|Table of Contents|

Comparison of Fruit Quality of Excellent Single Plant of Xinjiang Peach

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年20
Page:
27-33
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparison of Fruit Quality of Excellent Single Plant of Xinjiang Peach
Author(s):
HAN Yi12ZHAO Baolong12SUN Junli12ZHAO Shucheng12SU Mingjie1
(1.Xinjiang Production and Construction Crops Key Laboratory of Special Fruits and Vegetables Cultivation Physiology and Germplasm Resources Utilization,Shihezi,Xinjiang 832003;2.The Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecoagriculture,Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps/Agricultural College,Shihezii University,Shihezi,Xinjiang 832003)
Keywords:
Xinjiang peachgermplasm resourcesfruit quality
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20210859
Abstract:
Taking 7 Xinjiang peach germplasm resources as test materials,the fruit quality were compared in this study to clarify fruit quality of individual plant in Xinjiang,in order to provide new germplasm resources for the development of Xinjiang peach industry.The results showed that the single fruit weight of 7 Xinjiang peach germplasm ranged from 125.39 g to 198.89 g,and there were significant differences among germplasm.The single fruit weight of ‘Maotao No.4’,‘Maotao No.1’ and ‘Maotao No.3’ were significantly higher than that of other germplasms.The soluble solids content of 7 Xinjiang peach germplasm ranged from 9.88% to 13.95%.The soluble solids content of all germplasm except ‘Youtao No.2’ exceeded 12%.The soluble sugar content of 7 Xinjiang peach germplasms ranged from 3.05% to 13.91%,and there were significant differences among germplasms.The soluble sugar content of ‘Maotao No.4’ and ‘Maotao No.1’ were significantly higher than that of other germplasms,and the titratable acid content was between 0.57% and 1.74%.There were great differences among germplasms,and the titratable acid contents of ‘Maotao No.5’ and‘Youtao No.1’ were significantly higher than those of other germplasm.7 Xinjiang peach germplasms showed a variety of fruit shape,color and flavor.According to the comprehensive analysis of external quality and internal quality,it was found that the fruit quality of‘Maotao No.4’ was the best,which can be popularized and applied in Xinjiang.

References:

[1]罗桂环.关于桃的栽培起源及其发展[J].农业考古,2001(3):200-203,207.[2]MICHELETTI D,DETTORI M T,MICALI S,et al.Whole-genome analysis of diversity and SNP-Major gene association in peach germplasm[J].PLoS One,2015,10(9):e0136803.[3]俞明亮,王力荣,王志强,等.新中国果树科学研究70年:桃[J].果树学报,2019,36(10):1283-1291.[4]CAO K,LI Y,DENG H C et al.Comparative population genomics identified genomic regions and candidate genes associated with fruit domestication traits in peach[J].Plant Biotechnology Journal,2019,17(10):1954-1970.[5]俞明亮,马瑞娟,沈志军,等.中国桃种质资源研究进展[J].江苏农业学报,2010,26(6):1418-1423.[6]沈志军,马瑞娟,俞明亮,等.国家果树种质南京桃资源圃初级核心种质构建[J].园艺学报,2013,40(1):125-134.[7]徐庆岫.形形色色的新疆桃[J].新疆农业科学,1990(1):35.[8]张钊.新疆桃树种质资源[J].作物品种资源,1990(4):5-6.[9]杨新国,张开春,秦岭,等.桃种质亲缘演化关系的RAPD分析[J].果树学报,2001(5):276-279.[10]程中平,陈志伟,胡春根,等.利用RAPD技术对新疆桃分类地位的探讨[J].园艺学报,2001(3):211-217.[11]姜生秀,兰海燕,廖明康.利用rDNA ITS序列对新疆桃和普通桃亲缘关系的分析[J].新疆大学学报(自然科学版),2013,30(1):95-99.[12]克里木?伊明,韩立群,玛尔哈巴?吾斯曼,等.新疆桃果实性状调查与评价研究[J].新疆农业科学,2017,54(6):1041-1046.[13]王力荣,朱更瑞,方伟超,等.桃种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2005.[14]WERT T W,WILIANSON J G,CHAPARRO J X,et al.The influence of climate on fruit shape of four low-chill peach cultivars[J].HortScience 2007,42:1589-1591.[15]RUBIO A Z,BRECHT J K,OLMSTEAD M A.Nitrogen fertilization rates in a subtropical peach orchard:Effects on tree vigor and fruit quality[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2020,100(2):527-539.[16]谭博,曹晓艳,刘怀锋,等.果园生草对葡萄叶片荧光特性及果实品质的影响[J].石河子大学学报(自然科学版),2011,29(6):683-688.[17]曲艳华,李冬梅,赵丽君,等.新疆桃对4种主要根结线虫的抗性评价[J].中国果树,2014(5):54-56,60.[18]曲艳华,李冬梅,赵丽君,等.野生新疆桃抗酸碱盐性评价[J].中国农业大学学报,2014,19(3):115-120.[19]李冬梅,邵姗姗,宗鹏鹏,等.新疆桃对桃树根癌病的抗性评价[J].中国果树,2012(4):11-13.[20]张翠玲,刘方新,王正欣,等.不同桃树实生砧木嫁接‘霞脆’的研究[J].北方果树,2019(4):9-12.[21]王力荣,束怀瑞,陈学森,等.桃不同果实类型的品质和产量性状的差异研究[J].园艺学报,2008(11):1567-1572.[22]刘子豪,程平.9个品种新疆桃果实品质差异分析[J].现代农业科技,2020(3):215-216,220.[23]RUBIO A Z,BRECHT J K,OLMSTEAD M E,et al.Nitrogen fertilization rates in a subtropical peach orchard:Effects on tree vigor and fruit quality[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2020,100(2):527-539.[24]阿衣古力?阿布均瓦依提,阿迪拉?阿迪力,徐敏,等.六个设施油桃品种果实品质的分析比较[J].北方园艺,2018(8):78-85.[25]王力荣,朱更瑞,方伟超.桃(Prunus persica L.)种质资源果实数量性状评价指标探讨[J].园艺学报,2005,32(1):1-5.[26]林莎莎,张琦,于巨,等.引进桃结果习性与果实品质的比较试验[J].山西果树,2018(3):18-21.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-01-17