|Table of Contents|

Different Fertilization Methods on Cabbage Planting

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年03
Page:
99-107
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Different Fertilization Methods on Cabbage Planting
Author(s):
HENG Yuanyuan1; XU Rui1; HE Jun1; ZENG Jin1; ZENG Weiqing2; YUE Zhiqiang2
（1.School of Energy and Environmental Sciences,Yunnan Normal University,Kunming,Yunnan 650500；2.Yuxi Agricultural Environmental Protection and Rural Energy Workstation,Yuxi,Yunnan 653100）
Keywords:
fertilization methods; growing situation; erosion of nitrogen and phosphorus; soil structure; heavy metals; comprehensive evaluation
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20194956
Abstract:
Cabbage was used as the test material and the method of field planting test was adopted.The effects of different fertilizers on crop growth,nitrogen and phosphorus loss,soil structure and soil heavy metal content were investigated,and the economic benefits generated by different fertilization methods were calculated.The purpose of this study is to comprehensively evaluate the effects of different treatments on the protection of the watershed environment,the guarantee of crop yield,the reduction of production cost and the increase of household income. The results showed that the yield traits of cabbage at mature stage were as follows,treatment D> treatment E> treatment C> treatment A> treatment B> treatment F.The loss of N and P in treatments E,D,C,B and F was significantly less than that in treatments A.The organic matter in treatment B,C,D,E and F all increased,and the organic matter in treatment E increased by 69.92%,and the organic matter in treatment A decreased by 1.33%.Due to the use of biochar in the treatment of E,the amount of Cr in the soil was reduced.The profit of different treatment after harvest is as follows treatment C> treatment D> treatment E> treatment B> treatment A> treatment F.In conclusion,the highest scores of C treatment were 1.778 points,E treatment 1.522 points,and D treatment 1.462 points.The fertilization methods of ‘marsh fertilizer + biochar’,‘total marsh fertilizer’ and ‘marsh fertilizer + chemical fertilizer’ were more suitable for the ‘three lakes’ basin.

References:

[1]云南省统计局.云南年鉴2019[M]. 云南:中国统计出版社，2019.[2]玉溪市抚仙湖管理局.抚仙湖保护志[M]. 云南:云南人民出版社，2018.[3]杨文明.休耕轮作护碧水[N].人民日报,(2018-7-14)[2019-12-15].[4]李丹，徐明汉.保琉璃万顷之景,护清波荡漾之水[N].玉溪日报,(2019-02-21)[2019-12-15].[5]王立国，成剑波，何腾兵,等.沼肥还田下土壤硝态氮淋溶研究进展[J]. 贵州农业科学，2019，47(3):37-44.[6]杨德玉，张颖，史荣久,等. 硝酸盐抑制油田采出水中硫酸盐还原菌活性研究[J]. 环境科学，2014，35(1):319-326.[7]SMITH R L B,HLKE J K,SONG B K,et al. Role of anaerobic ammonium oxidation (Anammox) in nitrogen removal from a freshwater aquifer.[J]. Environmental science & technology,2015,49(20)：12169-12177. [8]陶虹蓉,李银坤,郭文忠,等.不同灌溉量对砂壤温室黄瓜土壤溶液氮浓度及氮淋洗的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2018(3):175-180.[9]韦高玲,卓慕宁,廖义善,等.不同施肥水平下菜地耕层土壤中氮磷淋溶损失特征[J]. 生态环境学报，2016(6):1023-1031.[10]袁玲,王容萍,黄建国.三峡库区典型农耕地的氮素淋溶与评价[J]. 土壤学报，2010，47(4):674-683.[11]熊又升,陈明亮,喻永熹,等.间歇淋洗干湿交替条件下氮肥的氮行为研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2001(2):153-158.[12]张一楠,黄介生,伍靖伟.香溪河流域非点源污染负荷分析及治理措施探究[J].中国农村水利水电,2017(8):132-135，141.[13]徐志伟,张心昱,于贵瑞,等.中国水体硝酸盐氮氧双稳定同位素溯源研究进展[J].环境科学,2014,35(8):3230-3238.[14]张昌爱,王艳芹,袁长波,等.不同原料沼气池沼渣沼液中养分含量的差异分析[J]. 现代农业科学，2009(1):44-46.[15]程小应.苹果园施用沼肥的对比试验[J].果树实用技术与信息,2019(10):19.[16]王东明.施用沼肥对温室草莓生长发育的影响[J].农业科技与信息,2019(3):22-23,29.[17]吕寅初.施用沼肥对设施茄子产量和品质的影响[J].农民致富之友,2019(3):119.[18]宋丽芬,孙丽英,邵蕾,等.沼肥施用对油菜生长及土壤环境影响研究[J].中国沼气,2017,35(6):83-88.[19]闫兆鹏,孙嘉洵,杨守军,等.沼肥施用对小麦产量及土壤理化性质的影响[J].海峡科技与产业,2019(1):170-172.[20]黄翔,洪娟,陈钢,等.不同沼肥施用量对水稻生长和产量及其重金属含量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2019(4):25-29.[21]杨彩迪,宗玉统,卢升高.不同生物炭对酸性农田土壤性质和作物产量的动态影响[J].环境科学,2020,41(4):1914-1920.[22]张萌,魏全全,肖厚军,等.不同用量专用生物炭基肥对贵州朝天椒提质增效的影响[J].核农学报,2019,33(7):1457-1464.[23]陈静,张建国,赵英,等.秸秆和生物炭添加对关中地区玉米-小麦轮作农田温室气体排放的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(5):170-178.[24]张正艳,胡海军,吴亚男,等.生物炭对马铃薯生长发育和土壤环境影响的研究进展[J].黑龙江农业科学,2017(11):101-104.[25]李洋洋. 生物炭对苹果产量、品质及土壤养分有效性的研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2018.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-06-04