|Table of Contents|

Comprehensive Evaluation on Substrates for Phalaenopsis Culture by Membership Function Method

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2025年8
Page:
72-81
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comprehensive Evaluation on Substrates for Phalaenopsis Culture by Membership Function Method
Author(s):
WANG Shiyao; ZHANG Guo; YANG Shucai; WANG Ruihua; JIANG Shuanli; WANG Jun
(Zhengzhou Academy of Agriculture and Technology Sciences，Zhengzhou，Henan 450005)
Keywords:
Phalaenopsis; substrates; physicochemical properties; growth and development; membership function method; comprehensive evaluation
PACS:
S 682.31
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20244257
Abstract:
Taking Phalaenopsis amabilis cv.formosum and Phlaenopsis ‘Zhengnong Huofenghuang’ as the experimental materials,total of six treatments were established in different compounding modes，namely T1(V(pindstrups phagnum peat))，T2(V(coconut chunks))，T3(V(domestic sphagnum moss)∶V(pindstrups phagnum peat)=1∶1)，T4(V(domestic sphagnum moss)∶V(coconut chunks)=1∶1)，T5(V(domestic sphagnum moss)∶V(sawdust-compound)=1∶1)，CK(domestic sphagnum moss)，using the membership function method to study the effects of substrates on the growth and development of Phalaenopsis under various treatments，in order to provide reference for improving the quality and efficiency of the Phalaenopsis industry.The results showed that the bulk density，porosity，gas-water ratio，pH and EC value before and after cultivation of each treatment substrates could meet the normal growth conditions of Phalaenopsis except for the lower water-holding porosity of T2.The survival rate of the two Phalaenopsis varieties under each treatment was more than 87.50%，and the survival rate of P.‘Zhengnong Huofenghuang’ was higher.The leaf size and crown width of the two Phalaenopsis varieties under different treatments showed an ‘S’-shaped curve，and the overall growth of T3 and T1 were better than other treatments at 330 days of planting.During the flowering stage，both pedical length and inflorescence length in T3，CK，and T1 exhibited significant increases.Regarding flowering quality，while T2 was markedly lower than CK，no substantial differences were observed between the others.Comparison to CK，the utilization costs of various treatment substrates decreased by approximately 34.33%-36.76%.Considering both cost-effectiveness and Phalaenopsis growth performance，T3 and T1 achieved the highest comprehensive evaluation coefficients，indicated their suitability for cultivating Phalaenopsis in potted conditions.Additionally，T4 closely resembled CK and could also serve as an ideal substrate formulation for cultivation.

References:

［1］王一帆，邹荣松，孙向阳，等．高持水性成型有机栽培基质研究进展［J］．浙江农林大学学报，2022，39(2)：446-455.［2］马凡强，简尊吉，郭泉水，等．不同农林废弃物混合基质对崖柏扦插育苗的影响［J］．应用生态学报，2023，34(7)：1817-1824.［3］尉吉乾，李丹，王京文，等．农林废弃物的资源化利用研究进展［J］．中国农学通报，2023，39(6)：77-81．［4］宋爽，郭远，张殿朋，等.不同树种林业废弃物对大球盖菇栽培的影响［J］．北方园艺，2024(20)：110-118.［5］王保平，周静，史向远，等．不同农业废弃物复合基质对西瓜光合特性、产量和品质的影响［J］．河南农业科学，2021，50(6)：116-124.［6］AMERI A，TEHRANIFAR A，DAVARYNEJAD G，et al．Flowering times and some growth indicators of strawberry were affected by physical properties of the growing media［J］．Scientia Horticulturae，2020，272：109601.［7］刘红，马辉，魏晓羽，等．轻基质配比对春兰生长和生理生化特性影响的综合评价［J］．江苏农业科学，2024，52(7)：133-142.［8］王世尧，张果，杨书才，等．基于表型的蝴蝶兰花色数量分类［J］．热带作物学报，2023，44(11)：2227-2235.［9］薛光卿.我国蝴蝶兰产业规模增长迅速［N］.中国花卉报，2024-04-11 (001).［10］黄歆怡，覃茜，谢振兴，等．蝴蝶兰属植物及其现状研究［J］．农业研究与应用，2018，31(1)：42-47.［11］ZHANG D，ZHAO X W，LI Y Y，et al．Advances and prospects of orchid research and industrialization［J］．Horticulture Research，2022（9）：220.［12］RUNKLE E，WANG Y T，BLANCHARD M，et al.Growing the Best Phalaenopsis：Part 2：Media，transplanting，water and nutrient requirements［J］.Orchids，2007，7(6):106-111.［13］曲晓慧，张宁宁，刘晨，等．不同栽培基质配比与施肥模式对蝴蝶兰生长发育的影响［J］．浙江农业科学，2023，64(9)：2191-2196.［14］杨振华．蝴蝶兰栽培基质的研究［D］．北京：北京林业大学，2008.［15］李耀龙，季延海，于平彬，等．基于不同基质理化特性的无土栽培混合基质筛选［J］．北方园艺，2016(8)：36-40.［16］郭世荣．固体栽培基质研究、开发现状及发展趋势［J］．农业工程学报，2005，21(S2)：1-4.［17］ABAD M，NOGUERA P，BURS S．National inventory of organic wastes for use as growing media for ornamental potted plant production：Case study in Spain［J］．Bioresource Technology，2001，77(2)：197-200.［18］KONDURU S，EVANS M R，STAMPS R H．Coconut husk and processing effects on chemical and physical properties of coconut coir dust［J］．HortScience，34(1)：88-90.［19］左程胜.蝴蝶兰新型基质的研究与开发［D］.南京:南京农业大学，2023.［20］郭文姣，张京伟，孙纪霞，等．不同外源钙物质对蝴蝶兰栽培基质水苔EC值和pH值的影响［J］．山东农业科学，2017，49(11)：48-51.［21］周新伟，王海候，陆长婴，等．稻秸秆与二种不同废弃物堆腐制备基质的研究［J］．中国土壤与肥料，2020(1)：147-152.［22］岳莉然，刘铭宇，陈胜艳，等．不同轻型可再生基质对盆栽菊花生长的影响［J］．河南农业科学，2023，52(4)：116-126.［23］HWANG S J，HUH M R，CHUNG J I，et al．Growth of Phalaenopsis in a recirculating ebb and flood hydroponic system as affected by ionic strength of solution and medium composition［J］．Acta Horticulturae，2004(659)：637-645.［24］王保平，周静，史向远，等．不同配比杏鲍菇渣基质对西瓜生长及光合特性的影响［J］．北方园艺，2021(21)：8-15.［25］袁必局，李香，张叶，等．不同基质材料对迷你型蝴蝶兰生长及开花性状的影响［J］．分子植物育种，2023，21(20)：6933-6938.［26］李红．蝴蝶兰组培苗对不同移栽基质的适应性［J］．北方园艺，2021(1)：53-58.［27］白瑞琴，郭燕忠，孟文慧，等．蝴蝶兰品种‘大辣椒’新优栽培基质的筛选［J］．北方园艺，2023(11)：68-74.［28］张京伟，孙纪霞，张英杰，等．蝴蝶兰替代基质理化性状及应用成本分析［J］．安徽农业科学，2019，47(14)：39-41.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2025-05-12