|Table of Contents|

Application of Hierarchy-relation Analysis in Comprehensive Evaluation for the Quality of Introduction Table Grapes(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2016年16
Page:
1-8
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Application of Hierarchy-relation Analysis in Comprehensive Evaluation for the Quality of Introduction Table Grapes
Author(s):
BAI Shijian; LI Chao; HU Jinge; CAI Junshe; ZHAO Ronghua; CHEN Guang
（Research Institute of Grape and Melon of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region，Shanshan，Xinjiang 838200)
Keywords:
Turpan region; introduction table grapes; AHP method; grey correlation analysis; quality evaluation
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201616001
Abstract:
By comparing the 17 quality related indicators of 18 kinds of grapes in Turpan area in recent years，comprehensive evaluation was established by AHP method and grey correlation analysis.APH method was used to determine the weight value of various characters.The present study was to evaluate the quality of introduced table grapes in Turpan 〖JP4〗area，and to provide the basis for screening suitable varieties cultivated in the region.The results showed that flavor，solid-acid ratio，sugar-acid ratio and grain weight represented a significant share.The weight of each affecting factor was 0.119，0.115，0.115 and 0.096.Grape was sorted and classified according to the grey correlation degree of 18 varieties，correlation weighted sort was consistent with experts evaluate，rank correlation coefficient was 0.899.And eventually 4 varieties with good flavor，moderate solid-acid ratio and sugar-acid ratio，big berry，excellent appearance and internal quality were picked out.5 varieties with excellent internal and part appearance quality were also picked out simultaneously.The results indicated that the combination of the grey correlation analysis and AHP method could be used to evaluate quality of grape.

References:

 

[1]陶然,王晨,房经贵,等.我国葡萄育种研究概况[J].江西农业学报,2012,24(6):24-30.

[2]耿新丽,程卫国,骆强伟.吐鲁番葡萄产业发展的现状及对策[J].新疆农业科学,2008,45(S1):145-147.

[3]王发明.我国鲜食葡萄生产现状与发展趋势[J].西北园艺,2003(8):7-8.

[4]毛亮,王婷,董胜利,等.新疆吐鲁番葡萄产业可持续发展研究初探[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2013(1):61-64.

[5]陈玲,韩琛,肖丽,等.吐鲁番无核白葡萄产业现状与研究趋势[J].农产品加工,2012(3):99-110.

[6]方明智.吐鲁番无核白葡萄如何实现制干向鲜食的转变[J].新疆农业科学,2006,43(S1):164-166.

[7]刘龙昌,尚富德,向其柏.植物品种综合评价方法-以桂花为例[J].河南大学学报(自然科学版),2003,33(1):14-17.

[8]陈和明,江南,朱根发,等.层次分析法在大花蕙兰品种选择上的应用[J].亚热带植物科学，2009,38(2):30-32.

[9]曾宪文,彭重华,梁智娇.模糊数学法在竹子观赏性评价中的应用[J].竹子研究汇刊,2009，28(3):29-33.

[10]雷中华,王琴,石必显，等.应用灰色系统理论对向日葵品种进行综合评价[J].新疆农业科学,2010,47(9):1770-1774.

[11]LIU X Q，WANG J，ZHANG D，et al.Grey relational analysis on the relation between marine environmental factors and oxidationreduction potential[J].Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology,2009,27(3):583-586.

[12]VCLAV S，MIROSLAV K，MARTIN S，et al.Smoothness prior information in principal component analysis of dynamic image data[J].Information Processing in Medical Imaging,2001,2082:225-231.

[13]弓成林,郭爱民,汪小伟,等.灰色关联度和层次分析法在葡萄品种评价上的应用[J].西南农业学报,2002,15(1):79-82.

[14]陈贤,杨荣萍,杨德,等.AHP法和灰色关联法在小果型番茄果实商品性状评价上的应用[J].河南农业科学,2008(11):107-110.

[15]罗英,乔锋,吴立东,等.基于AHP 法和灰色关联法的辣椒果实外观品质评价[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(2):157-161.

[16]王青,戴思兰,何晶,等.灰色关联法和层次分析法在盆栽多头小菊株系选择中的应用[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(17):3653-3660.

[17]刘崇怀,沈育杰,陈俊.葡萄种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2006.

[18]白保璋.植物生理生化[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003.

[19]高俊凤.植物生理学指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社，2006.

[20]欧阳寿如.葡萄的品种及其研究[M].太原:山西人民出版社,1986:25-62.

[21]SAATY T L.How to make a decision:The analytic hierarchy process[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1990,48:9-26.

[22]刘录祥.灰色系统理论应用于作物新品种综合评估初探[J].中国农业科学，1989,22(3):22-24.

[23]中华全国供销合作总社.鲜葡萄：GH/T 1022-2000[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2000.

[24]深圳市质量技术监督局.预包装鲜食葡萄购销要求：DB440300T 25.4-2004[S].北京:中国标准出版社，2000.

[25]新疆维吾尔自治区质量技术监督局.红地球质量分级标准:DB65/T2832-2007[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.

[26]中华人民共和国农业部.鲜食葡萄:NY/T 470-2001[S].北京：中国标准出版社,2004.

[27]范士杰.试用灰色关联度分析评价油菜区试品种[J].种子,1997(3):53-56.

[28]李橙,杨志新,刘树庆,等.河北省主产区葡萄品质综合评价方法的比较分析[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(17):10229-10234.

[29]罗国光.鲜食葡萄的品质要求和品味评分标准[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,1986(3):4-6.

[30]中华人民共和国农业部.无核白葡萄:NY/T 704-2003[S].北京：中国标准出版社,2004.

[31]虞晓芬,傅玳.多指标综合评价方法综述[J].统计与决策,2004(11):119-121.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-09-01