|Table of Contents|

Photosynthetic Characteristics of Kiwiberry (Actinidia arguta) in Two Different Habitats

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年01
Page:
24-34
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Photosynthetic Characteristics of Kiwiberry (Actinidia arguta) in Two Different Habitats
Author(s):
LU LiyuanLIU ZhenpanSUN YangSONG JianyuZHANG YueYOU Wenzhong
(Liaoning Economic Forest Research Institute,Dalian,Liaoning 116031)
Keywords:
kiwiberrydifferent habitatsphotosynthetic characteristicscorrelation analysis
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20213117
Abstract:
Three-year-old ‘Longcheng 2’ kiwiberry cultivated under the forest and in the open field were taken as materials,the light response curve of net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and the diurnal variation of Pn were measured by Li-6400 (Licor,Lincoln,USA) portable photosynthetic apparatus.The photosynthetic characteristics and its influencing factors of kiwiberry cultivated in different habitats were analyzed in order to provide a reference for environment condition selection and management in the production and cultivation.The results showed that,1) except for the apparent quantum efficiency (AQY),kiwiberry cultivated in the open field had higher maximum net photosynthetic efficiency (Pnmax),light compensation point (LCP) and light saturation point (LSP) than those cultivated under the forest.2) Pn of kiwiberry cultivated in the open field was higher than that of kiwiberry under the forest at all times of day.The decrease in Pn of kiwiberry cultivated under the forest during midday was resulted from non-stomatal limitation,but stomatal limitation occurred in Pn of kiwiberry cultivated in the open field.3) Pn of kiwiberry cultivated under the forest was significantly positively correlated with photosynthetically active radiation (PAR),stomatal conductance (Gs) and transpiration rate (Tr) (correlation coefficients were 0.713,0.543,0.497),and negatively correlated with intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci) (-0.858).Pn of kiwiberry cultivated in the open field was significantly positively correlated with atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration (Ca),relative humidity (RH) and stomatal conductance (Gs) (0.440,0.405,0.696),and negatively correlated with air temperature (Ta) (-0.459).The kiwiberry cultivated under forest had higher low-light utilization and conversion ability but lower high-light utilization ability than those in open field.During the whole day,the kiwiberry cultivated in open field had stronger photosynthetic capacity.The main problem in under-forest cultivation environment was weak illumination;the problems in open field cultivation environment were strong illumination and high temperature.

References:

[1]张敏,王贺新,娄鑫,等.世界软枣猕猴桃品种资源特点及育种趋势[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(11):3289-3297.[2]黄国辉.软枣猕猴桃产业发展现状与问题[J].北方果树,2020(1):41-43,45.[3]林晓坤,金鑫.野生软枣猕猴桃近自然经营对森林土壤物理性质的影响[J].种子科技,2021,39(2):20-21.[4]赵成日.中韩野生软枣猕猴桃种质资源遗传多样性分析[J].果树学报,2018,35(9):1043-1051.[5]秦红艳,范书田,艾军,等.软枣猕猴桃新品种‘馨绿’[J].园艺学报,2017,44(10):2029-2030.[6]DIANA P,STEFANIA S,STEFANO D,et al.Actinidia arguta Pulp:Phytochemical composition,radical scavenging activity,and in vitro cells effects[J].Chemistry & Biodiversity,2021,18(3):e2000925.[7]冉昪,高萌,屈魏,等.限气包装对‘绿迷一号’软枣猕猴桃采后贮藏特性的影响[J].西北农业学报,2020(12):1-11.[8]李旭,曹万万,姜丹,等.软枣猕猴桃雌雄株光合特性差异研究[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(13):108-112.[9]王振兴,艾军,陈丽,等.软枣猕猴桃光合日变化的研究[J].北方园艺,2010(6):29-31.[10]李红莉,龙作义.不同种源软枣猕猴桃幼苗光合特性的比较及变异分析[J].北方园艺,2017(17):14-20.[11]韩忠明,王云贺,林红梅,等.吉林不同生境防风夏季光合特性[J].生态学报,2014,34(17):4874-4881.[12]李雪娇,李伟,高冠龙.极端干旱区胡杨净光合速率日变化及主要影响因子[J/OL].山西大学学报(自然科学版),https://doi.org/10.13451/j.sxu.ns.2020091.(2020-11-10)[2021-03-02].[13]REDDY A R,CHAITANYA K V,VIVEKANANDAN M.Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants[J].Journal of Plant Physiology,2004,161(11):1189-1202.[14]乐佳兴,田秋玲,吴焦焦,等.无患子幼苗的生长和光合特性对重庆低山丘陵区不同生境的响应[J].北京林业大学学报,2019,41(6):75-85.[15]许大全.回忆光合作用研究五十年[J].植物生理学报,2016,52(11):1593-1608.[16]SALVUCCI M E,PORTIS A R,OGREN W L.Light and CO2 response of Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activation in Arabidopsis leaves[J].Plant Physiology,1986,80(3):655-659.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-04-01