|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Growth and  Protective Enzyme Activity of Glycyrrhiza uralensis(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2017年12
Page:
162-166
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Growth and  Protective Enzyme Activity of Glycyrrhiza uralensis
Author(s):
ZOU YuandongGAO QiongBI HongyanFAN Jihong
(Department of Horticulture,Beijing Vocational College of Agriculture,Beijing 102442)
Keywords:
Glycyrrhiza uralensisarbuscular mycorrhizal fungigrowth indexprotective enzyme
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201712036
Abstract:
Taking seedlings of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch.as experiment materials,the effects of five AM fungi(Acaulospora mellea,Glomus mosseae,Glomus versiforme,Glomus aggregatum,Glomus etunicatum) on the growth and protective enzyme activities were studied.The results indicated that the plant height,basal diameter,main root length,fresh weight of over ground part,fresh weight of underground part,dry weight of over ground part,dry weight of underground part and control (non-inoculated plant) were significantly increased.The growth index of the inoculated plants was significantly higher than that of the control(P<0.05).The activities of superoxide dismutase(SOD) and peroxidase(POD) increased first and then decreased,and the activity of catalase(CAT) showed a rising trend.The effects of different inoculants on plant growth were significantly different.The results showed that Glomus etunicatum,Glomus mosseae,Glomus aggregatum had a significant effect on the growth of G.uralensis,and were superior to other fungi in resisting the adverse environment.

References:

 

[1]王保民,任萌圃.丛枝菌根应用研究进展[J].湖北农业科学,2004(3):56-59.

[2]王如岩,李水强,张金池,.干旱胁迫下接种菌根真菌对滇柏和楸树幼苗根系的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2012,36(6):23-27.

[3]王丽萍,郭光霞,华素兰,.丛枝菌根真菌:植物对石油污染土壤修复实验研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2009,38(1):91-95.

[4]吴建新,王右珊,左强,.接种丛枝菌根真菌对草莓基质育苗生长及果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2011(15):49-50.

[5]中国科学院上海植物生理研究所.现代植物生理学实验指南[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.

[6]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001.

[7]韩冰,徐刚,郭世荣,.丛枝菌根真菌对苗期黄瓜生长及生理特性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2012,28(6):1392-1397.

[8]马放,苏蒙,王立,.丛枝菌根真菌对小麦生长的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(21):6107-6114.

[9]黄万荣,柳振亮,秦岭,.漏斗孢球囊霉(Glomus mosseae)菌根真菌对冷海棠幼苗生长的影响[J].北京农学院学报,1991,6(2):24-30.

[10]林丽,张新成,李杨瑞,.甘蔗器官固氮酶活性及其对接种固氮菌的响应[J].西北植物学报,2008,28(12):2472-2477.

[11]耿春女,李培军,陈素华,.不同丛枝菌根真菌对万寿菊生长及柴油降解率的影响[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(10):1775-1779.

[12]闫妍,孙超,于贤昌,.低温胁迫对接种丛枝菌根真菌番茄幼苗生理特性的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2011,16(6):64-69.

[13]马琼,黄建国,蒋剑波.接种外生菌根真菌对马尾松幼苗生长的影响[J].福建林业科技,2005,32(2):85-88.

[14]任禛,王建武,冯远娇,.丛枝菌根真菌侵染Bt玉米及对其生长的影响[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(6):1163-1168.

[15]徐瑶,樊艳,俞云鹤,.丛枝菌根真菌对盐胁迫下红花幼苗生长及耐盐生理指标的影响[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(12):3395-3402.

[16]吴慧凤,宋希强,杨福孙,.共生真菌对铁皮石斛幼苗生理特性的影响[J].植物科学学报,2011,29(6):738-742.

[17]武美燕,蒿若超,张文英.印度梨形孢真菌对干旱胁迫下紫花苜蓿生长及抗旱性的影响[J].草业学报,2016,25(5):78-86.

[18]刘爱荣,陈双臣,刘燕英,.丛枝菌根真菌对低温下黄瓜幼苗光合生理和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].生态学报,2011,31(12):3497-3503.

[19]田国忠,李怀芳,裘维蕃,.植物过氧化物酶研究进展[J].武汉植物学研究,2011,19(4):332-344.

[20]王晶懋,张楚涵,闫庆伟,.植物抗旱的生理渗透调节及保护酶活性研究进展[J].黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报,2012,25(2):31-33.

[21]南芝润,范月仙.植物过氧化氢酶的研究进展[J].安徽农学通报,2008,14(5):27-29.

[22]姜慧芳,任小平.干旱胁迫对花生叶片SOD活性和蛋白质的影响[J].作物学报,2004,30(2):169-174.

[23]王琰,陈建文,狄晓燕.水分胁迫下不同油松种源SODPODMDA及可溶性蛋白比较研究[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(10):1449-1453.

[24]刘艳,蔡贵芳,陈贵林.干旱胁迫对甘草幼苗活性氧代谢的影响[J].中国草地学报,2011,34(5):93-98.

[25]张希吏,王萍,石磊,.干旱胁迫对沙芥幼苗根系形态及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2016,34(3):160-164.

[26]马德华,孙其信.温度逆境对不同品种黄瓜幼苗膜保护系统的影响[J].西北植物学报,2001,21(4):656-661.

[27]任安芝,刘爽.植物中的超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)对逆境的反应[J].河南科学,1999,17(S1):47.

[28]孔静,裴宗平,杜旼,.水分胁迫下AM真菌对紫花苜蓿生长及抗旱性的影响[J].北方园艺,2014(9):179-182.

[29]胡桂馨,王代军,刘荣堂.干旱胁迫下内生真菌对高羊茅保护酶活性的影响[J].草原与草坪,2001(1):28-31.

[30]梁倩倩,李敏,刘润进,.全球变化下菌根真菌的作用及其作用机制[J].生态学报,2001,34(21):6039-6048.

[31]谢亚军,王兵,梁新华,.干旱胁迫对甘草幼苗活性氧代谢及保护酶活性的影响[J].农业科学研究,2009,29(4):19-22.

[32]刘盛林,贺学礼.水分胁迫下AM真菌对甘草生长的影响[J].核农学报,2009,23(4):692-696.

[33]张中峰,张金池,黄玉清,.接种丛枝菌根真菌对青冈栎幼苗生长和光合作用的影响[J].广西植物,2013,33(3):319-323.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-06-27