|Table of Contents|

Effects of Returning Bacterial Residue to Field on Soil Nutrients，Rhizosphere Bacterial Community and Yield of Cucumber in Greenhouse

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2025年6
Page:
111-120
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Returning Bacterial Residue to Field on Soil Nutrients，Rhizosphere Bacterial Community and Yield of Cucumber in Greenhouse
Author(s):
WANG Yanli1; ZHOU Juan2; WEI Feng1; LI Meihua1; HU Hao1; ZHANG Yahong1
(1.College of Wine and Horticulture，Ningxia University，Yinchuan，Ningxia 750021；2.College of Forestry and Prataculture，Ningxia University，Yinchuan，Ningxia 750021)
Keywords:
returning bacterial residue to field; soil nutrients; rhizosphere bacterial community; cucumber; yield
PACS:
S 642.2
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20242363
Abstract:
Taking mushroom residue，soil and cucumber as the test materials，and different volume ratio of bacteria and residue were used to return to the field.Five treatments with 10% (T1)，20% (T2)，30% (T3)，40% (T4)，50% (T5) of mushroom residue volume were designed，and the soil without mushroom residue was used as the control (CK).The differences of physical and chemical properties，rhizosphere bacterial community and yield of cucumber rhizosphere soil under different treatments were studied,in order to screen out the best matrix formula suitable for cucumber growth and development，and provide a reference for increasing the utilization efficiency and economic benefits of mushroom residue.The results showed that,1）compared with CK，mushroom residue returning significantly reduced soil bulk density and pH，but increased soil EC value.Among them，the contents of total nitrogen (TN)，alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen (AN)，total phosphorus (TP) and available phosphorus (AP) in soil under T4 treatment increased the most compared with CK.2) The activities of catalase and urease in T4 treatment were significantly higher than those in CK，and the activities of alkaline phosphatase and sucrase in T3 treatment were significantly higher than those of CK.3) Observed _ specie index of T4 treatment was significantly higher than that of CK，Chao1 index of T5 treatment was significantly higher than that of CK，T5 was the highest，Shannon index and Simpson index of T4 treatment were significantly higher than those of CK；the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteriota increased，while the relative abundance of Chloroflexi and Acidobacteriota decreased.The relative abundance of Gemmatimonadaceae decreased，while the relative abundance of Pseudomonadaceae，Bacillaceae and Rhizobiaceae increased.4) Compared with CK，different volumes of mushroom residue could increase the yield of cucumber，and the yield of 667 m2 in T4 treatment was the highest，which was 6 094.8 kg，which was 35.88% higher than that of CK.In summary，different proportions of bacterial residue returning to the field could improve soil physical and chemical properties，enzyme activity，microbial diversity and cucumber yield to varying degrees.

References:

［1］景全荣.我国食用菌机械化生产现状及发展趋势［J］.中国农机监理,2020(9):23-24.［2］李贺,郭海滨,魏雅冬.农作物秸秆及食用菌菌渣等农业废弃物资源化利用现状分析［J］.现代农业研究,2022,28(5):17-19.［3］吴建华.黑木耳废弃菌渣对环境的影响以及环保处理再利用［J］.农村牧区机械化,2019(3):44-45.［4］王伟霞,张之麒,李淑格,等.食用菌菌渣资源化利用研究进展［J］.现代园艺,2023(13):59-61.［5］冷鹏,刘召部,李西强,等.食用菌菌渣生产微生物有机肥研究进展［J］.湖北农业科学,2021,60(S1):17-19.［6］赵立琴,范博文,杨凤军,等.双孢菇菌渣堆肥基质对番茄育苗效果的影响［J］.北方园艺,2023(21):15-22.［7］张亭,韩建东,李瑾,等.食用菌菌渣综合利用与研究现状［J］.山东农业科学,2016,48(7):146-150.［8］郭远,宋爽,高琪,等.食用菌菌渣资源化利用进展［J］.食用菌学报,2022,29(2):103-114.［9］卫智涛,周国英,胡清秀.食用菌菌渣利用研究现状［J］.中国食用菌,2010,29(5):3-6,11.［10］张兵,苏淑钗,陈凤,等.菌渣覆盖对榛子园土壤酶活性及理化性质的影响［J］.经济林研究,2015,33(1):33-38.［11］李用芳,李学梅,李鹤宾.香菇木屑菌渣营养成分分析及在平菇菌种生产中的应用［J］.微生物学杂志,2001,21(3):59-60.［12］赵志白,刘美菊,季光孟,等.单季稻施用食用菌废菌棒的效果［J］.浙江农业科学,2010,51(4):801-802.［13］耿和田,王旭东,石思博,等.菌渣与化肥配施对稻田土壤微生物群落组成及多样性的影响［J］.环境科学,2023,44(4):2338-2347.［14］赵自超,赵时锋,张宏启,等.菌渣还田对设施瓜菜产量、品质和土壤肥力的影响［J］.中国农学通报,2021,37(19):112-118.［15］滕青,曾梦凤,林慧凡,等.菌渣还田对生菜生长、土壤养分及酶活性的影响研究［J］.中国农学通报,2020,36(6):30-36.［16］宋佳泽.农业废弃物还田对设施黄瓜生长及根际代谢的影响［D］.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2021.［17］李晓甜.菌渣利用对设施黄瓜连作土壤特性及植株生长的影响［D］.泰安:山东农业大学,2022.［18］孙凯宁,王克安,杨宁.菌渣隔层对设施土壤主要离子含量和黄瓜品质的影响［J］.山东农业科学,2018,50(5):81-86.［19］刘泉位，张天国，杜娟，等.四川米仓山水青冈原生林与杉木人工林土壤酶化学计量特征［J］.西华师范大学学报(自然科学版)，2024（4）：1-8.［20］关松荫.土壤酶及其研究方法［M］.北京：农业出版社，1986.［21］李明德,吴海勇,聂军,等.稻草及其循环利用后的有机废弃物还田效用研究［J］.中国农业科学,2010,43(17):3572-3579.［22］田波,时连辉,王秀峰,等.菇渣堆肥对土壤及草坪生长的影响［J］.中国草地学报,2011,33(5):101-106.［23］谢放,杨建北,李建宏,等.香菇渣和平菇渣对土壤钾、磷元素含量及pH值影响的比较研究［J］.吉林农业科学,2012,37(4):18-20,44.［24］胡留杰,李燕,田时炳,等.菌渣还田对菜地土壤理化性状、微生物及酶活性的影响研究［J］.中国农学通报,2020,36(1):98-104.［25］洪琦,赵勇,陈明杰,等.大球盖菇菌渣原位还田对土壤有机质、酶活力及细菌多样性的影响［J］.食用菌学报,2022,29(1):27-35.［26］汪张懿,宗良纲,褚慧,等.有机肥分解及其对土壤有机碳矿化影响的模拟研究［J］.农业环境科学学报,2013,32(1):36-42.［27］温广蝉,叶正钱,王旭东,等.菌渣还田对稻田土壤养分动态变化的影响［J］.水土保持学报,2012,26(3):82-86.［28］刘鸣达,王秋凝,魏佳伦,等.羊粪-菇渣蚓粪与化肥配施对油麦菜产量及品质的影响［J］.生态学杂志,2019,38(6):1760-1766.［29］肖嫩群,沈宝明,谭周进,等.紫云英还田方式对烟田土壤微生物及酶的影响［J］.核农学报,2010,24(1):130-135.［30］卢小露,蔚玉红,樊静华,等.绿肥还田对土壤改良及哈密瓜产量和品质的影响［J］.上海蔬菜,2024(2):51-53,75.［31］陈宏昊，唐小付，聂圣贤，等.不同基质配比下黄瓜根际细菌群落结构及多样性分析［J］.热带作物学报，2024，45（3）:641-652.［32］仲阳，程旭，王万兴，等.泥炭和菇渣施加对南方冬闲稻田有机质、马铃薯产量和土壤微生物群落结构和功能的影响［C］//马铃薯产业与种业创新（2022）：黑龙江科学技术出版社，2022.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2025-04-03