|Table of Contents|

Correlation Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruit Quality of Fifteen Apple Varieties in the Longdong Region of Gansu Province

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年21
Page:
15-22
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Correlation Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruit Quality of Fifteen Apple Varieties in the Longdong Region of Gansu Province
Author(s):
CAO Yafeng; YANG Ximeng; ZHANG Biao
(Pingliang Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Pingliang,Gansu 744000)
Keywords:
Longdong area of Gansu Province; apple; fruit quality; grey correlation analysis
PACS:
S 661.1
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20242079
Abstract:
Taking 15 varieties of apple as the test materials,the fruit quality indexes of 9 items (single fruit mass，fruit shape index，peeling hardness，soluble solids content，titrable acid content，solid-acid ratio，a* value，b* value and L* value) were studied.The fruit quality was comprehensively analyzed and evaluated by grey correlation degree method，in order to provide reference for variety upgrading in Longdong area of Gansu Province.The results showed that,the single fruit quality of ‘Honey Crisp’ was the highest，the fruit shape index，a* value and L* value of ‘Hong Fudi’ were the highest，the hardness of ‘Qin Crisp’ was the highest，the titrable acid content was the lowest，the solid-acid ratio was the highest，the soluble solids content of ‘Aifei’ was the highest，and the b* value of ‘Red Prince’ was the lowest.The coefficient of variation of solid acid ratio was the largest (35.19%)，and the coefficient of variation of fruit shape index was the smallest (4.34%).Titrable acid content was extremely significant negative correlated with solid acid ratio (P<0.01)，a* value was extremely significant positive correlated with fruit shape index，soluble solids content and L* value，and was extremely significant negative correlated with solid-acid ratio and b* value (P<0.05)，and L* value was significantly or negatively correlated with solid-acid ratio and b* value.The grey correlation analysis showed that the top three varieties with equal total correlation value and weighted correlation value were ‘Qinqiu’ ‘Chengji No.1’ and ‘Ruiyang’，which could be popularized and applied in Longdong area of Gansu Province as varieties with excellent comprehensive quality.

References:

［1］李鹏鹏．静宁苹果品种结构分析及新品种引种观察［D］．杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2019.［2］佘为为．部分苹果新品种在陇东地区的栽培表现评价［D］．杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2016.［3］吴慢慢．黄土高原苹果新品种栽培现状调查分析［D］．杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2015.［4］时晓磊,丁孙磊,丛花,等．夏播大豆产量相关性状灰色关联度分析［J］．新疆农业科学,2023,60(7):1641-1652.［5］张慧敏,耿若飞,王二伟,等．灰色关联度分析和DTOPSIS法在综合评价大豆新品种(系)中的应用［J］．大豆科技,2022(2):14-21.［6］解云,郭世华．谷子品种农艺性状的灰色关联度分析及综合评价［J］．分子植物育种,2021,19(6):2064-2072.［7］逯涛,曾庆涛,张文,等．主成分分析及灰色关联度分析综合评价棉花产量与品质［J］．新疆农业科学,2023,60(5):1099-1109.［8］张子豪,李想成,吴昊天,等．基于灰色关联度分析和聚类分析的丰产高效小麦品种综合评价与筛选［J］．江苏农业科学,2022,50(10):194-200.［9］梁万鹏,何振富,李晓莉,等．玉米新品种主要农艺性状与产量灰色关联度分析［J］．饲料研究,2022,45(11):80-84.［10］杨璐,卢晓丽,程平,等．基于灰色关联度和主成分分析法的桑葚品质综合评价体系构建［J］．新疆农业科学,2017,54(5):862-870.［11］孙耀文,马迎梅,王树森,等．内蒙古西部野生酸枣种质资源的评价与分析［J］．北方园艺,2023(17):25-34．［12］王贤玉,金方伦．桃果实单果质量与品质变化的灰色关联度分析［J］．天津农业科学,2017,23(11):61-64,76.［13］孙颖,刘儒,雷小林,等．日本野漆树果实品质的灰色关联度分析［J］．中南林业科技大学学报,2017,37(4):38-43.［14］华明艳,宋兰芳,崔少杰,等．天津引种“京香” 系列草莓新品种的灰色关联度分析［J］．北方园艺,2017(16):71-74.［15］赵亮亮,赵德英,闫帅,等．玉露香梨果实品质与叶片和果实矿质元素灰色关联度分析［J］．中国果树,2023(2):11-16,30.［16］匡立学,聂继云,李银萍,等．中国不同地区‘富士’苹果品质评价［J］．中国农业科学,2020,53(11):2253-2263.［17］王轩,毕金峰,刘璇,等．不同产地红富士苹果品质的灰色关联度分析［J］．食品科学,2013,34(23):88-91.［18］国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会．鲜苹果:GB/T 10651—2008［S］．北京:中国标准出版社,2008.［19］冯建文,韩秀梅,宋莎,等．灰色关联度分析和DTOPSIS法在贵州威宁引进苹果综合评价中的应用［J］．南方农业学报,2022,53(11):3157-3164.［20］徐吉花,赵政阳,王雷存,等．苹果果实品质评价因子的选择研究［J］．干旱地区农业研究,2011,29(6):269-274.［21］董月菊,张玉刚,梁美霞,等．苹果果实品质主要评价指标的选择［J］．华北农学报,2011,26(S1):74-79.［22］史星雲,王立新,王亚杰,等．陕西省苹果主栽品种品质差异及相关性分析［J］．北方园艺,2013(14):11-14.［23］伍国红,李玉玲,王勇,等．基于灰色关联度对17个无核葡萄品种制干品质的评价［J］．中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2017(6):18-21.［24］沈海军,徐子昂,王文琪,等．基于熵权法、灰色关联度法和低场核磁共振检测的苹果品质评价［J］．食品工业科技,2024,45(1):231-238.［25］邓健康,刘璇,吴昕烨,等．基于层次分析和灰色关联度法的苹果(等外果)汁品质评价［J］．中国食品学报,2017,17(4):197-208.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-11-21