|Table of Contents|

Effects of Amino Acid Fertilizer and Humic Acid Fertilizer Combined With Urea on Soil Available Nitrogen and Pepper Yield

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年20
Page:
55-62
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Amino Acid Fertilizer and Humic Acid Fertilizer Combined With Urea on Soil Available Nitrogen and Pepper Yield
Author(s):
ZANG Longfei; HAN Guojun; YANG Xiaobing
(College of Resources and Environment，Gansu Agricultural University，Lanzhou，Gansu 730070)
Keywords:
pepper-soil; amino acid fertilize; humic acid fertilizer; soil available nitrogen
PACS:
S 641.3
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20240933
Abstract:
‘American red’ pepper was used as the test material.Under the same nitrogen supply level，five treatments were set up，no fertilizer (CK)，conventional fertilizer (F)，40% amino acid fertilizer N+60% urea N (FA)，40% humic acid fertilizer N+60% urea N (FH)，20% amino acid fertilizer N+20% humic acid fertilizer N+60% urea N (FAH).The effects of amino acid fertilizer and humic acid fertilizer combined with urea on soil available nitrogen，microbial biomass nitrogen content，related enzyme activity and pepper yield were studied，in order to provide reference for the fertilization mode of pepper soil in Hexi irrigation area.The results showed that the contents of nitrogen supply index and biological characteristics index in rhizosphere soil of each treatment were the highest in each soil layer.The effect of amino acid fertilizer and humic acid fertilizer combined with urea on soil total nitrogen was not obvious compared with single urea application，but the effect on soil available nitrogen，soil microbial biomass nitrogen and soil urease activity was significant.The application of amino acid fertilizer and humic acid fertilizer combined with urea could effectively increase the yield of pepper and improve the proportion of dry matter distribution of pepper.The effect of FA treatment was the most obvious in each treatment.In rhizosphere soil，the content of ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen increased by 12.69% and 27.58% respectively compared with that of urea alone.In the 0-20 cm soil layer，the content of ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen in the soil increased by 14.24% and 41.75%，respectively，compared with the single application of urea.In the 20-40 cm soil layer，the contents of ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen in the soil were increased by 21.47% and 58.85%，respectively，compared with the single application of urea.The yield increase rates of F，FA，FH and FAH treatments compared with CK per 667 m2 were 10.72%，15.19%，14.64% and 12.92%，respectively.Correlation analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between the indicators.It could be seen that the combination of amino acid and humic acid fertilizer with urea could effectively increase the soil available nitrogen content and pepper yield，and the 40% amino acid fertilizer N+60% urea N has the greatest potential for improvement in each treatment.

References:

［1］程立坤,胡悦,张亚琨,等.不同品种辣椒营养品质、辣椒红素含量的差异比较及聚类分析［J］.中国调味品,2024,49(1):133-140.［2］程杰,罗洲,肖书剑,等.辣椒、花椒及其制品辣度和麻度检测研究现状［J］.中国调味品,2023,48(6):209-215.［3］李玉东,谭德水,李子双,等.长期施用控释氮肥对潮土区麦-玉轮作作物产量的影响及土壤氮素供应特征研究［J］.山东农业科学,2024,56(1):119-125.［4］胡丹,康丽霞,李培楚,等.氮肥稳定剂对滴灌棉田土壤有效氮供应、棉花氮素吸收及利用的影响［J］.核农学报,2023,37(10):2071-2078.［5］潘飞飞,张伟豪,孙壮,等.设施种植年限对土壤铵态氮、硝态氮及硝化强度的影响［J］.中国瓜菜,2023,36(5):109-114.［6］丛日环,张丽,鲁艳红,等.长期秸秆还田下土壤铵态氮的吸附解吸特征［J］.植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(2):380-388.［7］程奇云,马娟娟,任荣,等.蓄水坑灌下施肥管理方式对土壤矿质氮分布及苹果产量的影响［J］.节水灌溉,2020(9):75-78,83.［8］ZHU X,BURGER M,DOANE T A,et al.Ammonia oxidation pathways and nitrifier denitrification are significant sources of N2O and NO under low oxygen availability［J］.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2013,110(16):6328-6333.［9］MKHABELA M S,GORDON R,BURTON D,et al.Nitrous oxide emissions and soil mineral nitrogen status following application of hog slurry and inorganic fertilisers to acidic soils under forage grass［J］.Canadian Journal of Soil Science,2008,88(2):145-151.［10］腾珍珍,袁磊,王鸿雁,等.免耕秸秆覆盖条件下尿素来源铵态氮和硝态氮的累积与垂直运移过程［J］.土壤通报,2018,49(4):919-928.［11］周慧,史海滨,郭珈玮,等.盐分与有机无机肥配施对土壤氮素矿化的影响［J］.农业机械学报,2020,51(5):295-304.［12］丁文成,何萍,周卫.我国新型肥料产业发展战略研究［J］.植物营养与肥料学报,2023,29(2):201-221.［13］鲍士旦.土壤农化分析［M］.3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.［14］PANG D B,CUI M,LIU Y G,et al.Responses of soil labile organic carbon fractions and stocks to different vegetation restoration strategies in degraded Karst ecosystems of Southwest China［J］.Ecological Engineering,2019,138:391-402.［15］关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法［M］.北京:农业出版社,1986.［16］徐大兵,焦忠久,佀国涵,等.氮肥优化对高山避雨栽培番茄产量和养分利用率的影响［J］.北方园艺,2022(5):41-46.［17］郑贝贝,赵威,刘松涛,等.不同新型尿素与普通尿素减氮配施对夏玉米氮利用、产量及土壤氮平衡的影响［J］.江苏农业科学,2024,52(2):90-97.［18］于文勇,葛祥菡,孙娅婷,等.有机肥与控释尿素配施对坡耕地土壤氮素淋溶及玉米产量的影响［J］.中国土壤与肥料,2022(12):53-60.［19］毛兵,曾悦,赖彩婷,等.减氮施肥对甘蔗生物量及土壤硝态氮和铵态氮的影响［J］.生态学杂志,2023,42(11):2604-2612.［20］尹嘉德,侯慧芝,张绪成,等.化肥与有机肥结合对旱地覆膜春小麦产量形成和土壤碱解氮累积影响［J］.水土保持学报,2021,35(2):279-287.［21］王成,李昌珍,廖钰,等.氮肥形态对槟榔幼苗全氮含量、土壤有效氮和酶活性的影响［J］.分子植物育种,2021,19(19):6564-6573.［22］韦晴雯,马月伟,肖玖金,等.林窗改造对马尾松人工林土壤有效氮的影响［J］.森林与环境学报,2021,41(2):124-131.［23］吕真真,吴向东,刘益仁,等.长期不同比例有机肥-化肥配施下红壤性水稻土氮素矿化特征［J］.中国土壤与肥料,2021(4):47-53.［24］毛海兰,付鑫,赵丹丹,等.秸秆与地膜覆盖条件下旱作玉米田土壤氮组分生长季动态［J］.水土保持学报,2018,32(4):246-254.［25］董齐琪,王海燕,杜雪,等.东北低山区典型林分类型土壤脲酶活性特征［J］.应用与环境生物学报,2023,29(3):690-695.［26］周慧,史海滨,张文聪,等.有机无机肥配施对盐渍化土壤微生物量和呼吸的影响［J］.农业工程学报,2021,37(15):86-95.［27］谷思玉,汪睿,耿泽铭,等.生物有机肥对盐渍土酶活性和腐殖质组分的影响［J］.水土保持学报,2014,28(1):147-151.［28］王文锋,李春花,黄绍文,等.不同施肥模式对设施菜田土壤微生物量碳、氮的影响［J］.植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(5):1286-1297.［29］唐海明,石丽红,文丽,等.长期施肥对双季稻田根际土壤氮素的影响［J］.生态环境学报,2023,32(3):492-499.［30］余高,陈芬,谢英荷,等.有机肥替代化肥比例对黄壤土活性有机碳及酶活性的影响［J］.中国蔬菜,2020(4):48-55.［31］宋雅欣,马茂亭,安志装,等.有机无机肥料配施对大棚辣椒与番茄产量及品质的影响［J］.华北农学报,2017,32(2):211-216.［32］史建硕,郭丽,王丽英,等.优化配方施肥对华北地区露地辣椒产量、品质和养分吸收利用的影响［J］.中国土壤与肥料,2022(2):86-92.［33］李龙.GA3与有机无机肥配施显著促进辣椒生长并改善其果实品质［J］.土壤与作物,2019,8(3):308-319.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-10-29