|Table of Contents|

Comprehensive Analysis of the Difference of Response of Different Tomato Varieties to Water Deficit

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2025年8
Page:
25-34
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comprehensive Analysis of the Difference of Response of Different Tomato Varieties to Water Deficit
Author(s):
WANG Wenxuan1; 2; 3; LIU Mingchi1; 2; 3; CHEN Jie1; 2; 3; LIANG Hao1; 2; 3; XIE Long1; 2; 3; JI Yanhai1; 2; 3
(1.Vegetable Research Institute，Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences，Beijing 100097；2.National Vegetable Engineering Technology Research Center，Beijing 100097；3.North China Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture，Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs，Beijing 100097)
Keywords:
deficit irrigation; tomato; variety; quality; comprehensive analysis
PACS:
S 641.1
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20244007
Abstract:
Taking ‘Jingfan 308’ (JF308)，‘Jingfan 309’ (JF309)，‘Yuanwei No.1’ (YW1)，‘Guanghui 201’ (GH201)，‘Yashu 006’ (YS006)，‘Yashu 12’ (YS12)，‘Jingcai 6’ (JC6) and ‘Jingcai 8’ (JC8) as the test materials，normal irrigation (2.0 L) and deficit irrigation (1.5 L and 1.0 L) methods were used to study the response of eight fresh high-quality tomatoes to different levels of deficit and the appropriate deficit irrigation amount for each variety,in order to provide reference for tomato quality improvement and scientific irrigation.The results showed that deficit irrigation reduced the growth index and photosynthetic parameters of different tomato varieties，and the plant height of different tomato varieties decreased significantly.Under the irrigation amount of 1.5 L·d-1 and 1.0 L·d-1，the difference in stem diameter was not significant，but the transpiration rate was the most inhibited.With the increase of deficit degree，the vitamin C of JC8 increased the most，which was 143.92% higher than that of 2.0 L·d-1 irrigation.The vitamin C content of JF308 was the least increased，which was 31.79% higher than that of 2.0 L·d-1irrigation.The soluble sugar and titratable acid content of 1.0 L·d-1 irrigation amount of different tomato varieties were improved to varying degrees compared with 2.0 L·d-1.The deficit irrigation had a greater impact on the yield per plant of JF309，and the drought tolerance was also relatively weak.Compared with the 1.5 L·d-1irrigation amount，the degree of decline of each variety at 1.0 L·d-1 was significantly reduced.Principal component analysis showed that vitamin C and soluble sugar content could explain the key indexes of tomato varieties under deficit irrigation.JF308，YW1，GH201，YS006，JC6 and JC8 were suitable for deficit irrigation of 1.0 L·d-1，YS12 was suitable for deficit irrigation of 1.5 L·d-1，and 1.0 L·d-1 will reduce its comprehensive benefits.The comprehensive benefit of JF309 did not change much under deficit，and the effect of water saving and weight loss could be achieved through deficit irrigation.In actual production，the corresponding deficit irrigation amount should be selected for different varieties to improve the quality of tomato with less reduction in growth and yield.

References:

［1］周明，李常保．我国番茄种业发展现状及展望［J］．蔬菜，2022(5)：6-10.［2］KOWALCZYK K，GAJC-WOLSKA J，RADZANOWSKA J，et al．Assesment of chemical composition and sensory quality of tomato fruit depending on cultivar and growing conditions［J］．Acta Scientiarum Polonorum-hortorum Cultus，2011（10）：133-140.［3］MUKHERJEE S，DASH P K，DAS D，et al．Growth，yield and water productivity of tomato as influenced by deficit irrigation water management［J］．Environmental Processes，2023，10(1)：10.［4］袁丁，武占会，季延海，等．限根栽培条件下空气果穗部加温对深冬设施番茄产量和品质的影响［J］．北方园艺，2020(11)：7-12.［5］王瑞，刘晓奇，颉博杰，等．水分亏缺对番茄果实外观品质和糖酸组分的动态调控［J］．西北农业学报，2023，32(9)：1356-1364.［6］金宁．水分调控番茄关键品质形成的机理研究［D］．兰州：甘肃农业大学，2023.［7］WANG Z，LIU Z，ZHANG Z，et al．Subsurface drip irrigation scheduling for cucumber (Cucumis sativus L．) grown in solar greenhouse based on 20cm standard pan evaporation in NorthEast China［J］．Scientia Horticulturae，2009，123(1)：51-57.［8］董宝娣，刘会灵，王亚凯，等．作物高效用水生理生态调控机制研究［J］．中国生态农业学报，2018，26(10)：1465-1475.［9］车子强，涂洪铭，蔡静怡，等．亏缺灌溉对新疆不同品种春小麦产量和氮素利用的影响［J］．植物营养与肥料学报，2024，30(5)：886-898.［10］李小忠．不同玉米品种耐旱性对水密互作响应的生理机制［D］．呼和浩特：内蒙古农业大学，2021.［11］LU J，SHAO G，GAO Y，et al．Effects of water deficit combined with soil texture，soil bulk density and tomato variety on tomato fruit quality：A meta-analysis［J］．Agricultural Water Management，2021，243：106427.［12］蔡润，孙正梁，胡京昂，等．不同口感型番茄品种的品质鉴定及多元统计分析［J］．中国蔬菜，2023(11)：87-97.［13］马越，李玉姗，王帆，等．番茄种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合评价及筛选［J］．植物遗传资源学报，2024，25(7)：1056-1069.［14］张文博，刘芸希，李国铭，等．盐碱地栽培条件下8份野生型番茄种质田间综合性状评价［J］．江苏农业科学，2024，52(3)：173-178.［15］刘增鑫．特种蔬菜无土栽培［M］．北京：中国农业出版社，2000.［16］郭世荣．无土栽培学［M］.2版．北京：中国农业出版社，2011.［17］李合生．植物生理生化实验原理和技术［M］．北京：高等教育出版社，2000.［18］曹建康，姜微波，赵玉梅．果蔬采后生理生化实验指导［M］．北京：中国轻工业出版社，2007.［19］邹琦．植物生理学实验指导［M］．北京：中国农业出版社，2000.［20］高俊凤．植物生理学实验指导［M］．北京：高等教育出版社，2006.［21］国家卫生和计划生育委员会，国家食品药品监督管理总局．食品安全国家标准 食品中果糖、葡萄糖、蔗糖、麦芽糖、乳糖的测定：GB 5009.8-2016［S］．北京：中国标准出版社，2017.［22］DUCKENA L，ALKSNIS R，ERDBERGA I，et al．Non-destructive quality evaluation of 80 tomato varieties using vis-NIR spectroscopy［J］．Foods，2023，12(10)：1990.［23］孙虎，孙明茂，王成霞，等．不同灌水量下化肥减量配施生物有机肥对番茄产量及品质的影响［J］．山东农业科学，2023，55(8)：110-115.［24］仝国栋，刘洪禄，吴文勇，等．不同水分处理对茄子生长与产量品质的影响［J］．排灌机械工程学报，2013，31(6)：540-545.［25］范胜男．封闭式栽培模式下亏缺灌溉调控番茄品质技术研究［D］．邯郸：河北工程大学，2023.［26］王玉珏，付秋实，郑禾，等．干旱胁迫对黄瓜幼苗生长、光合生理及气孔特征的影响［J］．中国农业大学学报，2010，15(5)：12-18.［27］韩忠才，张川，王中原，等．水分亏缺下不同基因型马铃薯幼苗光合同化功能比较研究［J］．东北师大学报(自然科学版)，2023，55(2)：126-133.［28］ZHANG H J，WEN A C，ZHANG J D．Effect of regulated deficit irrigation on water use and economic benefit of processing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) in an arid environment［J］．Advanced Materials Research，2014，926/927/928/929/930：4234-4237.［29］王峰，杜太生，邱让建．基于品质主成分分析的温室番茄亏缺灌溉制度［J］．农业工程学报，2011，27(1)：75-80．

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2025-05-08