|Table of Contents|

Effect of Five Different Intercropping Cultivations on Tillage Soil Environment of Cucumber

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2020年02
Page:
87-93
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effect of Five Different Intercropping Cultivations on Tillage Soil Environment of Cucumber
Author(s):
ZHANG Xiaomei1; CHENG Liang2; HAN Yong1; YU Tao1
(1.Xining Research Institute of Vegetable，Xining,Qinghai 810016;2.Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences，Qinghai University，Xining,Qinghai 810016)
Keywords:
intercropping; cucumber; soil nutrients; soil enzyme activity; soil microorganism
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20191991
Abstract:
Using cucumber(‘Jindong 388’)，wheat(‘Qingchun38’)，common vetch (‘Longjian 1’)，celery(‘Changfengsijixiumei’)，garlic(‘Zhangyebaisuan’)，and onion(‘Xiazhouyiben’) as research object，field experiment was conducted to study the effects of five associated cultivation crops on soil environments of cucumber production，which could provide information for alleviating the obstacles of continuous cropping of cucumber.The results showed that five associated crops both decrease soil bulk density，salt content，available potassium content，and number of soil fungi obviously，increase soil porosity，number of actinomycetes and bacillus，the activities of invertase，alkaline phosphatase compared with the monoculture.Associated garlic and onion had better impact of increasing soil bulk density and reducing soil porosity than other associated crops.The impact of improving the content of soil organic matter，available potassium，available phosphorus，alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen of associated common vetch and garlic was better than that of three other associated crops.Associated common vetch reduces soil salt content significantly compared with other associated crops.Associated common vetch had better impact of reducing fungi number and increasing actinomycetes number than other associated crops，not in number of Bacillus and Pseudomonas compared with monoculture.Invertase，urease，and phosphatase activity was significantly increased by the associated common vetch and garlic，respectively.So the associated cultivations could improve soil tillage environment in cucumber and then prevent the occurrence of soil continuous cropping obstacle.

References:

[1]李培颖,刘厚泽,孙蓝笛,等.伴生小麦对黄瓜抗坏血酸-谷胱甘肽循环及产量的影响[J].北方园艺,2019(17):26-32.[2]吕卫光,余廷园,诸海涛,等.黄瓜连作对土壤理化性状及生物活性的影响研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2006,14(2):119-121.[3]段峰,王秀云,高志红.园艺作物连作障碍发生原因及防治措施[J].江西农业学报,2011,23(3):34-39.[4]宫再英,周新刚,潘凯,等.不同比例的玉米、小麦、菊芋秸秆对黄瓜幼苗生长及相关生理指标的影响[J].作物杂志,2015(6):126-131.[5]刘巽浩.中国耕作制度[M].北京:农业出版社,1993.[6]夏秀波,王全华,曹守军,等.大葱伴生栽培对黄瓜根际土壤微生物的影响.[J].长江蔬菜，2012(24):73-75.[7]韩哲.伴生小麦提高黄瓜霜霉病抗性的生理生化机制[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2012.[8]韩哲,刘守伟,吴凤芝,等.不同栽培模式对黄瓜根际土壤酶活性及细菌群落结构的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2012,18(4):922-931.[9]吴瑕,吴凤芝,周新刚.分蘖洋葱伴生对番茄矿质养分吸收及灰霉病发生的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(3):734-742.[10]肖靖秀,周桂夙,汤利,等.小麦/蚕豆间作条件下小麦的氮、钾营养对小麦白粉病的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2006,12(4):517-522.[11]赵晓翠.伴生栽培对黄瓜根区土壤环境的影响[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2016.[12]李隆,李晓林,张福锁,等.小麦大豆间作种小麦对大豆磷吸收的促进作用[J].生态学报,2000,20(7):629-633.[13]ZHOU W J,ZHANGY Z,WANG K R,et al.Plant phosphorus uptake in a soybean-citrus intercropping system in the red soil hilly region of South China[J].Pedosphere,2009,19(2):244-250.[14]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:301-320.[15]关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1987:274-328.[16]赵晓翠.伴生栽培对设施黄瓜根区土壤环境的影响[D].泰安:山东农业大学，2016.[17]谢英荷,洪坚平,卜玉山,等.枣麦间作对土壤肥力的影响[J].山西农业大学学报,2002,22(3):203-205.[18]高丹美.填闲小麦对黄瓜幼苗的化感作用和营养资源利用的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2015.[19]高春琦,吴凤芝.伴生小麦对黄瓜生长及生理指标的影响[J].中国蔬菜,2014,1(10):24-28.[20]赵晓翠,刘文宝,王清华,等.伴生栽培对设施黄瓜根际土壤养分的影响[J].山东农业科学,2016,48(5):75-79.[21]庄岩,吴凤芝,杨阳,等.轮套作对黄瓜微生物多样性及产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(1):204-209.[22]吴凤芝,周新刚.不同作物间作对黄瓜病害及土壤微生物群落多样性的影响[J].土壤学报,2009,46(5):899-906.[23]张晓晓.小麦伴生对西瓜枯.病和根际土壤微生物的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2017.[24]马云华,魏眠,王秀峰,等.日光温室连作黄瓜根区微生物区系及酶活性变化[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(6):1005-1008.[25]BANDICK A K,DICK P P.Field management effects on soil enzyme activities[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1999,31(11):1471-1479.[26]雍太文,杨文钰,向达兵,等.不同种植模式对土壤氮素转化及酶活性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(12):3227-3235.[27]万忠梅,吴景贵.土壤酶活性影响因子研究进展[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(6):87-92.[28]赵庆龙.蒜棉、麦棉套作对棉田土壤微生物及相关酶活性的影响[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2011.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-02-24