|Table of Contents|

Effects of Flooding Stress on Growth and Physiology Characteristics of Lagerstroemia indica L. Seedlings

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年15
Page:
60-66
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Flooding Stress on Growth and Physiology Characteristics of Lagerstroemia indica L. Seedlings
Author(s):
WANG Xiangying1; WEI Lijiao1; 2; WANG Xiaoming1; TANG Li2; QIAO Zhongquan1; PAN Zixi3
(1.Forestry and Grassland Breeding Institute,Hunan Academy of Forestry,Changsha,Hunan 410004;2.College of Forestry,Central South University of Forestry & Technology,Changsha,Hunan 410004;3.Hunan Modern Logistics College,Changsha,Hunan 410131)
Keywords:
Lagerstroemia indica L.; flooding stress; growth; physiology
PACS:
S 685.99
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20240112
Abstract:
The two-year-old seedlings of Lagerstroemia indica L. ‘Ebony Embers’,an excellent new variety of Lagerstroemia indica L.,were employed for the research object,five flooding length treatments was set up and the flooding in pots method was used to ascertain the effects of various flooding stress treatments on the growth and physiological indexes of Lagerstroemia indica L.seedlings,in order to provide reference for water management in the culture of Lagerstroemia indica L. seedlings and garden application.The results showed that Lagerstroemia indica L. could tolerate up to 14 days of flooding,with 21 days representing the maximum amount of flooding stress that the species could withstand.As the duration of flooding stress increased,the relative water content,peroxidase activity,superoxide dismutase activity,soluble protein content,net photosynthesis rate (Pn),stomatal conductance (Gs),transpiration rate (Tr),and inter-cellular CO2 concentration (Ci) of Lagerstroemia indica L. seedlings showed a decreasing trend.At 21 days of flooding,these values were significantly lower than those of the control falling by 24.29%,79.88%,18.66%,3.16%,80.45%,92.51%,93.10%,and 25.43%,respectively.They reached their lowest value at 28 days of flooding.Proline content and malondialdehyde content showed an upward trend,and increased significantly by 67.34% and 360.54%,respectively,compared with the control at 21 days of inundation,and reached the maximum at 28 days of inundation.Catalase activity showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing,and reached the maximum at 21 days,and increased significantly 252.65% over the control compared with the control.Soluble sugar content showed a trend of decreasing and then increasing and then decreasing,with the flooding 21 days being the largest,a significant increase of 19.38% over the control.The relative chlorophyll content of Lagerstroemia indica L. seedlings during the period of flooding stress did not change significantly.Water use efficiency (WUE) showed an undulating and fluctuating trend,with the control being the lowest and the flooding 21 days being higher,which was a significant higher than the control by 184.00%.Although Lagerstroemia indica L. seedlings may withstand some flooding,the duration of the flooding stress should not be longer than 14 days.

References:

［1］van BODEGOM P M,SORRELL B K,OOSTHOEK A,et al.Separating the effects of partial submergence and soil oxygen demand on plant physiology［J］.Ecology,2008,89(1):193-204.［2］甘丽萍,王晓念,曹煦悦,等.水淹胁迫对竹柳幼苗形态结构和生理特征的影响［J］.水生态学杂志,2022,43(6):102-107.［3］赵雪瑶,韩丽霞,张鸽香.淹水胁迫对美国流苏幼苗生理特性和叶片结构的影响［J］.西北植物学报,2023,43(3):410-420.［4］陈菲,曲彦婷,李黎,等.淹水胁迫对溪荪生长及生理指标的影响［J］.北方园艺,2021(13):73-77.［5］王延双,方文,王欣彤,等.水淹胁迫对红花玉兰苗木生长和生理生化特性的影响［J］.北京林业大学学报,2020,42(1):35-45.［6］梁芳,卜小英,黄秋伟,等.水淹对红花玉蕊幼苗生长及生理特性的影响［J］.西北林学院学报,2019,34(2):48-55.［7］齐琳,马娜,吴雯雯,等.无花果品种幼苗淹水胁迫的生理响应与耐涝性评估［J］.园艺学报，2015,42 (7):1273-1284.［8］蔡金峰,曹福亮,张往祥.淹水胁迫对乌桕幼苗叶片质膜透性和渗透调节物质的影响［J］.东北林业大学学报，2014,42(2):42-46.［9］庞宏东，胡兴宜，胡文杰，等.淹水胁迫对枫杨等3个树种生理生化特性的影响［J］.中南林业科技大学学报,2018,38(10):15-20,26.［10］陈玉凤，谭飞，胡红玲，等．水淹胁迫对桢楠幼树生长及光合生理特性的影响［J］.生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(3):224-231．［11］常春丽,王展,王晶英.淹水胁迫对丁香幼苗形态及生理特性的影响［J］.北方园艺，2018(17):105-110.［12］陆日惠，徐力兴，周晓星，等.淹水胁迫对福建山樱花幼苗生长和光合特性的影响［J］.江西农业大学学报,2022,44(4):871-881.［13］刘兰.全球极端天气走向常态化［J］.生态经济,2021，37(9):5-8.［14］王晓明，陈明皋，潘会堂，等.紫薇新品种创制及栽培技术研究［M］.北京:中国林业出版社，2022.［15］刘东焕,赵世伟,樊金龙.不同紫薇品种的抗旱性研究［C］.广州：中国国艺学会观赏园艺专业委员会2012年学术年会,2012.［16］曾慧杰,王晓明,李永欣,等.两个紫薇品种引种栽培及逆境胁迫下脯氨酸含量分析［J］.北方园艺,2015(16):67-72.［17］王昊,吕春华,金倩,等.3个紫薇品种抗旱能力的比较研究［J］.北方农业学报,2018,46(2):103-106.［18］WANG Y,NI F,YIN D,et al.Physiological response of Lagerstroemia indica (L.) Pers.seedlings to drought and rewatering［J］.Tropical Plant Biology,2021,14(4):360-370.［19］廖浩斌,谭宗健,孙红梅,等.水淹胁迫对4个树种幼苗叶片生理特征的影响［J］.福建农业科技,2018(11):10-14.［20］路文静，李奕松.植物生理学实验教程［M］.2版.北京:中国林业出版社,2017.［21］LU H,WANG M,LI W,et al.Superior antioxidant capacity and auxin production promote seedling formation of rice seeds under submergence stress［J］.Agronomy,2023,13(1):171.［22］尹若汐,宋雨欣,丘建煌,等.水淹胁迫下桃金娘叶片生理及荧光特性研究［J］.中国野生植物资源,2022,41(6):12-17.［23］王哲宇，童丽丽，汤庚国.淹水胁迫对朴树幼苗形态及生理特性的影响［J］.林业科技开发,2013,27(4):44-47.［24］孙慧,吴中能,刘俊龙,等.淹水胁迫对4个杨树品种幼苗生长及生理特性的影响［J］.西部林业科学,2020,49(2):62-67.［25］杜习武,秦俊,叶康,等.淹水胁迫对星花玉兰及其品种光合特性的影响［J］.植物研究，2022,42(3):483-491.［26］LIAO F Y,XIE Y,JIAN G H.The effect of water stress on the physiology of Vinca major ‘Variegata’［J］.Applied Mechanics and Materials,2013,409/410:782-787.［27］FERNANDEZ M D.Changes in photosynthesis and fluorescence in response to flooding in emerged and submerged leaves of Pouteria orinocoensis ［J］.Photosynthetica,2006,44(1):32-38.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-08-23