in different degrees.On the one hand,the contents of soluble sugar and vitamin C increased significantly by 41.75% and 61.06%,respectively.On the other hand,the contents of titratable acid and nitrate were significantly reduced by 27.08% and 19.43%,respectively.3) Compared with NPK treatment,physical and chemical properties of topsoil under 1/2NPK+1/2M treatment were improved by way of increasing the contents of soil organic matter,total nitrogen,alkali-hydrolable nitrogen and available potassium by 42.72%,7.87%,26.31% and 10.54%,respectively,under the 50% reduction of chemical fertilizer.4) Correlation analysis showed that significant positive correlations were observed between tomato yield and indexes such as available phosphorus,alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen in topsoil and soluble solid.Tomato yield was marginally correlated with titratable acid.In summary,50% reduction of chemical fertilizer combined with organic manure could significantly improve soil physical and chemical properties,and be a guarantee of tomato yield and quality to a certain extent,which was a recommended fertilization mode for greenhouse tomato application,and was conducive to the realization of high-yield greenhouse soil fertilization and to sustainable development of vegetables industries in Beijing suburbs.

References:

[1]李天来.我国设施蔬菜科技与产业发展现状及趋势[J].中国农村科技,2016(5),75-77.[2]中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴(2020)[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2020.[3]李世楠.我国设施蔬菜产业发展现状与未来发展趋势探讨[J].中国林副特产,2019(1):84-85.[4]郭文龙,党菊香,吕家珑,等.不同年限蔬菜大棚土壤性质演变与施肥问题的研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(1):85-89.[5]周建斌,翟丙年,陈竹君,等.西安市郊区日光温室大棚番茄施肥现状及土壤养分累积特性[J].土壤通报,2006,37(2):287-290.[6]PANGLE R E,SEDER J.Influence of seedling roots,environmental factors and soil characteristics on soil CO2 efflux rates in a 2-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation in the Virginia Piedmont[J].Environmental Pollution,2002,116(3):585-596.[7]闵炬,施卫明,王俊儒.不同施氮水平对大棚蔬菜氮磷钾养分吸收及土壤养分含量的影响[J].土壤,2008,40(26):226-231.[8]陶磊,褚贵新,刘涛,等.有机肥替代部分化肥对长期连作棉田产量、土壤微生物数量及酶活性的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(21):6137-6146.[9]姜蓉,徐智,汤利,等.不同有机无机配施比例对设施菊花土壤养分性状的影响[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学),2016,31(3):504-510.[10]黄绍文,唐继伟,李春花,等.我国蔬菜化肥减施潜力与科学施用对策[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(6):1480-1493.[11]喻景权.“十一五”我国设施蔬菜生产和科技进展及其展望[J].中国蔬菜,2011(2):11-23.[12]HERNANDEZ T,CHOCANO C,MORENO J L,et al.Towards a more sustainable fertilization:Combined use of compost and inorganic fertilization for tomato cultivation[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2014,196:178-184.[13]郝丽娜,吴海华,刘廷,等.有机肥在农业和生态环境中的作用演变[J].农业研究与应用,2017(2):57-60,74.[14]刘羚慧.有机-无机肥料配施对大白菜产量及品质的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2013.[15]王子宁.氨基酸肥料与化肥配施对设施番茄产量与品质及氮素效应的研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2018.[16]刘长旭,张静,张云霞,等.化肥减量条件下配施有机肥对设施番茄产量和品质的影响[J].山东农业科学,2021,53(2):79-82.[17]温延臣,张曰东,袁亮,等.商品有机肥替代化肥对作物产量和土壤肥力的影响[J].中国农业科学,2018,51(11):2136-2142.[18]鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.[19]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001.[20]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.[21]景国安,刘玉群,宋筱英.2,6-二氯酚靛酚测定果蔬还原型抗坏血酸方法的改进[J].食品工业,1991(4):42-43.[22]赵世杰,刘华山,董新纯.植物生理学试验指导[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,1998.[23]罗雪华,蔡秀娟.紫外分光光度法测定蔬菜硝酸盐含量[J].华南热带农业大学学报,2004(1):13-16.[24]姜克伟,须晖,李天来,等.日光温室番茄长季节栽培定植密度和温室部位与产量产值的相关性[J].安徽农业科学,2007(16):4801-4803.[25]宋雅欣,马茂亭,安志装,等.有机无机肥料配施对大棚辣椒与番茄产量及品质的影响[J].华北农学报,2017,32(2):211-216.[26]贺会强,陈凯利,邹志荣,等.不同施肥水平对日光温室番茄产量和品质的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2012,40(7):135-140.[27]梁玉芹,董畔,宋炳彦,等.肥料减施对设施番茄产量和品质的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2017,40(1):21-24,53.[28]何翠,刘晓宇,侯伟娜,等.无机肥配施有机肥对黄淮地区越冬茬番茄产量和品质的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2013,47(6):677-682.[29]唐宇.化肥减施条件下配施生物有机肥对番茄生长及其土壤的影响[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2019.[30]闫佳会,张广楠,杜中平.有机肥替代化肥对土壤养分及甘蓝产量、品质的影响[J].青海大学学报,2021,39(3):55-60.[31]姜玲玲,刘静,赵同科,等.有机无机配施对番茄产量和品质影响的Meta分析[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(4):601-610.[32]孙晓,姜学玲,崔玉明,等.有机肥替代对设施番茄产量、品质与土壤性质的影响[J].中国瓜菜,2021,34(4):46-52.[33]奚雅静,刘东阳,汪俊玉,等.有机肥部分替代化肥对温室番茄土壤N2O排放的影响[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(20):3625-3636.[34]赵长盛,胡承孝,黄魏.华中地区两种典型菜地土壤中氮素的矿化特征研究[J].土壤,2013,45(1):41-45.[35]FENG Y,CHEN R,HU J,et al.Bacillus asahii comes to the fore in organic manure fertilized alkaline soils[J].Soil Biology Biochemistry,2015,81:186-194.[36]解开治,徐培智,张仁陟,等.化肥减量技术的可行性分析[J].广东农业科学,2007(5):55-58.[37]文静,张杰,李家慧.化肥减量生物有机复合肥对莴笋产量和品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2017(4):151-155.[38]杨静,张俊鹏,仝玉琴,等.有机肥与化肥配施对大棚叶菜产量及品质的影响[J].中国瓜菜,2020,33(9):50-53.[39]罗俊,林兆里,李诗燕,等.不同土壤改良措施对机械压实酸化蔗地土壤理化性质及微生物群落结构的影响[J].作物学报,2020,46(4):596-613.[40]刘建霞,马理,李博文,等.不同种植年限黄瓜温室土壤理化性质的变化规律[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(5):164-168.[41]冯海萍,程彦弟.生物有机肥配施化肥对宁南山区露地娃娃菜生长及土壤养分的影响[J].中国瓜菜,2020,33(12):66-70.[42]谭福雷.长期定位施肥对设施番茄土壤理化性质、微生物、产量及品质的影响[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2016.[43]宋春雨,张兴义,刘晓冰,等.土壤有机质对土壤肥力与作物生产力的影响[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2008,24(3):357-362.[44]唐宇,包慧芳,詹发强,等.化肥减施条件下配施生物有机肥对番茄生长及品质的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2019,56(5):841-854.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-05-25