|Table of Contents|

Comparative Analysis of Environmental Performance and Effects of Two Kinds of Plastic Greenhouses

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2020年10
Page:
55-63
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparative Analysis of Environmental Performance and Effects of Two Kinds of Plastic Greenhouses
Author(s):
FU YufangZHANG YahongFENG XueZHANG XiaoliLI PengGUO Songtao
(College of Agriculture,Ningxia University,Yinchuan,Ningxia 750021)
Keywords:
plastic greenhousestemperaturelarge spanrelative humiditylight
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20194331
Abstract:
In view of the low utilization rate of greenhouse land,which was not conducive to mechanized operation,this study proposed a kind of large-span plastic greenhouses with east and west low walls (test greenhouses),which run from north to south and cover the insulation quilt at night.In this experiment,the indoor and outdoor illumination and temperature and humidity of two kinds of greenhouses were analyzed by using the plastic greenhouses with the same span but no east or west wall (control greenhouses) as the control.The results showed that:1)there was no significant difference in light intensity and transmittance between the two greenhouses;2)the temperature in the experimental greenhouse was fast in heating and slow in cooling,and the temperature distribution in the north and south was relatively uniform.The average minimum temperature of the experimental greenhouse was 2.0 ℃,1.6 ℃ higher than the control greenhouse,and the maximum temperature difference with the outside of the greenhouse was 21.3 ℃;3)at night,the relative humidity of the test greenhouses was up to 99%,means high humidity;4)the growth of leafy vegetables in the test greenhouse was better than that in the control greenhouse,but the growth was slow.Therefore,the large-span east-west low wall plastic greenhouse was a kind of large monomer,good thermal insulation performance,stable climate inside the shed,could meet the production of winter leaf vegetables plastic greenhouse,worth popularizing and applying.

References:

[1]中国农业年鉴编辑委员会.中国农业年鉴[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2013.[2]周长吉,刘晨霞.提高日光温室土地利用率的方法评析[J].中国果蔬,2009(5):16-20.[3]王殿友.我国塑料大棚的类型及特点[J].农业科技与装备,2012(8):50-52.[4]周长吉,王应宽.中国现代温室的主要型式及其性能[J].农业工程学报,2001,17(1):16-21.[5]傅莉霞.塑料大棚多层覆盖的应用效果试验[J].浙江农业大学学报,1994(3):313-316.[6]潘强.华北型(双层充气)连栋塑料温室光环境数值模型研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2000.[7]王军,孙兴祥,曹坚,等.大棚多层覆盖小气候效应研究初报[J].江苏农业科学,2002(1):47-48.[8]王吉庆,赵月平,张百良.温室采用多层内覆盖保温节能效果研究[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(8):118-121.[9]李胜利,霍颖君,孙治强.不同层次简易覆盖的巨型塑料大棚温度特征研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2008,42(6):621-624.[10]夏大鸣.单层与双层塑料大棚的性能和栽培效果比较[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2005.[11]杨靖华.苏中地区连栋单、双层大棚小气候及秋延栽培效果比较[D].南京:南京农业大学,2014.[12]鲍恩财.江淮地区双层拱架塑料大棚冬季保温效果及实验研究[D].合肥:安徽农业大学,2015.[13]魏鑫,李建设,高艳明.大跨度双膜双拱塑料大棚夏季降温能力测试研究[J].北方园艺,2016(10):45-51.[14]杨文雄,马承伟.温室跨度对日光温室光照环境的影响模拟研究[J].农机化研究,2015(9):70-72.[15]MOBTAKER H G,AJABSHIRCHI Y,RANJBAR S F,et al.Solar energy conservation in greenhouse:Thermal analysis and experimental validation[J].Renewable Energy,2016,96(1):509-519.[16]崔世茂,陈源闽,霍秀文,等.大棚型日光温室设计及光效应初探[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(S2):214-217.[17]赵瑞,孙吉娜,陈俊琴.辽沈系列不同构型育苗温室环境对秧苗质量影响的比较研究[J].长江蔬菜,2012(6):37-39.[18]韩丽蓉,王宏丽,李凯,等.下沉式大跨度大棚型温室的设计及应用研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2014,19(4):161-165.[19]邹志荣.园艺设施学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2002.[20]宗静,刘宝文.草莓双层高架栽培模式的气象条件分析[J].北方园艺,2015(10):58-61.[21]宋明军,赵鹏,赵树春,等.不同跨度组装式日光温室光热环境性能研究[J].中国农机化学报,2018,39(4):28-33.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-07-25