|Table of Contents|

Effect of Drought Stress on Growth and Drought-resistant Physiological Index of North America Syringa vulgaris L.Seedlings(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2016年22
Page:
92-96
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effect of Drought Stress on Growth and Drought-resistant Physiological Index of North America Syringa vulgaris L.Seedlings
Author(s):
FANG Zengyu1; DUAN Yanxin1; ZHAO Qingzhu2; DONG Xiaoying1; LI Peihuan1
(1.College of Horticulture，Qingdao Agricultural University，Qingdao，Shandong 266109;2.Weifang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Weifang,Shandong 261000)
Keywords:
North America Syringa vulgaris L.; soil drought stress; growth; physiological indexes
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201622023
Abstract:
Two-year-old seedlings of North America Syringa vulgaris L.‘James’ were used to study the effects of drought stress on growth and partical drought-resistant physiological and biochemistry indexes，which were controlled by pot plant to simulate soil drought stress.The results indicated that the North America Syringa vulgaris L.‘James’ had the certain potential of resistance to drought tolerance，and osmotic adjustment substance and the antioxidant enzyme activities content increased significantly under drought stress of Syringa vulgaris L.to relieve the damage from the soil drought stress.With the intensity of drought stress increasing，the growth of the Syringa vulgaris L.seedlings height and its stem bottom gradually decreased，and they almost stopped growing under severe drought stress.As drought stress was intensified，leaf chlorophyll and the relative water content gradually decreased.And the leaf electrical conductivity，the MDA and Pro contents increased little by little；while the SOD，CAT and POD activity rised at first and went down latter.The activities of the SOD，CAT and POD reached the maximum on the 40th day and dropped gradually after 50 days of soil drought stress.

References:

 

[1]杨敏生,裴保华.树木抗旱性研究进展[J].河北林果研究,1997(1):87-93.

[2]刘友良.植物水分逆境生理[M].北京:农业出版社,1992.

[3]常英俏,徐文远,穆立蔷,等.干旱胁迫对3种观赏灌木叶片解剖结构的影响及抗旱性分析[J].东北林业大学学报,2012,40(3):36-40.

[4]张以顺,黄霞,陈云凤.植物生理学实验教程(BZ)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2009.

[5]陈建勋.植物生理学实验指导[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,2002.

[6]刘家尧,刘新.植物生理学实验教程[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2010.

[7]郝再彬.植物生理实验技术[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨出版社,2002.

[8]陈少裕.膜脂过氧化与植物逆境胁迫[J].植物学报,1989,6(4):211-217.

[9]杨涓,许兴.盐胁迫下植物有机渗透调节物质积累的研究进展[J].宁夏农学院学报,2003,24(4):86-91.

[10]严美玲,李向东,林英杰,等.苗期干旱胁迫对不同抗旱花生品种生理特性、产量和品质的影响[J].作物学报,2007,33(1):113-119.

[11]贺少轩,梁宗锁,蔚丽珍,等.土壤干旱对2个种源野生酸枣幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2009,29(7):1387-1393.

[12]PIERRET A,DOUSSAN C,CAPOWIEZ Y,et al.Root functional architecture：a framework for modeling the interplay between roots and soil[J].Vadose Zone Journal,2007,6(2):269-281.

[13]MCKAY H M,MASON W L.Physiological indicators of tolerance to cold storage in sitka spruce and douglas-fir seedlings[J].Canadian Journal Forest Research,1991,21(6):890-901.

[14]胡学俭,孙明高,夏阳,等.NaCl胁迫对无花果与海棠膜脂过氧化作用及保护酶活性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(5):937-943.

[15]王启明,徐心诚,马原松,等.干旱胁迫下大豆开花期的生理生化变化与抗旱性的关系[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(4):98-102.

[16]王玉珏,付秋实,郑禾,等.干旱胁迫对黄瓜幼苗生长、光合生理及气孔特征的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2010,15(5):12-18.

[17]梁新华,史大刚.干旱胁迫对光果甘草幼苗根系MDA含量及保护酶POD、CAT活性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2006,24(3):108-110.

[18]王玉魁,阎艳霞,余新晓,等.干旱胁迫下灰白滨藜保护酶活性及抗旱生理特性研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(10):122-126.

[19]邹春静,徐文铎,靳牡丹,等.干旱胁迫对沙地云杉生态型保护酶活性的影响[J].干旱区研究,2007,24(6):810-814.

[20]SERGI M B,LEONOR A.Drought-induced changes in the redox state of alpha-tocopherol，ascorbate，and the diterpene carnosic acid in chloroplasts of Labiatae species differing in carnosic acid contents[J].Plant Physiology,2003,131(4):1816-1825.

[21]陈信玉.植物的自我补偿调节[J].生物学通报,1991(7):17-20.

[22]桑子阳,马履一,陈发菊.干旱胁迫对红花玉兰幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2011,31(1):109-115.

[23]魏传斌,张萍,张凤银,等.龙牙百合在干旱胁迫下的生理变化及耐旱性评价研究[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(4):1814-1816.

[24]陆健.蛋白质纯化技术及应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005.

[25]田丰,张永成,张凤军,等.不同品种马铃薯叶片游离脯氨酸含量、水势与抗旱性的研究[J].作物杂志,2009(2):73-76.

[26]崔豫川,张文辉,王校锋.栓皮栎幼苗对土壤干旱胁迫的生理响应[J].西北植物学报,2013,33(2):364-370.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-01-06