|Table of Contents|

Photosynthetic Characteristics of Three Grape Cultivars Grown in Greenhouse(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2017年23
Page:
87-93
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Photosynthetic Characteristics of Three Grape Cultivars Grown in Greenhouse
Author(s):
GUO Kaibin1; 2; 3; WEN Zhuang1; 2; 3; LI Sheng1; 2; 3; QIAO Guang1; 2; 3
1.College of Life Science,Guizhou University,Guiyang,Guizhou 550025；2.Institute of Agro-Bioengineering,Guizhou University,Guiyang,Guizhou 550025；3.Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Germplasm Innovation in Mountainous Region (Ministry of Education),Guizhou University,Guiyang,Guizhou 550025
Keywords:
grape; greenhouse cultivation; photosynthetic characteristics; variety differences
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20171681
Abstract:
Three different grape varieties including ‘Meirenzhi’‘Heisetiancai’ and ‘Wenke’ were used as materials.The diurnal fluctuations of photosynthetic parameters,the response curves of photosynthesis rate to light intensity and CO2 concenrtration were measured using LI-6400 protable photosynthesis system.To provide theoretical guidance for the grape cultivation and introduction by comparatively investigating the photosynthetic capacity of three grape cultivars grown in greenhouse.The results indicated that Pn diurnal variation of three grapes presented a typical ‘bimodal’ curves and the peak appeared at 11:30 and 15:30.Meanwhile,all cultivars showed obvious midday depression of photosynthesis.The net photosynthetic rate of ‘Meirenzhi’ showed the highest with 8.04 CO2 μmol?m-2?s-1,while ‘Wenke’ was the lowest rank behind ‘Heisetiancai’,just only 6.24 CO2 μmol?m-2?s-1 and significantly difference were found among three species.The responsive curves of photosynthesis in mature grape leaves to the changes of photosynthetic active radiation and CO2 concentration could be described with quadratic equations of y= ax2+bx+c.The CCP of ‘Meirenzhi’ was the lowest but CSP,CE and Pm were remarkably higher than others,while ‘Heisetiancai’ showed the highest LSP and possessed a high tolerance to strong light with broader suitable light scope.

References:

[1]穆维松,李程程,高阳，等.我国葡萄生产空间布局特征研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2016,37(2):168-176.

[2]付晓伟,张倩,刘崇怀,等.评价葡萄根系抗寒性指标的确定[J].果树学报,2014,31(1):52-59.
[3]潘学军,李德燕,张文娥,等.贵州葡萄属野生种植物资源调查分析[J].果树学报,2010,27(6):898-901.
[4]杜飞,朱书生,王海宁,等.不同避雨栽培模式对葡萄主要病害的防治效果和植株冠层温湿度的影响[J].云南农业大学学报,2011,26(2):177-184.
[5]王志强,何方,牛良,等.设施栽培油桃光合特性研究[J].园艺学报,2000,27(4):245-250.
[6]李雅善,李华,徐成东,等.不同灌溉条件下葡萄叶片光合特性研究[J].北方园艺,2015(14):1-6.
[7]董华芳,张旭东,刘永碧,等.不同葡萄品种光合特性研究[J].西昌学院学报（自然科学版）,2015,29(1):12-13.
[8]马微,廖康,牛莹莹,等.温室与露地栽培葡萄的光合及荧光参数差异分析[J].新疆农业科学,2016,53(3):393-399.
[9]李瑛,张睿佳,张伟达,等.基于光合特性的设施栽培耐弱光葡萄品种筛选[J].果树学报,2015,32(5):885-893.
[10]郭亮,杨国顺,白描,等.避雨栽培条件下不同葡萄品种光合特性的研究[J].湖南农业科学,2015（2）:10-13.
[11]哈小丽,韩占江,梁继业.不同欧李品种（系）光合与水分利用特性比较[J].北方园艺,2017(2):7-11.
[12]许大全.光合作用气孔限制分析中的一些问题[J].植物生理学通讯,1997,33(4):241-244.
[13]FARQUHAR G D,SHARKEY T D.Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis[J].Annu Rev Plant Physiology,1982,33:317-345.
[14]FARQUHAR G D.Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis[J].Annu Rev Plant Physiology,1989,40:520-523.
[15]杨江山,常永义,种培芳.3个樱桃品种光合特性比较研究[J].园艺学报,2005,32(5):773-777.
[16]张晶楠,张淑燕,孙培琪,等.富士苹果垂柳形树冠光照参数与果实品质的关系[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(4):205-209.
[17]刁凯,李宏,程平,等.不同枣树品种光合特性日变化测定与分析[J].西南农业学报,2016,29(6):1296-1301.
[18]梅闯,罗淑萍,徐敏,等.库尔勒香梨3种树形光合特性的比较[J].新疆农业大学学报,2011,34(2):115-118.
[19]董星光,曹玉芬,田路明,等.中国野生山梨叶片形态及光合特性[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(5):1327-1334.
[20]余阳,刘帅,李春霞,等.LED光质对‘夏黑’葡萄光合特性和生理指标的影响[J].果树学报,2015,32(5):879-884.
[21]刘帅,袁登荣,王志润,等.选择性光技术对‘阳光玫瑰’葡萄光合特性和果实品质的影响[J].果树学报,2016,33(2):187-195.
[22]孟凡超,张佳华,郝翠,等.CO2浓度升高和不同灌溉量对东北玉米光合特性及产量的影响[J].生态学报,2015,35(7):2126-2135.
[23]朱巧玲,冷佳奕,叶庆生.黑毛石斛和长距石斛的光合特性[J].植物学报,2013,48(2):151-159.
[24]李清明,刘彬彬,邹志荣.CO2浓度倍增对干旱胁迫下黄瓜幼苗光合特性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(5):963-971.
[25]李文华,朱清科,赖亚飞,等.陕北柠条的光合特性[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2007,31(2):37-41.
[26]董志新,韩清芳,贾志宽,等.不同苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)品种光合速率对光和CO2浓度的响应特征[J].生态学报,2007,27(6):2272-2278.
[27]李林锋.4种湿地植物光合作用特性的比较研究[J].西北植物学报,2008,28(10):2094-2102.
[28]赵秀梅,王晨冰,李宽莹,等.叶面喷施沼液对温室油桃光合特性的影响[J].果树学报,2011,28(4):680-684.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-12-19