|Table of Contents|

Comparison of Drought Resistance of Different Varieties of Hippophae rhamnoides(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2017年07
Page:
27-30
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparison of Drought Resistance of Different Varieties of Hippophae rhamnoides
Author(s):
HU Dujuan1HU Jianzhong2WEI Xuezhi1
(1.College of Life Science,Shanxi Normal University,Linfen,Shanxi 041000;2.Soil and Water Conservation Center the Ministry of Water Resources,Beijing 100038)
Keywords:
Hippophae rhamnoidesdrought resistancecomprehensive evaluation
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201707006
Abstract:
Leaf indexes of 15 Hippophae rhamnoides varieties were analyzed for the purpose of investigating drought resistance,including bound water content,free water content,natural saturation deficit,critical saturation deficit etc.The drought resistance of these varieties was comprehensively evaluated by projection pursuit regression analysis.The order of drought resistance for Hippophae rhamnoides was ‘Taiyang’<‘Fuou’<‘Zayou No.59’<‘Zayou No.12’<‘Zayou No.2’<‘ Zayou No.54’<‘Zhongezayou’<‘Fuza No.1’<‘Zayou No.1’<‘Zayou No.15’<‘Zayou No.10’<‘Zayou No.31’<‘Zayou No.38’<‘Manhanshan’<‘Hongxia’.

References:

 

[1]陈海玲,刘芳,罗红梅,等.乌兰布和沙区不同沙棘品种叶片及果实特性研究[J].林业资源管理,2014(3):122-125.

[2]何彩云,李梦颖,罗红梅,等.不同沙棘品种抗旱性的比较[J].林业科学研究,2015,28(5):634-639.

[3]刘朝霞,余焰文,陈艳秋,.水分胁迫对苗期番茄叶片保护酶活性和植株形态的影响[J].北方园艺,2015(23):1-5.

[4]杨英,占东霞,张国娟.水分亏缺对棉花叶片与非叶绿色器官光合特性及产量的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2015,52(11):1989-1996.

[5]BARRIEU F,CHAUMONT FCHRISPEELS M J.High expression of the tonoplast epidermal and conducting tissues of maize[J].Plant Physiology,1998,117:1153-1163.

[6]YU S W.Plant physiology and molecular biology[M].BeijingScience Press,1992.

[7]王伟.植物对水分亏缺的某些生化反应[J].植物生理学通讯,1998,34(5):388-393.

[8]蔡倩,孙占祥,郑家明,等.水分胁迫对幼龄仁用杏叶片光合特性的影响[J].北方园艺,2016(9):28-32.

[9]赵延霞,骆有庆,宗世祥,.不同沙棘品种雌雄株叶片解剖结构及抗旱性比较[J].北京林业大学学报,2012,34(6):34-41.

[10]YANG GDING G DZHAO T Net al.Study on benefits of soil and water conservation about returning cropland to forest in loess hilly region of north Shaanxi-take Wu qi country in Shanxi province as an example[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,26(2):88-90,99.

[11]XU B C,SHAN L.A comparative study on water use characteristic an deco-adaptability of Hippophae rhamnoides and Caragana korshinskii in semiarid loess hilly-gully region[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2004,15(11):2025-2028.

[12]LU J L,CHEN Y MZHANG Y L,et al.Effect of sea buckthorn growth on soil moisture and soil nutrient in loess hilly region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation2008,15(3):137-140.

[13]刘海涛,贾志清,朱雅娟,.高寒沙地不同林龄乌柳的水分生理特性及叶性状[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(9):2370-2376.

[14]胡亦民,孟建朝.太行山区常见绿化树种叶片水分组成与耐寒性的相关性分析[J].河北农业科学,2011,15(11):35-37,83.

[15]秀敏.荒漠植物蒙古扁桃水分生理特征[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(3):484-489.

[16]杜雪莲,王世杰.容丽.喀斯特石漠化区不同小生境常见灌木种叶片特征[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(12):3094-3100.

[17]李合生.植物生理生化试验原理与技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003:9-16.

[18]洪滔,郭妍,吴承祯,.杉木种源选择的投影寻踪法应用[J].林业科学,2008,44(3):56-61.

[19]黄训兵,吴惠惠,秦兴虎,.基于投影寻踪模型的草原蝗虫栖境评价及风险评估[J].草业学报,2015,24(5):25-33.

[20]徐军,陈海铃,刘芳,等.乌兰布和沙区不同品种沙棘的抗旱性综合评价[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(5):88-94.

[21]高俊凤.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:15-17.

[22]山东农学院,西北农学院.植物生理学实验指导[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,1980:115-120.

[23]田魏龙,将志龙.不同沙棘品种对干旱胁迫生理生化相应[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(5):1215-1220.

[24]李亮,夏新莉,尹伟伦,等.用隶属函数值法对10 个沙棘品种抗旱性的综合评价[J].山东林业科技,20071:59-60.

[25]孙艳茹,石屹,陈国军,.PEG模拟干旱胁迫下8种绿肥作物萌发特性与抗旱性评价[J].草业学报,2015,24(3):89-98.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-04-17