|Table of Contents|

Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Grape Rootstocks(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2016年17
Page:
17-21
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Grape Rootstocks
Author(s):
HAO TingtingZHANG BoZHANG Jianxia
(College of Horticulture,Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University/State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology in Arid Areas (Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University)/Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology and Germplasm Innovation in Northwest China,Ministry of Agriculture,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100)
Keywords:
graperootstockhybriddrought resistancecomprehensive evaluation
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201617004
Abstract:
Taking 22 grape rootstock varieties or hybrids as materials,the relative water content(RWC),relative conductivity,chlorophyll content,proline(Pro) and MDA of one-year-old potted plant were determined in different drought stress time (0,6,12,18 days).The drought-resistance level with subordinate function was evaluated.The results showed that the drought-resistance level of tested materials could be divided into three types according to the results of five 〖JP4〗indicators on 18th day.The control ‘Yanshan-1’ and variety ‘Kangzhen 3’ belonged to high resistance;‘225Ru’‘110R’‘101-14’‘5C’,V.riparia Mcadams,‘6-12-1’‘6-12-4’ belonged to middle resistance;‘1103P’‘188-08’‘00-1-5’‘00-1-10’‘Beta’‘Dogridge’‘3309’‘5BB’‘1-1-6’‘6-12-6’‘SO4’‘Beichun’ and control V.Riparia(♀) belonged to low resistance.Variety of high resistance ‘Kangzhen 3’ and middle resistance ‘225Ru’‘110R’‘101-14’‘5C’ could be used in grape production of arid and semi-arid areas,hybrid of middle resistance as ‘6-12-1’‘6-12-4’ could be used for further screening of adversity resistance(such as cold hardiness,salt tolerance,etc.) and laid the foundation of new variety breeding.

References:

 

[1]綦伟,李瑞臣,徐月华,等.葡萄抗旱性研究进展[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,20053):33-36.

[2]王跃进,杨亚州,张剑侠,等.中国葡萄属野生种及其种间 F1代抗旱性鉴定初探[J].园艺学报,2004316):711-714.

[3]刘三军,张秋叶,王红磊.葡萄品种的抗旱性抗盐性及抗涝性的鉴定评价研究[J].宁夏科技,20021):33-34.

[4]惠竹梅,孙万金,张振文.外源Ca2+对水分胁迫下酿酒葡萄黑比诺主要抗旱生理指标的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2007359):137-140.

[5]王恒振,史红梅,王媛媛,等.干旱胁迫对葡萄生理生化影响的研究进展[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2011(3)71-75.

[6]冀鹏飞,薛斌,刘志华,等.干旱胁迫下葡萄根系的生理生化变化与抗旱性的关系[J].北方园艺,20124):17-20.

[7]陈绍莉,郭修武.葡萄砧木抗旱性鉴定与研究[J].中国果树,20091):38-42.

[8]孙茜,任磊,马文婷,等.四种葡萄砧木抗旱性的鉴定[J].湖北农业科学,2015543):624-626.

[9]杨静慧,杨恩琴,杨焕婷.苹果砧木资源抗旱性研究[J].华北农学报,1996112):81-86.

[10]郝再彬,苍晶,徐仲.植物生理实验[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社,2004.

[11]侯福林.植物生理学实验教程[M].北京:科学出版社,2015.

[12]薛香,吴玉娥.小麦叶片叶绿素含量测定及其与SPAD值的关系[J].湖北农业科学,20104911):2702-2703.

[13]李志丹,韩瑞宏,廖桂兰,等.植物叶片中叶绿素提取方法的比较研究[J].广东第二师范学院学报,2011313):80-83.

[14]杨素苗,杜纪壮,李保国,等.土壤水分胁迫对红富士苹果叶片渗透调节特性的影响[J].河北农业科学,20152):25-28.

[15]吴林,李亚东,刘洪,等.果树水分胁迫研究进展[J].吉林农业大学学报,1996182):91-97.

[16]常永义,吴红,牛军强.干旱胁迫对葡萄叶片生理指标的影响[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2005(2)11-14.

[17]杨亚州.中国葡萄属野生种抗旱性鉴定与抗旱基因的RAPD标记[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2003.

[18]陈珂,蒋祺,类延宝,等.植物对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J].安徽农业科学,2009375):1907-1908.

[19]陈继峰.葡萄抗逆性砧木品种与利用[J].山西果树,20021):33.

[20]潘学军,张文娥,杨秀永,等.贵州喀斯特山区野生葡萄实生苗抗旱机理研究[J].西北植物学报,2010305):955-961.

[21]杨亚州,王跃进,张剑侠,等.中国葡萄属野生种抗旱基因的分子标记及遗传分析[J].园艺学报,2007345):1087-1092.

[22]王勇,李玉玲,骆强伟,等.6个葡萄品种(系)抗旱性比较研究[J].中国农学通报,20143019):219-222.

[23]陈继峰,刘三军,孔庆山,等.葡萄砧木的抗逆性试验[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,20002):16-17.

[24]KOUNDOURAS STSIALTAS I TZIOZIOU Eet al.Rootstock effects on the adaptive strategies of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.cv.Cabernet Sauvignon) under contrasting water statusLeaf physiological and structural responses[J]AgricultureEcosystems and Environment2008,12886-96.

[25]OZDEN MVARDIN HSIMSEK Met alEffects of rootstocks and irrigation levels on grape quality of Vitis vinifera L.cv.Shiraz[J]African Journal of Biotechnology201025):3801-3807.

[26]陈绍莉,刘金昌.葡萄砧木抗旱性初步鉴定[J].河北果树,20083):9-11.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-10-11