|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Treatment Measures on the Composition and Carbon and Nitrogen of Saline-alkali Soil Aggregates

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年12
Page:
88-93
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Treatment Measures on the Composition and Carbon and Nitrogen of Saline-alkali Soil Aggregates
Author(s):
Monknaren12BAO Xiang12WANG Mingjiu1
(1.College of Grassland,Resources and Environment,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Huhhot,Inner Mongolia 010018;2.Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Soil Quality and Nutrient Resource,Huhhot,Inner Mongolia 010010)
Keywords:
saline-alkali soilaggregateorganic carbontotal nitrogen
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20204484
Abstract:
Saline-alkali soils in the horqin region of Inner Mongolia were used as the research object,and soil samples of saline-alkali soils 0-20,20-30 cm and 30-50 cm under different treatment measures were collected to analyze the changes of their soil aggregate composition and carbon and nitrogen contents.The experimental treatments were divided into two gradients moderate M and severe L,blank treatment (MCK,LCK),fine sand spreading treatment (MS,LS),organic matter treatment (MY,LY),humic acid treatment (MF,LF) and desulfurization gypsum treatment (MT,LT).The effects of anthropogenic treatment measures on saline-alkali soil agglomerate fractions and carbon and nitrogen were studied to reveal the mechanisms of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen sequestration under different treatment measures,in order to provide a reference basis for reasonable treatment measures.The results showed that the mechanical stability of soil aggregates was dominated by <0.25 mm and 0.25-2.00 mm particle size in the moderately saline control and 4 different treatment measures,and >5.00 mm particle size in the heavily saline-alkali;compared with the moderately saline-alkali control,the <0.25 mm particle size in different soil layers increased significantly in the 4 treatment modes;compared with the heavily saline control,the <0.25 mm particle size in the 0-20 cm soil layer increased significantly.Compared with the control,soil organic carbon increased to different degrees under 4 different treatment measures in different gradients (moderate and severe),MF>MY>MS>MT,and decreased with the deepening of the soil layer,with the characteristic of surface rectangle;compared with the control,soil total nitrogen increased to different degrees under 4 different treatment measures in different gradients.Compared with the control,moderate saline-alkali 0-20 cm soil layer MS>MF>MY>MT,other MF>MS>MY>MT,severe saline-alkali 0-20 cm soil layer MF>MS>MY>MT,20-30 cm soil layer MF>MY>MS>MT,30-50 cm soil layer no significant difference MF was lower than other treatments and decreases with the deepening of soil layer.Compared with the control saline-alkali bare ground,different treatment measures can effectively improve the soil aggregate characteristics and optimize the main physicochemical properties of the soil,among which the addition of humic acid is the best treatment measure.

References:

[1]王少昆,赵学勇,左小安,等.科尔沁沙质草甸土壤微生物数量的垂直分布及季节动态[J].干旱区地理,2009,32(4):610-615.[2]张晶,左小安,吕朋,等.科尔沁沙地典型草地植物功能性状及其相互关系[J].干旱区研究,2018,35(1):137-143.[3]魏宇轩,蔡红光,张秀芝,等.不同种类有机肥施用对黑土团聚体有机碳及腐殖质组成的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):258-263.[4]ZUO X A,ZHAO X Y,ZHAO H L,et al.Scale dependent effects of environmental factors on vegetation pattern and composition in Horqin Sandy Land,Northern China[J].Geoderma,2012,173-174:1-9.[5]孙宇婷,周连仁,孟庆峰,等.长期施用有机肥对草甸碱土水稳性团聚体及其碳氮分配的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2014(1):6-10,23.[6]TISDALL J M,OADES J M.Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils[J].Journal of Soil Science,1982,33(2):141-163.[7]江春玉,刘萍,刘明,等.不同肥力红壤水稻土根际团聚体组成和碳氮分布动态[J].土壤学报,2017,54(1):138-149.[8]刘中良,宇万太.土壤团聚体中有机碳研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2011,19(2):447-455.[9]谢钧宇,彭博,王仁杰,等.长期不同施肥对塿土大团聚体中有机碳组分特征的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(7):1073-1083.[10]陈晓东,吴景贵,范围,等.有机物料对原生盐碱土微团聚体特征及稳定性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(2):201-207.[11]王甜,徐姗,赵梦颖,等.内蒙古不同类型草原土壤团聚体含量的分配及其稳定性[J].植物生态学报,2017,41(11):1168-1176.[12]高会议,郭胜利,刘文兆,等.不同施肥处理对黑垆土各粒级团聚体中有机碳含量分布的影响[J].土壤学报,2010,47(5):931-938.[13]何淑勤,郑子成.不同土地利用方式下土壤团聚体的分布及其有机碳含量的变化[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(1):7-10.[14]王清奎,汪思龙.土壤团聚体形成与稳定机制及影响因素[J].土壤通报,2005(3):415-421.[15]罗晓虹,王子芳,陆畅,等.土地利用方式对土壤团聚体稳定性和有机碳含量的影响[J].环境科学,2019,40(8):3816-3824.[16]MALHI S S,ZENTNER R P,HEIER K.Effectiveness of alfalfa in reducing fertilizer N input for optimum forage yield,protein concentration,returns and energy performance of bromegrass-alfalfamixtures[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2002,62(3):219-227.[17]李婕,杨学云,孙本华,等.不同土壤管理措施下塿土团聚体的大小分布及其稳定性[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(2):346-354.[18]王轶浩,耿养会,黄仲华.三峡库区紫色土植被恢复过程的土壤团粒组成及分形特征[J].生态学报,2013,33(18):5493-5499.[19]周瑶.不同恢复措施下宁夏黄土丘陵区典型草原土壤性状及其质量评价[D].银川:宁夏大学,2018.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-09-27