|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Fertilizer Combinations on Soil Microbial Community Structure and Diversity in Cherry Orchards

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年16
Page:
65-72
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Fertilizer Combinations on Soil Microbial Community Structure and Diversity in Cherry Orchards
Author(s):
ZHANG Yusheng1; ZHANG Fan1; GUO Shoujun2; GUO Zhigang3; CHEN Baihong1; MA Zonghuan1
(1.College of Horticulture,Gansu Agricultural University,Lanzhou,Gansu 730070;2.Tiaoshan Agricultural and Commercial Development Branch,Gansu Yasheng Industrial (Group) Co.Ltd.,Baiyin,Gansu 730400;3.Gansu Province Big Cherry Technology Innovation Center,Tianshui,Gansu 741000)
Keywords:
cherry; fertilizer ratio; soilmicroorganisms; community diversity
PACS:
S 662.5
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20234522
Abstract:
Taking one-year-old ‘Meizao’ cherry as the test material,different fertilizer combinations were used,with a total of 12 treatments included no fertilization (CK),conventional fertilization (N,P,K basic fertilizer (CK1)) and composite treatment (conventional fertilization+(T1-T10)).The effects of each fertilization treatment on the soil microbial community structure and diversity of cherry orchards were studied,in order to explore scientific and reasonable fertilization techniques for cherry production management and provide reference for cherry cultivation.The results showed that,compared with CK,T2,T7,T8,T9,and T10 treatments could improve bacterial diversity and richness in soil.Among them,T9 (conventional fertilization+saline alkali soil amendment+microbial fertilizer+amino acid water-soluble fertilizer) treatment was the most significant,with Shannon,Chaol,and ACE indices increased by 5.53%,15.58%,and 15.69% respectively compared to CK.In terms of community structure,the relative abundance of Chloroflexi,Firmicutes,and Acidobacteriota treated with T9 increased by 11.00%,10.90%,and 3.39%,respectively,compared to CK.In addition,T9 treatment showed the most significant improvement in fungal diversity and richness in soil,with Shannon,Chaol,and ACE indices increased by 51.02%,22.28%,and 20.94%,respectively,compared to CK.In terms of community structure,the relative abundance of Ascomycota and Mortierellomycota treated with T9 increased by 13.12% and 7.68%,respectively,compared to CK.

References:

［1］朱桃川，明玉飞，李传福，等．增施有机肥对黄河三角洲盐碱地碳氮组分和微生物群落的影响［J］．水土保持学报，2022，36(6)：387-393.［2］吴迪，魏成熙．施肥对酒用高粱根际与非根际土壤酶活性的影响［J］．贵州农业科学，2011，39(3)：116-118.［3］文景芝，李刚，张齐凤，等．施肥对大棚黄瓜根际微生物群落结构和数量消长的影响［J］．中国蔬菜，2007(12)：11-14.［4］SARATHCHANDRA S U,GHANI A,YEATES G W,et al.Effect of nitrogen and phosphate fertilisers on microbial and nematode diversity in pasture soils［J］.Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2001,33(7/8):964.［5］ALLISON S D，MARTINY J B H．Resistance，resilience，and redundancy in microbial communities［J］．Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America，2008，105(S1)：11512-11519.［6］GEISSELER D，SCOW K M．Long-term effects of mineral fertilizers on soil microorganisms:A review［J］．Soil Biology and Biochemistry，2014，75：54-63.［7］汪学美．谈土壤肥料对农业生产的影响［J］．农业开发与装备，2017(4)：107.［8］王秀英．重庆地区柑橘园土壤养分现状及优化施肥研究［D］．重庆：西南大学，2011.［9］AMATO K R，YEOMAN C J，KENT A，et al．Habitat degradation impacts black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra) gastrointestinal microbiomes［J］．The ISME Journal，2013，7(7)：1344-1353.［10］陈丹梅，袁玲，黄建国，等．长期施肥对南方典型水稻土养分含量及真菌群落的影响［J］．作物学报，2017，43(2)：286-295.［11］张贵云，吕贝贝，张丽萍，等．黄土高原旱地麦田26年免耕覆盖对土壤肥力及原核微生物群落多样性的影响［J］．中国生态农业学报(中英文)，2019，27(3)：358-368.［12］LI X，HE H，ZHANG X，et al．Distinct responses of soil fungal and bacterial nitrate immobilization to land conversion from forest to agriculture［J］．Soil Biology and Biochemistry，2019，134：81-89.［13］HAMM A C，TENUTA M，KRAUSE D O，et al．Bacterial communities of an agricultural soil amended with solid pig and dairy manures，and urea fertilizer［J］．Applied Soil Ecology，2016，103：61-71.［14］HOLLISTER E B，SCHADT C W，PALUMBO A V，et al．Structural and functional diversity of soil bacterial and fungal communities following woody plant encroachment in the southern Great Plains［J］．Soil Biology and Biochemistry，2010，42(10)：1816-1824.［15］桑文，赵亚光，张凤华．化肥减量配施有机液体肥对土壤微生物群落结构多样性的影响［J］．西南农业学报，2020，33(11)：2584-2590.［16］SUN H Y，DENG S P，RAUN W R．Bacterial community structure and diversity in a century-old manure-treated agroecosystem［J］．Applied and Environmental Microbiology，2004，70(10)：5868-5874.［17］王小玲，马琨，伏云珍，等．冬小麦免耕覆盖与生物有机肥施用对土壤细菌群落的影响［J］．生态学报，2020，40(19)：7030-7043.［18］高玉峰，贺字典．影响土壤真菌多样性的土壤因素［J］．中国农学通报，2010，26(10)：177-181.［19］张静，可文静，刘娟，等．不同深度土壤控水对稻田土壤微生物区系及细菌群落多样性的影响［J］．中国生态农业学报(中英文)，2019，27(2)：277-285.［20］陈祖静，高尚坤，陈园，等．短期施肥对桉树人工林土壤真菌群落结构及功能类群的影响［J］．生态学报，2020，40(11)：3813-3821.［21］DEDYSH S N，RICKE P，LIESACK W．NifH and NifD phylogenies：An evolutionary basis for understanding nitrogen fixation capabilities of methanotrophic bacteria［J］．Microbiology，2004，150(Pt 5)：1301-1313.［22］KEASLING J D．Synthetic biology：A global approach［J］．Nature，2014，510：218.［23］KOPECKY J，KYSELKOVA M，OMELKA M，et al．Actinobacterial community dominated by a distinct clade in acidic soil of a waterlogged deciduous forest［J］．FEMS Microbiology Ecology，2011，78(2)：386-394.［24］KLATT C G，LIU Z，LUDWIG M，et al．Temporal metatranscriptomic patterning in phototrophic Chloroflexi inhabiting a microbial mat in a geothermal spring［J］．The ISME Journal，2013，7(9)：1775-1789.［25］SHEN Z，WANG D，RUAN Y，et al．Deep 16S rRNA pyrosequencing reveals a bacterial community associated with Banana Fusarium Wilt disease suppression induced by bio-organic fertilizer application［J］．PLoS One，2014，9(5)：e98420.［26］杨敏，曹敬东，郑元仙，等．生物有机肥对热区烤烟根际土壤酚酸类物质和细菌群落结构的影响［J］．江苏农业科学，2020，48(24)：244-251.［27］陈志豪，梁雪，李永春，等．不同施肥模式对雷竹林土壤真菌群落特征的影响［J］．应用生态学报，2017，28(4)：1168-1176.［28］陈丹梅，段玉琪，杨宇虹，等．长期施肥对植烟土壤养分及微生物群落结构的影响［J］．中国农业科学，2014，47(17)：3424-3433.［29］丁宁，彭玲，安欣，等．不同时期施氮矮化苹果对15N的吸收、分配及利用［J］．植物营养与肥料学报，2016，22(2)：572-578.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-09-04