|Table of Contents|

Pathogenic Factors Produced by Valsa mali var.mali and Their Relationship With Pathogenicity of Different Strains(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2014年13期
Page:
118-122
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Pathogenic Factors Produced by Valsa mali var.mali and Their Relationship With Pathogenicity of Different Strains
Author(s):
LI ChaoLI Bao-huaLI Gui-fangWANG Cai-xia
College of Agronomy and Plant Protection,Key Lab of Integrated Crop Pest Management of Shandong Province,Qingdao Agricultural University,Qingdao,Shandong 266109
Keywords:
Valsa mali var.malitoxinscell wall degrading enzymespathogenicity
PACS:
Q 939.9
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Taking Valsa mali var.mali of strain LXS080601 with high virulence and strain LXS081501 with weak virulence as materials,the enzyme activities and toxins were analyzed using dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods,to explore the difference of cell wall degrading enzymes and toxins produced by different strains of Valsa mali and the relationship between pathogenic factors and pathogenicity.The results showed that 5 kinds of toxins were all detected in ‘Fuji’ bark medium and detached branches inoculated with strain LXS080601 including protocatechuic acid,p-hydroxybenzoic acid,p-hydroxybenzene propanoic acid,p-hydroxyacetophenone and phloroglucinol,however,only 3~4 kinds of toxins were produced by strain LXS081501 in two treatments,respectively.The amount of the toxins produced by LXS081501 was significantly lower than that produced by LXS080601,except for phloroglucinol produced in ‘Fuji’ bark medium.In addition,two strains could produce 5 kinds of cell wall degrading enzymes including celluase,β-glucosidase,polymethylgalacturonase,xylanase and polygalacturonase,but the enzyme activities were significantly difference.The enzyme activities produced by LXS080601 were higher than that produced by LXS081501,and the corresponding days were shorter when maximum enzyme activities were detected.The results in this research indicated that a positive relationship existed between enzyme activities,amount and kinds of toxins produced by V.mali and pathogenicity of different strains.

References:

[1]陈策.苹果树腐烂病发生规律和防治研究[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2009.
[2]陈策,李美娜,史秀琴,等.苹果树腐烂病(Valsa mali  Miyabe et Yamada)侵染时期研究[J].植物病理学报,1987,17(2):65-68.
[3]曹克强,国立耘,李保华,等.中国苹果树腐烂病发生和防治情况调查[J].植物保护,2009,35(2):114-117.
[4]王彩霞,董向丽,张振芳,等.2011年烟台苹果产区腐烂病发病情况调查与原因分析[J].植物保护,2012,38(3):136-138.
[5]冯云程,阿新祥,刘自单.云南高原粳稻白叶枯病菌毒素及其与致病性关系[J].植物病理学报,2013,46(3):622-629.
[6]刘福昌,李美娜,王永洤.苹果树腐烂病菌致病因素-果胶酶的初步探讨[J].中国果树,1980(3):45-48.
[7]王娟,马强,庄霞,等.苹果树腐烂病病原菌分泌物中果胶酶的测定[J].内蒙古农业科技,2009(4):39-40.
[8]陈晓林,牛程旺,李保华,等.苹果树腐烂病菌产生细胞壁降解酶的种类及其活性分析[J].华北农学报,2012,27(2):207-212.
[9]Natsume H,Seto H,Haruo S,et al.Studies on apple canker disease.The necrotic toxins produced by  Valsa ceratosperma [J].Agriculture Biology Chemistry,1982,46(8):2101-2106.
[10]赵红,王彩霞,陈晓忍,等.苹果腐烂病菌诱导产孢方法[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(10):151-154.
[11]严吉明,叶华智.巢豆油壶菌与蚕豆相互作用下植物内源激素的动态[J].植物病理学报,2013,43(3):328-332.
[12]王彩霞,张清明,李桂舫,等.苹果树腐烂病拮抗细菌菌株BJ1鉴定及其抑菌作用[J].植物保护学报,2012,39(5):431-437.
[13]Douaiher M N,Nowak E,Durand R,et al.Correlative analysis of  Mycosphaerella graminicola  pathogenicity and cell wall degrading enzymes produced in vitro:the importance of xylanases and polygalacturonases [J].Plant Pathology,2007,56:79-86. [14]Siah A,Deweera C,Duymec F,et al.Correlation of in planta endo-beta-1,4-xylanase activity with the necrotrophic phase of the hemibiotrophic  fungus Mycosphaerella graminicola[J].Plant Pathology,2010,59:661-670.
[15]章元寿.植物病理生理学[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1996.
[16]胡颖慧,龚束芳,李彩华,等.枯萎病菌毒素培养滤液对唐菖蒲幼苗毒性的初步研究[J].植物病理学报,2012,42(5):497-504.
[17]徐娇,许文超,康占海,等.瓜果腐霉毒素对多年生黑麦草的致病作用机理初步研究[J].草业学报,2009,18(4):181-186.
[18]Zheng L,Lv R J,Huang J B,et al.Isolation,purification,and biological activity of a phytotoxin produced by  Stemphylium solani[J].Plant Disease,2010,94:1231-1237.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-02