|Table of Contents|

Fungal Diversity of Saline Alkali Soil in Yellow River Delta(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2016年18
Page:
185-189
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Fungal Diversity of Saline Alkali Soil in Yellow River Delta
Author(s):
WANG Yanyun; GUO Dufa
(College of Geography and Environment，Shandong Normal University，Jinan，Shandong 250014)
Keywords:
Yellow River Delta; saline alkali land; 454 high throughput sequencing technology; fungal diversity
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201618046
Abstract:
Saline alkali land soils，including Bare land，Aeluropus littoralis var.sinensis，Suaeda glauca，Tamarix chinensis，were researched by 454 high-throughput sequencing technologies to study soil fungal community and diversity.The results showed that,5 phyla，22 classes，59 orders，87 families，and 157 genus were obtained.Ascomycota was the most predominant phylum in all plots，Basidiomycetes was the second predominant phylum.Soil fungal diversity existed certain difference in different samples，and the diversity index in bare land was the highest (2 070) and in Aeluropus littoralis var.sinensis was the lowest (1 490).The relevance between Ascomycota with soil available nitrogen and Glomeromycota with soil available nitrogen were maximum.The relevance between Basidiomycota with soil available nitrogen，with conductivity，and Chytridiomycota with soil available nitrogen，with conductivity were more higher.Available phosphorus was the maximum factor to Mucoromycotina.The effect of soil available phosphorus on the fungi was the largest in the five environmental variables.

References:

 

[1]张建锋,宋玉民,邢尚军,等.盐碱地改良利用与造林技术[J].东北林业大学学报,2002,30(6):124-129.

[2]高文星,张莉丽,任伟,等.河西走廊盐渍土不同种植年限苜蓿根际磷含量变异特征[J].草业科学,2008,25(7):54-58.

[3]王斌,马兴旺,单娜娜,等.新疆盐碱地土壤改良剂的选择与应用[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(7):111-115.

[4]毕玉波,刘守军.黄河三角洲滨海盐渍土改良措施[J].农业开发与装备,2014(9):48-48.

[5]王伟,解建仓,黄俊铭,等.盐碱地治理新模式研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2009,20(5):117-119.

[6]BOON N,TOP E M,VERSTRAETE W,et al.Bioaugmentation as a tool to protect the structure and function of anactivated-sludge microbial community against a 3-chloroaniline shockload[J].Appliedand Environmental Microbiology,2003,69(3):1511-520.

[7]RAINA V,SUAR M,SINGH A,et a1.Enhanced biodegradation of hexachlorocyclohexane(HCH)in contaminated soils via inoculation with Sphingobium indicum B90A[J].Biodegradation,2008,19(1)：27-40.

[8]赵爱花,杜晓军,臧婧,等.宝天曼落叶阔叶林土壤细菌多样性[J].生物多样性，2015，23(5):649-657.

[9]TIEDJE J M,ASUMING-BREMPONG S,NSSLEIN K,et al.Opening the black box of soil microbial diversity[J].Applied Soil Ecology，1999,13(2):109-122.

[10]MACAE A.The use of 16S rDNA methods in soil microbial ecology[J].Brazilian Journal of Microbiology，2000,31(2):77-82.

[11]FERNANDO WJD,Li R.Opening the black box:under-standing the influence of cropping systems and plant com-munities on bacterial and fungal population dynamics[J].Ceylon Journal of Science(Biology Science),2012,41:89-110.

[12]张文力.高通量测序数据分析现状与挑战[J].集成技术,2012,1(3):20-24.

[13]贺纪正,袁超磊,沈菊培,等.土壤宏基因组学研究方法与进展[J].土壤学报,2012,49(1):155-164.

[14]刘银银,孙庆业,李峰,等.洞庭湖典型湿地植被群落土壤微生物特征[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(5):1233-1237.

[15]TER BRAAK C J F,SMILAUER P.CANOCO Reference manual and user,s guide to canoco for Windows (version45)[M].New York：Centre for Biometry Wageningen,2002.

[16]BORCARD D,DRAPEAU P.Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation[J].Ecology,1992，73(3):1045-1055.

[17]何苑皞,周国英,王圣洁,等.杉木人工林土壤真菌遗传多样性[J].生态学报,2014,34(10):2725-2736.

[18]韩世忠,高人,马红亮,等.中亚热带森林土壤真菌多样性的案例研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2015(3):343-352.

[19]韩世忠,高人,马红亮,等.建瓯万木林自然保护区两种森林类型土壤真菌多样性[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(9):2613-2620.

[20]曹迪.黄河三角洲典型植物群落土壤微生物特征的研究[D].天津:南开大学,2011.

[21]王笛,马风云,姚秀粉,等.黄河三角洲退化湿地土壤养分、微生物与土壤酶特性及其关系分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(5):94-98.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-11-01