|Table of Contents|

Effect of Salt Stress on Photosynthetic Diurnal Variation of Fraxinus chinesis andPopulus simonii×P.euphrati Seedlings(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2012年01期
Page:
75-78
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effect of Salt Stress on Photosynthetic Diurnal Variation of Fraxinus chinesis andPopulus simonii×P.euphrati Seedlings
Author(s):
LIU Ping1 PAN Wen-li2 WEI Zhong-ping2 WANG Yu-tao1
1. College of Forestry, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110866;
?2. Liaoning Provincial Research Institute of Forestry Science, Shenyang, Liaoning 110032
Keywords:
salt stress photosynthetic rate transpiration rate water use efficiency
PACS:
S 792.119
DOI:
-
Abstract:
The Fraxinus chinesis and Populus simonii×P.euphrati seedlings were used as experimental material to study the effect of salt stree on the photosynthetic diurnal variation. The results showed that the photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance diurnal variation of Fraxinus chinesis showed a single peak type, while Populus simonii×P.euphrati was double peak type under mild salt stress. The maximum value of photosynthetic rate of Fraxinus chinesis and Populus simonii×P.euphrati Seedlings all appeared at 8:00~10:00, the maximum value were CO29.4364 μmol?m-2.?s-1. and CO216.304 μmol?m-2.?s-1. respectively, but the water use efficiency were close. In moderate salt stress, the photosynthetic rate diurnal variation of Fraxinus chinesis was double peak type, while Populus simonii×P.euphrati was single peak type. The maximum value of photosynthetic rate of Fraxinus chinesis seedlings appeared at 8:00~10:00, while Populus simonii×P.euphrati seedlings appeared at 14:00~16:00. The maximum photosynthetic rate of Fraxinus chinesis was CO25.6575 μmol?m-2.?s-1. decreased 40% than that of mild salt stree, the maximum photosynthetic rate of Populus simonii×P.euphrati seedlings was CO24.352 μmol?m-2.?s-1. decreased 73.3% than that of mild salt stree, but the water use efficiency also were close.

References:

[1]陈文利,徐朗莱,沈文飚,等.盐胁迫下两品种大麦叶片H2O2累积及其清除酶活性的变化[J].南京农业大学学报,1998,22(2):97-100.

[2]朱会娟,王瑞刚,陈少良,等.NaCl胁迫下胡杨和群众杨抗氧化能力及耐盐性[J].生态学报,2007,27(10):4113-4121.
[3]王瑞刚,陈少良,刘力源,等.盐胁迫下3种杨树的抗氧化能力与耐盐性研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2005,27(3):46-52.
[4]王青宁.六种沙地灌木的抗盐生理研究[M].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008.
[5]曹帮华.刺槐抗旱抗盐特性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2005.
[6]陶晶.东北主要杨树抗盐机理及抗性品种选育的研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2002.
[7]杨敏生,李艳华,梁海永,等.白杨派杂种无性系及其亲本光合和生长对盐胁迫的反应[J].林业科学,2006,42(4):19-26.
[8]熊亮.江苏沿海重盐碱土区土壤盐分动态与耐盐植物筛选研究[M].南京:南京林业大学,2008.
[9]孟康敏,杨秀清,潘文利,等.辽宁滨海盐碱地土壤改良及造林技术研究[J].林业科学,1997,33(1):25-33.
[10]马焕成,陈少良,王沙生.脱落酸与胡杨抗盐性的关系[J].西南林学院学报,1998,18(3):8-14.
[11]陈少良,李金克,尹伟伦,等.盐胁迫条件下杨树组织及细胞中钾、钙、镁的变化[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(56):84-88.
[12]马焕成,王沙生,蒋湘宁.盐胁迫下胡杨的光合和生长响应[J].西南林学院学报,1998,18(1):33-41.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-23