|Table of Contents|

Physiological Response of Different Tomato Varieties to Frankliniella occidentalis Damage(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2016年20
Page:
110-113
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Physiological Response of Different Tomato Varieties to Frankliniella occidentalis Damage
Author(s):
PANG HongcuiLYU MiaomiaoJIA Yanxia
(Agricultural College,Ningxia University,Yinchuan,Ningxia 750021)
Keywords:
tomatoFrankliniella occidentaliswaxtannic acidfree prolinephenols
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201620028
Abstract:
Five different varieties of tomatoes were used as materials,the resistance of tomatoes was determined by measuring synthetic variations of all physiological indexes and the correlation analysis between physiological activity and population dynamics after Frankliniella occidentalis damage.The results showed that waxes content,tannic acid content,free proline content and phenols content changed after tomato leaves damaged,and there were positive correlation among waxes content,tannic acid content,free proline content and the number of thrips,there were negative correlations aomog phenols content and the number of thrips.The tannic acid,free proline and phenols content of resistant variety ‘Ruifen’ changed more fastly than other varieties,the susceptible variety ‘Zhongyan TT’ changed in the opposite,and the others resistant in the middle.Wax content was generally low.

References:

 

[1]MORSE J G,HODDLE M S.Invasion biology of thrips[J].Annual Review of Entomology 200651:67-89.

[2]韩运发.中国经济昆虫志(第五十五册 缨翅目)[M].北京:科学出版社,1997.

[3]郑建武.中国蓟马族的分类研究(缨翅目:蓟马科)[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2010.

[4]GERIN CHANCE TVAN IMPE G.Demographic parameters of Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (ThysanopteraThripidae)[J].Journal of Applied Entomology,1994,118(2):370-377.

[5]吴青君,张友军.徐宝云.等.入侵害虫西花蓟马的生物学、危害及防治技术[J].昆虫知识,2005,42(1)11-14.

[6]RILEY D GPAPPU H RTactics for management of thrips (ThysanopteraThripidae) and tomato spotted wiltvirus in tomato[J].Journal of Economic Entomology,2004,97(5)1648-1658.

[7]JONES D RPlant viruses transmitted by thrips[J]European Journal of Plant Pathology2005,113(2)119-157.

[8]钟锋,吕利华,高燕,.西花蓟马的危害及生物防治研究进展[J].广东农业科学,2009(8)120-123,128.

[9]夏云龙.浅谈模糊数学在昆虫学研究中的应用[J].植物保护,1985(1):19-21.

[10]刘玉良,米福贵,特木尔布和,.苜蓿蓟马抗性与生理活性相关性研究[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(18):8569-8571,8613.

[11]倪郁,宋超,王小清.低温胁迫下拟南芥表皮蜡质的响应机制[J].中国农业科学,2014(2):252-261.

[12]杨世勇,王蒙蒙,谢建春.茉莉酸对棉花单宁含量和抗虫相关酶活性的诱导效应[J].生态学报,2013(5):1615-1625.

[13]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000:201-202.

[14]韩富根,刘学芝,焦桂珍.用福林法测定烟叶中总酚含量的探讨[J].河南农业大学学报,1993(1):95-98.

[15]蒋兴川,张勇,桂富荣,.辣椒植株上西花蓟马的种群动态和空间分布[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2011(4):465-471.

[16]钦俊德.昆虫与植物的关系[M].北京:科学出版社,19874-88.

[17]戈峰.害虫对植物的胁迫作用[M]//万方浩.昆虫生态学研究.北京:中国科学技术出版社,199287-91.

[18]梁迎暖,郭巧生,张重义,.怀菊花期次生代谢物含量及同功酶活性动态变化研究[J].中国中药杂志,2007,2(3):199-202.

[19]袁庆华,桂枝,张文淑.苜蓿抗感褐斑病品种内超氧化物歧化酶、过氧化物酶和多酚氧化酶活性的比较[J].草业学报,2002,11(2):100-104.

[20]王美芳,陈巨莲,原国辉,.植物表面蜡质对植食性昆虫的影响研究进展[J].生态环境学报,2009(3):1155-1160.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-11-22