|Table of Contents|

Comparative Study on Tissue Structure and Cold Resistance of Eight Almond Branches

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2025年7
Page:
40-48
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparative Study on Tissue Structure and Cold Resistance of Eight Almond Branches
Author(s):
Alimu·AMUTI1; 2; WANG Yu2; 3; ZHANG Rui1; 2; JIN Qiang1; 2; WANG Xinjian1; 2
(1.College of Horticulture and Forestry，Tarim University，Alar,Xinjiang 843300；2.The National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of High Efficiency and Superior-Quality Cultivation and Fruit Deep Processing Technology of Characteristic Fruit Trees，Alar,Xinjiang 843300；3.College of Life Sciences and Technology，Tarim University，Alar,Xinjiang 843300)
Keywords:
Amygdalus communis L.; cold tolerance; semi-lethal temperature; principal component analysis
PACS:
S 662.9
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20243835
Abstract:
The one-year-old deep dormant Amygdalus communis L.branches of‘Zhi Pi’‘Mission’‘Nonparein’‘Wan Feng 18’‘Xiao Shuang Ren’‘Duo Guo 02’‘Shuang Guo 12’ and ‘Amanisha’ were used as test materials,low temperature stress treatments at -28，-23，-18，-13，-8 ℃ were used,relative electric conductivity (REC)，catalase (CAT)，peroxidase (POD)，superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity，soluble sugar，free proline (Pro)，malondialdehyde (MDA)，soluble protein content and branch structure were measured to study the effect of low temperature treatment on cold resistance of one-year-old branches of amygdalus communis,in order to provide reference for the selection of high-quality Amygdalus communis L. varieties with strong cold resistance in Alar reclamation area.The results showed that semi-lethal temperature of the tested varieties was between -22.53 ℃ and -14.34 ℃,the under low temperature stress，the protective enzyme activities of the eight Amygdalus communis L. branches generally increased first and then decreased.The contents of soluble sugar，free proline and malondialdehyde increased first and then decreased with the decrease of temperature，and the contents reached the highest value when the treatment temperature was -23 ℃.The comprehensive evaluation indicated that the strength of cold resistance in 8 varieties was in the following order,‘Shuang Guo 12’>‘Nonparein’>‘Xiao Shuang Ren’>‘Mission’>‘Duo Guo 02’>‘Zhi Pi’>‘Amanisha’>‘Wan Feng 18’.

References:

［1］田建保.中国扁桃［M］.北京:中国农业出版社,2008.［2］张世红,郭丽娜,王世兰,等.扁桃枝条对低温的反应［J］.河北林果研究,2002，17(1):38-41.［3］李鹏,罗淑萍,田嘉,等.低温冻害对扁桃花蕾抗寒机制的影响［J］.经济林研究,2015,33(2):20-25.［4］王敏,李疆,李鹏,等.扁桃[STBX]AcDHN1[STBZ]基因的克隆及原核表达分析［J］.新疆农业科学,2020,57(12):2221-2229.［5］MOHAMED K S,RAMANATHAN S.Computational analysis of potential candidate genes involved in the cold stress response of ten Rosaceae members［J］.BMC Genomics,2022,23(1):510-516.［6］李薇,史菲,刘敏,等.植物响应低温的生理和分子机制研究进展［J］.北方园艺,2023(8):121-126.［7］NATH M,BHATT D,PRASAD R,et al.Reactive oxygen species generation-scavenging and signaling during plant-arbuscular mycorrhizal and Piriformospora indica interaction under stress condition［J］.Frontiers in Plant Science,2016（7）:1574-1579.［8］YESHVEKAR R K,NITNAVARE R B,CHAKRADHAR T,et al.Molecular characterization and expression analysis of pearl millet plasma membrane proteolipid 3 (Pmp3) genes in response to abiotic stress conditions［J］.Plant Gene,2017（10）:37-44.［9］曾洪学,屈兴红.葛藤对低温胁迫的生长和生理生化响应［J］.北方园艺,2022(18):109-116.［10］ZHANG Z,GU Y,MAO Q,et al.Physiological response to low temperature of four genotypes of Cyclocarya paliurus and their preliminary evaluation to cold resistance［J］.Forests,2023,14(8):1680-1688.［11］WANG Z L,WU D,HUI M,et al.Screening of cold hardiness-related indexes and establishment of a comprehensive evaluation method for grapevines (V.vinifera)［J］.Frontiers in Plant Science,2022（13）:1014330-1014338.［12］QIN G,LIU Y,LIU J,et al.Physio-biochemical insights into the cold resistance variations among nectarine (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch var.nectarina) cultivars［J］.Biology,2024,13(4):222-227.［13］NIU R,ZHAO X,WANG C,et al.Transcriptome profiling of Prunus persica branches reveals candidate genes potentially involved in freezing tolerance［J］.Scientia Horticulturae,2020,259:108775-108779.［14］NIU R,ZHAO X,WANG C,et al.Physiochemical responses and ecological adaptations of peach to low-temperature stress:Assessing the cold resistance of local peach varieties from Gansu，China［J］.Plants,2023,12(24):4183-4189.［15］李斌,刘立强,罗淑萍,等.扁桃花芽的抗寒性测定与综合评价［J］.经济林研究,2012,30(3):16-21.［16］刘梦婕.扁桃花芽抗寒相关性状及花粉特性观测［D］.乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2019.［17］阿力木·阿木提.温185和新新2号早实核桃结果枝抽干和抗寒性差异分析［D］.阿拉尔:塔里木大学,2017.［18］赵世杰,苍晶.植物生化实验原理和技术［M］.北京:中国农业出版社,2015.［19］FUNG R,WANG C,SMITH D,et al.Correlation of increased alternative oxidase gene expression with reduced chilling injury in cold-stored tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum)［J］.HortScience,2004,39(4):806-809.［20］彭伟秀,杨建民,张芹,等.杏花器官组织抗寒性研究［J］.果树学报,2002,19(2):108-110.［21］潘晓云,王根轩,曹琴东.兰州地区引种的美国扁桃的越冬伤害与临界致死低温［J］.园艺学报,2002,29(1):63-65.［22］焦其庆,冯立娟,尹燕雷,等.石榴冻害及抗寒评价研究进展［J］.植物生理学报,2019,55(4):425-432.［23］庄星月,李文胜,张颖慧,等.阿克苏地区9种苹果砧穗组合枝条的抗寒性评价［J］.经济林研究,2024,42(1):274-283,303.［24］周书娟,王飞,田治国,等.新疆‘树上干’杏耐寒株系的鉴定与筛选［J］.园艺学报,2011,38(10):1976-1982.［25］董婧妍.河北省桃品种冻害调查及部分品种抗寒力评价［D］.秦皇岛:河北科技师范学院,2022.［26］闫忠业,吕天星,王冬梅,等.低温下六个苹果新品种抗性生理指标的比较［J］.植物生理学报,2015,51(1):93-96.［27］魏鑫,王升,王兴东,等.不同蓝莓品种对低温处理的生理响应及抗寒性评价［J］.河南农业科学,2023,52(8):115-125.［28］欧欢.不同扁桃品种抗寒性研究［D］.阿拉尔:塔里木大学,2019.［29］金君,韦欣霈,宋任锋,等.软枣猕猴桃抗寒性研究进展［J］.北方园艺,2023(12):137-143.［30］刘兴禄,王红平,孙文泰,等.5个砧木苹果枝条的抗寒性评价［J］.果树学报,2021,38(8):1264-1274.［31］张旭,朱珍珍,孙鲁龙,等.陇东地区不同矮化中间砧对‘长富2号’苹果抗寒性的影响［J］.果树学报,2020,37(7):985-996.［32］CANSEV A,GULEN H,ERIS A.Cold-hardiness of olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars in cold-acclimated and non-acclimated stages:Seasonal alteration of antioxidative enzymes and dehydrin-like proteins［J］.The Journal of Agricultural Science,2009,147(1):51-61.［33］赵通,赵军营,张德,等.8个扁桃品种的生理解剖特性及其抗寒性比较研究［J］.干旱区资源与环境,2024,38(6):182-190.［34］潘晓云,曹琴东,王根轩.膜脂过氧化作为扁桃品种抗寒性鉴定指标研究［J］.生态学报,2002，22(11):1902-1911.［35］卢精林,李丹,祁晓婷,等.低温胁迫对葡萄枝条抗寒性的影响［J］.东北农业大学学报,2015,46(4):36-43.［36］张博,刘立强,秦伟,等.新疆野苹果抗寒生理生化机制研究［J］.经济林研究,2021,39(4):60-68.［37］陈仁伟,张晓煜,杨豫,等.‘赤霞珠’酿酒葡萄根颈和不同根系部位抗寒性比较［J］.生态学杂志,2021,40(9):2754-2762.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2025-04-16