|Table of Contents|

Effect of Different Irrigation Amount on the Growth of Three Kinds of Garden Plants(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2012年09期
Page:
71-74
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effect of Different Irrigation Amount on the Growth of Three Kinds of Garden Plants
Author(s):
ZHANG Lu1ZHANG Guo-sheng1WANG Lin-he 12WANG Bo3HAN Ruo-shuang1GAO Liang1
1.College of Ecology and Environment,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Huhhot,Inner Mongolia 010019;
2.Inner Mongolia Grass Drought Limited Company,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010019;
3.Ulaan Tolgoi Sand Control Experimental Station of Uxin Banner of Erdos,Erdos,Inner Mongolia 017313
Keywords:
Sobina vulgalis Amygdalus triloba Prunus davidianairrigation amountgrowthbiomass
PACS:
S 688
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Taking two-year-old plants of Sobina vulgalis,Amygdalus triloba and Prunus davidiana as test materials,a pot experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of different irrigation on three ornamental plants,it including four irrigation treatments: soil water content at field capacity’s 15%~25%(T1),35%~45% (T2),55%~65%(T3) and CK.The results showed that compared to CK,all the plants’ biomass increased and biggest under T3,Sobina vulgalis was 895.28 g,Amygdalus triloba was 492.01 g and Prunus davidiana was 421.86 g.In each treatment,Sobina vulgalis’ root-shoot ratio almost ware the same.For Amygdalus triloba the trend was CK>T1>T2>T3.Prunus davidiana’s decreased as increasing irrigation.All plants’ plant height and ground diameter increased as increase irrigation and significant at T3.In conclution,The drought-resistant ability of three garden plants was as follows:Sobina vulgalis>Amygdalus triloba>Prunus davidiana,Controling the soil water content at 55%~65% of the maximum field capacity was benefit for the three plants’ growth.The good reference for these three ornamental plants’ water saving cultivation were provided.

References:

[1]姚华,赵晓英,李晓梅,等.3种锦鸡儿属植物幼苗对持续干旱的生理响应[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(9):3915-3917.
[2]王瑞辉,马履一,奚如春.论城市森林建设树种选择的原则[J].中南林学院学报,2005,25(3):58-62.
[3]刘长利,王文全,崔俊茹,等.干旱胁迫对甘草光合特性与生物量分配的影响[J].中国沙漠,2006,26(1):142-145. [4]石游,李建贵,庄红梅.榆叶梅等3种园林灌木的蒸腾特性[J].林业科技开发,2011,25(4):36-41.
[5]Ranney T G,Whitlow T H,Bassuk N L.Response of five temperate deciduous tree species to water stress [J].Tree Physiol,1990,6(4):439-448. [6]Osrio J,Osrio M L,Chaves M M,et al.Water deficits aremore important in delaying growth than in changing patterns of carbon allocation in Eucalyptus globules [J].Tree Physiol,1998,18(6):363-373.
[7]王志泰,包玉.土壤水分对大叶黄杨生长量与光合作用的影响[J].草业科学,2010,27(11):95-100.
[8]王林和.臭柏生理生态学特性及种群恢复与重建[M].北京:科学出版社,2011:131-166.
[9]肖冬梅,王淼,姬兰柱.水分胁迫对长白山阔叶红松林主要树种生长及生物量分配的影响[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(5):93-97.
[10]尉秋实,赵明,李昌龙,等.不同土壤水分胁迫下沙漠葳的生长及生物量的分配特征[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(1):7-12. [11]杨海梅.水分胁迫下荒漠植被的耗水规律与生长过程的研究[D].石河子:石河子大学,2005.
[12]冯燕,王彦荣,胡小文.水分胁迫对两种荒漠灌木幼苗生长与水分利用效率的影响[J].草业科学,2011,20(4):293-298.
[13]景茂,曹福亮,汪贵斌,等.土壤水分含量对银杏生长及生物量分配的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2005,29(3):5-8.
[14]季孔庶,孙志勇,方彦.林木抗旱性研究进展[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(6):123-128.
[15]单立山,张希明,王有科,等.水分条件对塔里木沙漠公路防护林植物幼苗生长及生物量分配的影响[J].科学通报,2008,53:82-88.
[16]陈玉玲,曹敏.干旱条件下ABA与气孔导度和叶片生长的关系[J].植物生理学通讯,1999,35(5):398-403.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-09-02