|Table of Contents|

Research on Compressive Strength of Shajiang Black Soil Based on Response Surface Methodology

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年15
Page:
81-86
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Research on Compressive Strength of Shajiang Black Soil Based on Response Surface Methodology
Author(s):
WANG Beibei; YAN Zhengnan; SHI Yuliang; YANG Yanjie
(College of Horticulture，Qingdao Agricultural University，Qingdao，Shandong 266109)
Keywords:
shajiang black soil; compressive strength; response surface method; soil improvement
PACS:
S 155.2+7
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20234551
Abstract:
Taking shajiang black soil as the test material,the effect of peat，sand，and superphosphate as soil amendments on soil compressive strength was studied by response surface methodology,the relationship between soil compressive strength and soil physicochemical properties was analyzed,in order to provide reference for soil amelioration in the shajiang black soil area.The results showed that the primary and secondary order of the effect of amendments on reducing soil compressive strength was peat>sand>superphosphate，and the compressive strength was highly significantly positively correlated with the clay content and significantly positively correlated with the unit weight.There was a highly significant negative correlation with sand and the content of organic matter，and a significant negative correlation with porosity.According to the optimal solution provided by Design Expert 12，the addition of peat 77.72 g·kg-1，sand 61.91 g·kg-1，and superphosphate 2.63 g·kg-1 effectively improved the soil physical and chemical properties (bulk density,(1.24±0.03)g·cm-3;porosity,53.01%±2.36%;clay,24.8%±0.64%;silty sand,38.37%±1.22%;grit,36.83%±1.51%).In the end，the minimum compressive strength of the soil was 266.67 kPa，which was 53.62% lower than the compressive strength of the control treatment.There was a excellent effect on land preparation after effectively reducing the soil compressive.

References:

［1］花可可,王道中,郭志彬,等.施肥方式对砂姜黑土钾素利用及盈亏的影响［J］.土壤学报,2017,54(4):978-988.［2］宗玉统.砂姜黑土的物理障碍因子及其改良［D］.杭州:浙江大学,2013.［3］查理思,吴克宁,李玲,等.河南省砂姜黑土土属的耕作障碍因素研究［J］.土壤通报,2015,46(2):280-286.［4］陈桂斌,董超,张立,等.对辊挤压式砂姜黑土整地机设计与试验［J］.农业机械学报,2022,53(3):50-59.［5］ZHAI S,SHI Y,ZHOU J,et al.Simulation optimization and experimental study of the working performance of a vertical rotary tiller based on the discrete element method［J］.Actuators,2022,11(12):342.［6］黄昌勇.土壤学［M］.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.［7］付威,雍晨旭,马东豪,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区治沟造地土壤快速培肥效应［J］.农业工程学报,2019,35(21):252-261.［8］黄倩楠,张晓明,卫杰,等.掺砂对崩岗土壤无侧限抗压强度的影响［J］.北京林业大学学报,2020,42(1):114-120.［9］ZHANG C,LIU W,LI X,et al.Study on the influence of composite soil on the slope stability of farmland during in land consolidation［J］.Environmental Earth Sciences,2022,81(5):166.［10］马彦霞,王晓巍,张玉鑫,等.河西绿洲区菜田掺沙对土壤理化性状和甘蓝生长的影响［J］.核农学报,2017,31(11):2265-2272.［11］徐恩兵,路丁,韦雷.磷石膏和过磷酸钙对盐碱土的改良效果研究［C］//《环境工程》2018年全国学术年会论文集(中册).北京,2018.［12］李品月,张威明,陶俊,等.应用响应面法优化芍药花瓣多酚超声提取工艺［J］.北方园艺,2022(23):112-119.［13］杜森,高祥照.全国农业技术推广服务中心.土壤分析技术规范［M］.2版.北京:中国农业出版社,2006.［14］中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.土工试验方法标准:GB/T 50123-2019［S］.北京:中国计划出版社,2019.［15］王世斌,高佩玲,相龙康,等.生物炭、河沙对盐碱土水盐、氮素及玉米产量的影响［J］.灌溉排水学报,2021,40(9):17-23.［16］KHAN F S,AZAM S,RAGHUNANDAN M E,et al.Compressive strength of compacted clay-sand mixes［J］.Advances in Materials Science and Engineering,2014,2014:921815.［17］乔鈜元,盛月凡,王海燕,等.生石灰与过磷酸钙混施对连作土壤的改良效果及平邑甜茶幼苗生长的影响［J］.中国果树,2020(3):16-22.［18］RINGELBERG D B,COLE D M,FOLEY K L,et al.Compressive strength of soils amended with a bacterial succinoglycan:Effects of soluble salts and organic matter［J］.Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2014,51(7):747-757.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-08-23