|Table of Contents|

Study on the Effect of Microbial Agents on Growth and Yield of Tomato(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2016年07
Page:
27-30
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Study on the Effect of Microbial Agents on Growth and Yield of Tomato
Author(s):
FANG Xuedan1; 2; GENG Liping1; 2; LIU Wenju1; 2 ; LI Bowen1; 2
（1.College of Resources and Environmental Sciences，Agricultural University of Hebei，Baoding,Hebei 071001；2.Key Laboratory for Farmland Eco-Environment，Baoding,Hebei 071001）
Keywords:
tomato; microbial inoculants; commodity rate; yield
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201607007
Abstract:
Taking the tomato ‘Xiuyu’ as experimental material,the tomato plant height，single fruit weight，fruit number per plant，commodity rate and the yield of the tomato of microbial inoculants on greenhouse were studied.The results showed that adding microbial inoculants could promote tomato growth，increase tomato commodity rate，fruit number per plant and the single fruit weight，raise commodity rate and output of tomato，in the greenhouse those were more higher than conventional fertilization and added the same amount of matrix.The tomato commodity rate of A1(conventional fertilization)，A2 (conventional fertilization plus liquid microbial agents) and A3 (conventional fertilization plus equal amount matrix) compared with CK(no fertilizer control) were increased by 0.44%，1.67% and 0.87%,the treatment of A2 and CK compared with significant difference (P<0.05).The commodity rate of A2 was the most prominent，the average commodity rate reached 94.25%，increased by 1.22% and 0.79% (P<0.05)，compared with A1 and A3 the difference was significant (P<0.05).Compared to CK，the yield of A1,A2 and A3 increased 1 170.70 kg/667m2，1 453.45 kg/667m2 and 1 193.26 kg/667m2,which increased by 28.40%,35.26% and 28.95%,respectively.The yield of A2 was the most prominent，the average yield reached 5 575.68 kg/667m2,for A1 and A3 increased by 5.35% and 4.91%,compared with A1 and A3 the difference were significant(P<0.05).

References:

 

[1]赵雯,李金叶.中国番茄国际竞争力分析[J].新疆社会科学,2008,(12):19-21.

[2]王艳群，彭正萍，薛世川.过量施肥对设施农田土壤生态环境的影响[J].农业科学学报，2005（24）:81-84.

[3]李博文.蔬菜安全高效施肥[M].北京：中国农业出版社，2014：47-50.

[4]孟瑶,徐凤花,孟庆有，等.中国微生物肥料研究及应用进展[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(6):276-283.

[5]王朋,刘丹.微生物肥料对绿色食品蔬菜品质的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2002（21）:562-563.

[6]LI J，ZHAO B，LI X，et al.Effects of long-term combined application of organic and mineral fertilizers on microbial biomass，soil enzyme activities and soil fertility[J].Agricultural Sciences in China，2008，7(3):336-343.

[7]罗玉兰，田龚，张冬梅,等.微生物菌剂对连栋大棚土壤养分及硝态氮累积的影响[J].中国农学通报，2015,31(13)：224-228.

[8]刘晚苟,陈月女,张燕群,等.微生物菌肥及施肥方式对辣椒品质的影响[J].热带农业科学,2014,34(12):58.

[9]耿建梅,丁淑英.降低蔬菜中硝酸盐含量的途径及其机制[J].四川环境,2001,20(2):27-29.

[10]龙明华,于文进,唐小付，等.复合微生物肥料在无公害蔬菜栽培上的效应初报[J].中国蔬菜,2002(5):4-6.

[11]孙淑荣.绿色食品与微生物肥料[C].吉林省绿色食品开发学术研讨会，2004.

[12]张雪峰,胡滨.微生物肥料对土壤生态环境修复效应的影响[J].绿色科技,2011(2):98-100.

[13]于振良,刘淑艳,陶延淮,等.“解淀粉芽孢杆菌Ba168”对温室番茄生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2014(19):44-46.

[14]张丽荣,陈杭,康萍芝,等.不同微生物菌剂对番茄产量及土壤微生物数量的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2013,52(22):5452-5454,5518.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-05-31