|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Fertilization Treatments on Apple Fruit Quality and Soil Physicochemical Traits

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2025年8
Page:
123-130
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Fertilization Treatments on Apple Fruit Quality and Soil Physicochemical Traits
Author(s):
YANG MengyuYANG YifanTANG YuweiXU LinyunHE MengyaTIAN Bangqing
(Agricultural Science Research Institute of the Fourth Division,Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps,Kekedala,Xinjiang 835000)
Keywords:
applefertilization treatmentsoil nutrientfruit quality
PACS:
S 661.1
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20243753
Abstract:
Taking apple ‘Asentek’ as the test material,different fertilization experiments were conducted in the apple orchard of the 9th Company of the 61st Regiment.Three treatments were set up,increasing potassium sulfate fertilizer on the basis of conventional fertilization (T1),increasing potassium fulvate fertilizer on the basis of conventional fertilization (T2),and local fertilization method (CK).The changes in soil physical and chemical properties,bulk density,porosity,and nutrient content in the orchard,as well as the quality of apple fruits were studied,in order to provide reference for improving the soil fertilization method and apple quality cultivation and production in Yili area.The results showed that the addition of potassium sulfate and potassium fulvate fertilizers regulated soil pH,reduced the contents of water soluble total salts,increased soil organic matter and nutrient content in different soil layers,and also reduced soil bulk density and improved soil permeability.Compared with CK,T1 and T2 treatments significantly increased the contents of soluble sugar and vitamin C,with increases of 11.82%,19.74% and 14.85%,29.71% respectively,and reduced the content of titratable acid,with decreases of 18.18% and 30.30%,improving the quality of fruits.Overall,the effect of increasing potassium fulvate fertilizer was better than that of increasing potassium sulfate fertilizer.

References:

[1]郭明,马利萍,李凯,等.不同砧木对普通型和短枝型富士系苹果花芽分化的影响[J].西北农业学报,2024,33(1):77-89.[2]周江涛,李壮,赵德英,等.栽植时期对新疆伊犁苹果幼树生长的影响[J].中国果树,2022(6):1-5.[3]包日在,孔海民,李岗,等.基施黄腐酸钾对大棚杨梅营养生长及果实品质的影响[J].中国南方果树,2024,53(3):171-174.[4]康专苗,何凤平,刘清国,等.不同施肥处理对红玉杧及土壤的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2022(5):84-91.[5]刘娜,谢畅,黄海云,等.施钾量对花生根系和根瘤特性、养分吸收及产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2023,56(4):635-648.[6]田钰君,许云飞,郭延平.叶面喷施钾肥对无花果光合生理和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2023,51(7):126-132.[7]孔繁荣,李海平,郭文忠,等.干旱低温复合胁迫下黄腐酸钾对西葫芦幼苗生长和生理生化特性的影响[J].山东农业科学,2024,56(1):74-80.[8]中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978.[9]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2013.[10]别宇辉,赖永辉,赵禹,等.根灌黄腐酸钾肥对 “春见” 橘橙抗逆性及果实品质的影响[J].南方农业,2022,16(7):83-86.[11]陈海宁,高文胜,郑磊,等.硅钙钾镁肥与黄腐酸钾配施对酸化果园土壤化学性质及苹果产量和品质的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2023(3):82-87.[12]张春媛,樊华,郑陆万,等.不同类型钾肥对滴灌甜菜产量及钾肥利用的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2023(11):74-83.[13]王天,宋佳承,闫士朋,等.钾肥施用量对油橄榄根系发育及根际土壤微环境的影响[J].经济林研究,2020,38(3):153-163.[14]房有鑫,曹帮华,郭龙梅,等.黄腐酸钾对不同氯盐胁迫下桧柏生长的缓解效应[J].林业科学,2024,60(4):99-108.[15]才金玲,谢玉洁,刘兰军,等.腐殖酸的性质及应用进展[J].应用化工,2023,52(12):3418-3422,3427.[16]孔令冉,董雯昕,杨天一,等.腐植酸在改良和培肥土壤中的作用[J].腐植酸,2019(1):7-12.[17]高伟,李明悦,杨军,等.黄腐酸钾不同用量对番茄产量、品质及土壤理化性质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(33):46-49.[18]张路,吴军虎,杨晓伟,等.施加黄腐酸钾对黑垆土土壤结构的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2022,41(10):131-138.[19]张水勤,袁亮,林治安,等.腐植酸促进植物生长的机理研究进展[J].腐植酸,2018(1):46.[20]候小琴,王莹,余贝,等.黄腐酸钾提高水稻秧苗耐盐性的作用途径分析[J].中国水稻科学,2024,38(4):409-421.[21]师杨杰,靳红梅,管益东,等.生物腐殖酸对番茄产量、品质和土壤养分含量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2023,39(8):1739-1746.[22]孙希武,彭福田,肖元松,等.硅钙钾镁肥配施黄腐酸钾对土壤酶活性及桃幼树生长的影响[J].核农学报,2020,34(4):870-877.[23]孙风霞,张晓敏,陈德福,等.配比施肥对猕猴桃生长、含水率及果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2025(5):31-38.[24]刘强,李苗苗,何亚兰,等.黄土丘陵区不同施肥措施对土壤肥力及土壤酶活性的影响[J].北方园艺,2023(21):78-85.[25]余高,陈芬,王海.有机肥替代化肥对土壤养分、酶活性及太子参产质量的影响[J].北方园艺,2023(14):79-86.[26]吕金林,王宇超,毛祝新,等.不同施肥处理对贯叶连翘生长及药用成分含量的影响[J].北方园艺,2023(8):94-100.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2025-05-12