|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Storage Methods on the Quality of Three Varieties of Kiwifruit

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年08
Page:
82-88
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Storage Methods on the Quality of Three Varieties of Kiwifruit
Author(s):
DONG Huafang1CHEN Yang1XU Yanbo2ZHANG Xudong1LIU Yongbi1YANG Jun1
(1.College of Agricultural Sciences,Xichang University,Xichang,Sichuan 615013;2.Xichang Zimei Agricultural Technology Co.Ltd.,Xichang,Sichuan 615000)
Keywords:
kiwifruitstorage methodsquality
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20213424
Abstract:
‘Hongyang’‘Hayward’ and ‘Hort16A’ kiwifruit were used as experimental materials.Normal temperature storage,mix with apples normal temperature storage and 4 ℃ storage three storage methods were set up.The fruit hardness,vitamin C content,soluble solids content,titratable acid content and soluble sugar content of three kiwifruit varieties were determined to study the effects of different storage methods on the quality of kiwifruit,in order to provide reference for the storage,transportation and shelf life control of kiwifruit.The results showed that the quality of kiwifruit was affected by different storage methods.The fruit hardness and titratable acid content of three kiwifruit varieties were decreased under normal temperature storage,mix with apples normal temperature storage and 4 ℃ storage.The soluble solids content and soluble sugar content of the three kiwifruit varieties were increased at first and then decreased at normal temperature and mixed with apples normal temperature storage,but they were increased at 4 ℃ storage.The vitamin C content in ‘Hort16A’ and ‘Hayward’ were decreased under three storage conditions,but the vitamin C content of ‘Hongyang’ was increased first and then decreased.The soluble solids maximum content of the three kiwifruit varieties was ‘Hort16A’>‘Hongyang’>‘Hayward’.The titratable acid content decreasing range of the three kiwifruit varieties was ‘Hayward’>‘Hongyang’>‘Hort16A’.The soluble sugar maximum content of the three kiwifruit varieties was ‘Hongyang’>‘Hort16A’>‘Hayward’.

References:

[1]何靖柳,秦文,刘继,等.猕猴桃鲜果在贮藏期间生理特性变化的研究进展[J].分子植物育种,2017,15(11):4673-4680.[2]赵孟良,李莉.采后环境及处理对猕猴桃贮藏品质研究进展[J].分子植物育种,2018,16(16):5444-5448.[3]赵金梅,高贵田,薛敏等.不同品种猕猴桃果实的品质及抗氧化活性[J].食品科学,2014,35(9):2-5.[4]贺永健,柳春红.我国猕猴桃主栽品种及贮藏保鲜研究进展[J].中国果树,2018,1(18):72-75.[5]何靖柳,刘继,秦文,等.贮藏处理后红阳猕猴桃的品质变化[J].贮运保鲜,2014(8):318-322.[6]西锐,李永武,王俊峰.海沃德猕猴桃生长结果特性及关键栽培技术[J].栽培技术,2013(2):15-16.[7]涂美艳,陈栋,李靖,等.环割对“Hort 16A”猕猴桃枝叶营养和果实品质的影响[J].四川农业大学学报,2020(38):79-86.[8]刘宁侠,段眉会,倪育德,等.黄金果猕猴桃的特性及栽培技术要点[J].山西果树,2012(6):21-22.[9]段永华,李军,李娟,等.不同贮藏方式对红心猕猴桃果实糖度变化的影响[J].农业科技通讯,2017(5):118-119.[10]李玲,刘杨,姚成林,等.红阳猕猴桃冷藏过程中主要品质指标变化研究[J].安徽农学通报,2016,22(23):129.[11]刘晓燕,王瑞,梁虎,等.不同温度贮藏贵长猕猴桃采后生理和品质变化[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(6):264-267.[12]俞静芬,尚海涛,凌建刚,等.不同保鲜剂处理对红阳猕猴桃贮藏品质的影响研究[J].农产品加工,2018(1):1-3.[13]余前媛,刘铭,谌晓芳,等.植物生理学试验教程[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2014.[14]马亚红,蔡锦凡,范小娇,等.猕猴桃储藏过程中品质变化的模拟预测[J].现代食品科技,2019(4):1-7.[15]寇莉苹,刘兴华,李锋元,等.保鲜剂对猕猴桃贮藏效果的影响[J].食品科技,2003(5):92-114.[16]张培书,何伍金,马关雪,等.“红阳”猕猴桃采后存放过程中的品质变化[J].北方园艺,2019(17):108-117.[17]王强,董明,刘延娟,等.不同猕猴桃品种贮藏特性的研究[J].保鲜与加工,2010(2):44-47.[18]王兰菊,杨德兴,邢红花,等.贮藏方式、品种和贮前品质对猕猴桃贮藏效果的影响[J].果树科学,1998(3):239-242.[19]黄文俊,江昌应,陈美艳,等.三个产地猕猴桃品种‘金梅’在低温贮藏及货架期内的采后生理和品质变化[J].植物科学学报,2020,38(5):687-695.[20]廖梓懿,周会玲,姚宗祥,等.动态气调对“翠香”猕猴桃贮藏效果的影响[J].保鲜与加工,2021(5):1-13.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-07-08