|Table of Contents|

Root Exudates of Stipa Community in Desert Steppe Regulate the Structure of Soil Microbial Community

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年22
Page:
104-111
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Root Exudates of Stipa Community in Desert Steppe Regulate the Structure of Soil Microbial Community
Author(s):
ZHANG WenboWANG Yuejun
(Departmennt of Ecology and Resource Engineering,Hetao College,Bayannur,Inner Mongolia 015000)
Keywords:
root exudatessoil nutrientssoil microorganism
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20205520
Abstract:
Taking Stipa breviflora as test material,the root secretion of components was identified,and then plant roots secretion solution was added to the soil,the effects of the different concentrations of exogenous root secretion (C0,C1,C2 and C3) on soil nutrients,enzyme activities and microbial biomass,soil microbial community functional diversity,the microbial metabolism entropy were studied,in order to explore the desert grassland of S.grandis community root secretion regulation mechanism of soil microbial community.The results showed that 21 species of root exudates were found in Stipa stipa,among which the esters were the highest,including 8 kinds of hydrocarbons,10 kinds of esters,2 kinds of phenol and 1 kind of ketone.Forty-fourbenzene alkyl (13.59%),cis-9-octadecenoic acid-methyl ester (16.45%),ethyl-5-octadecane (21.78%),4,6-dimethyldodecane (12.78%),1,2-xylene (10.34%) accounted for 74.94% of the total root exudates,desert grassland was short fancy stitch couchgrass root system secretion of main ingredients.The contents of organic carbon,total nitrogen and total potassium in root exudates with different concentrations were significantly higher than those of CK (P<0.05) which were in turn as follow,C2>C3>C1>CK,C1 and C3 were not significantly different (P>0.05).The activities of sucrase,catalase,urease,microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen content in soil treated with root exudates of different concentrations were significantly higher than those of CK,which were in turn as follows,C2>C3>C1>CK,C1 and C3 showed no significant difference (P>0.05).Soil microbial species richness index,evenness index and carbon source utilization richness index were significantly higher than those of CK under different concentrations of plant root exudates (P<0.05),which were in turn as follows,C2>C3>C1>CK,with no significant difference between C3 and C1 (P>0.05).Redundancy analysis showed that the soil treated with medium concentration root exudates had similar metabolic characteristics to the soil treated with high concentration root exudates,which was significantly different from that treated with high concentration root exudates,indicating that they had different utilization ability of a single carbon source and their community metabolic characteristics were different.In general,the effects of root exudates on soil nutrients,enzyme activity,microbial biomass,functional diversity of soil microbial community,and microbial metabolism entropy showed a concentration effect of low promotion and high inhibition.

References:

[1]尹华军,张子良,刘庆.森林根系分泌物生态学研究:问题与展望[J].植物生态学报,2018,42(11):1055-1070.[2]田晴,高丹美,李慧,等.小麦根系分泌物对西瓜连作土壤真菌群落结构的影响[J].中国农业科学,2020,53(5):167-177.[3]章帆,闫文德,王姣龙,等.2种城市绿化树种根系分泌物对芘胁迫的响应[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2018,38(11):123-130.[4]董丽红,郭庆港,张晓云,等.棉花根系分泌物对枯草芽胞杆菌NCD-2生物膜形成和根际定殖的影响[J].植物病理学报,2015,45(5):541-547.[5]于洪杰,陈少灿,周晓静,等.不同溶剂萃取对分蘖洋葱根系分泌物化感作用的影响[J].北方园艺,2019(1):7-12.[6]赵章平,要凯,康益晨,等.沟垄覆膜栽培对连作马铃薯根系分泌物和土壤养分的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2020,218(2):89-95,103.[7]王小平,肖肖,唐天文,等.连香树人工林根系分泌物输入季节性变化及其驱动的根际微生物特性研究[J].植物研究,2018,38(1):47-55.[8]罗兴,冯海超,夏丽明,等.根际促生解淀粉芽胞杆菌SQR9对香蕉根系分泌物响应的转录组分析[J].南京农业大学学报,2019,42(1):102-110.[9]蒋铮,肖娟,张子良,等.短期夜间增温对亚高山针叶林云杉幼苗根系分泌物速率和化学成分的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(9):3086-3096.[10]王璐,陈明霞,邵云,等.作物根系分泌物对小麦种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].河南农业科学,2019,48(1):66-71.[11]刘成,李彩凤,刘兵,等.3种人参根系分泌物的成分比较及化感效应分析[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(22):191-195.[12]于培鑫.吊兰根系分泌物组成对铅胁迫的响应及其对铅污染土壤修复效果的影响[D].芜湖:安徽师范大学,2019.[13]田晴.小麦伴生及其根系分泌物对西瓜根际微生物的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2019.[14]张允,马绍英,卢旭,等.豌豆根系中分泌物质的分离鉴定及其化感效应的研究[J].植物生理学通讯,2018,3(3):3-9.[15]唐希望,同延安,何鑫.生菜根系分泌物对镉胁迫的响应[J].北方园艺,2018(19):16-22.[16]刘海,韦莉,任永胜,等.柏木根系分泌物对栾树细根形态及N、P含量的影响[J].西北植物学报,2019,39(9):1661-1669.[17]王婷,李永梅,王自林,等.间作对玉米根系分泌物及团聚体稳定性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):185-190.[18]张欣欣,张爱华,雷锋杰,等.人参内生细菌F1对人参根系分泌物的化学趋向性响应[J].中国中药杂志,2019,44(24):5358-5362.[19]马艳华,李雪,曹雅忠,等.华北大黑鳃金龟幼虫对3种寄主植物根系分泌物的趋性反应[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(11):339-347.[20]伍婵翠,刘杰,张学洪.高效液相色谱法测定铬超富集植物李氏禾根系分泌物中的有机酸[J].色谱,2018,36(2):167-172.[21]胡芳雨,孟凡波,张闻,等.黑麦草根系分泌物氨基酸组分对PAHs胁迫的响应[J].农业环境科学学报,2020(9):1937-1945.[22]王璐,陈明霞,邵云,等.作物根系分泌物对小麦种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].河南农业科学,2019,48(1):72-77.[23]刘彤彤,卢巧芳,王男麒,等.根系分泌物抑制连作障碍线虫病的根际调控机制及其应用[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(6):1038-1046.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-02-16