|Table of Contents|

Biomass Allocation and Soil Microbial Response to Drought Stress in Calamagrostis acutiflora

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年11
Page:
79-87
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Biomass Allocation and Soil Microbial Response to Drought Stress in Calamagrostis acutiflora
Author(s):
LIU Wei1FENG Kang′an1ZHU Baocai2
(1.Department of Forestry,Shanxi Forestry Vocational Technical College,Taiyuan,Shanxi 030009;2.College of Forestry,Shanxi Agricultural University,Taiyuan,Shanxi 030031)
Keywords:
Calamagrostis acutifloradrought stressbiomassmicroorganism
PACS:
S 688.4
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20234156
Abstract:
Taking Calamagrostis acutiflora as the test material and using potted water control method,the effects of different degrees of drought stress on biomass allocation and soil microorganisms of Calamagrostis acutiflora were studied,in order to provide reference for the cultivation and planting of Calamagrostis acutiflora in arid areas.The results showed that the aboveground and underground biomass increased first and then decreased with increasing drought stress,peaking at mild and severe levels,respectively.The root-crown ratio and the proportion of fine root biomass steadily increased with increasing drought stress,while the percentage of coarse root biomass decreased.High-throughput sequencing findings indicated that there was minimal impact on soil microbial diversity due to drought stress,but there was a greater impact on microbial community composition.Since the comparisons of fine root biomass and root-crown ratio provided insights into plant water absorption and resilience to stress,we proposed that several microorganisms,such as WS3,SAR406,Proteobacteria,and GN04 in bacteria,and Oomycota and Glomeromycota in fungi,were crucial in resistance to drought strain of Calamagrostis acutiflora.

References:

[1]韩喆,张永强,张浩浩,等.干旱胁迫对伊犁绢蒿幼苗生长及叶片解剖结构的影响[J].草地学报,2024,32(1):105-112.[2]史加勉,宋鸽,刘珊珊,等.杉木林土壤丛枝菌根真菌形态特征及孢子相关细菌多样性对模拟氮沉降和干旱的响应[J].应用生态学报,2023,34(12):3291-3300.[3]李秀玲,刘开强,刘君,等.干旱胁迫对六种观赏草枯叶率及生理指标的影响[J].中国草地学报,2012,34(4):93-100.[4]王田野,王平,吴泽宁,等.干旱胁迫下植被生态韧性研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2023,38(8):790-801.[5]段丽丽,刘仁祥.干旱胁迫对烟草幼苗生理特性的影响[J].贵州大学学报(自然科学版),2023,40(4):34-38.[6]GRISAFI F,ODDO E,GARGANO M L,et al.Tamarix arborea var.arborea and Tamarix parviflora:Two species valued for their adaptability to stress conditions[J].Acta Biologica Hungarica,2016,67(1):42-52.[7]杨小英,王利凯,马小梅,等.干旱胁迫对八仙花生理特性及叶片结构的影响[J].北方园艺,2023(11):75-80.[8]L X P,GAO H J,ZHANG L,et al.Dynamic responses of Haloxylon ammodendron to various degrees of simulated drought stress[J].Plant Physiology and Biochemistry:PPB,2019,139:121-131.[9]李江,靳艳玲,赵海.根际促生菌对植物生长的影响及其作用机制[J].黑龙江农业科学,2023(10):132-137.[10]任伟,高慧娟,王润娟,等.高等植物适应干旱生境研究进展[J].草学,2020(3):4-15.[11]郑天骄,王梦姣.不同蓝莓根际微生物群落结构多样性及其差异[J].北方园艺,2022(14):76-86.[12]马爱媛,任轶,汪姣,等.提高水稻耐盐能力的根际核心菌株筛选及应用[J/OL].土壤学报,(2023-08-25)[2024-02-21].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1119.P.20230824.1137.002.html.[13]谢丰璞,王楠,高静,等.干旱胁迫下药用大黄根部药效成分及根际土壤微生物变化规律及其相互作用机制研究[J].中国中药杂志,2023,48(6):1498-1509.[14]南瑾如.营造自然式种植时观赏草的优势与应用方式[J].现代园艺,2022,45(20):130-132.[15]张全刚,孙建华,尤媛媛,等.浅谈观赏草在园林景观中的应用[J].国土绿化,2022(11):70-72.[16]冷家明,尚天翠,毛锦龙,等.不同盐胁迫对假苇拂子茅种子萌发与幼苗生长的影响[J].草地学报,2017,25(5):1152-1155.[17]李少然,王冕之,宋硕,等.银川市5种典型城市树木蒸腾耗水特性及其受主要气象驱动力的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2022,50(9):35-39.[18]马靖涵,穆艳,张瑞,等.城市园林银杏液流变化特征及其主要影响因子[J].西北林学院学报,2022,37(5):72-79.[19]宇万太,于永强.植物地下生物量研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(6):927-932.[20]谢志玉,张文辉.干旱和复水对文冠果生长及生理生态特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(6):1759-1767.[21]杨丹,张舒芸,田新会,等.不同黑麦品种(品系)对持续干旱胁迫的形态适应性研究[J].草地学报,2020,28(1):122-129.[22]王悦,高山,程凯乐,等.干旱胁迫对不同品种饲料油菜生长发育、干物质积累及产量的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2023,51(10):155-163.[23]龙思宇,李萌,邓亚婷,等.ALA对干旱胁迫下绣球生理特性的影响[J].北方园艺,2022(10):63-69.[24]邢强,秦俊,胡永红.城市垂直绿墙常用植物的根系构型特征和生长动态[J].生态学报,2023,43(6):2515-2523.[25]孙浩月.盐胁迫对普通菜豆(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)萌发期生长的影响及其耐盐性分子机制[D].大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学,2021.[26]龚记熠,彭毅秋,张冬林,等.干旱胁迫对引种辣椒生长特性的影响[J].广东农业科学,2014,41(2):54-56,69.[27]YANG Y,DOU Y,AN S,et al.Abiotic and biotic factors modulate plant biomass and root/shoot (R/S) ratios in grassland on the Loess Plateau,China[J].The Science of the Total Environment,2018,636:621-631.[28]刘长利,王文,崔俊茹,等.干旱胁迫对甘草光合特性与生物量分配的影响[J].中国沙漠,2006,26(1):142-145.[29]张瀚曰,包维楷,胡斌,等.植被类型变化对土壤微生物碳利用效率的影响研究进展[J].生态学报,2023,43(16):6878-6888.[30]李金子月,侯瑞.深色有隔内生真菌和木霉应对植物干旱胁迫的研究进展[J/OL].分子植物育种,(2023-11-29)[2024-02-21].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20231128.1133.006.html.[31]刘元玺,吴俊文,王丽娜,等.云南松幼苗生长及生理生化特性对持续干旱胁迫的响应[J/OL].分子植物育种,(2024-02-02)[2024-03-25].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20230518.1319.004.html.[32]安玉艳,梁宗锁,郝文芳.杠柳幼苗对不同强度干旱胁迫的生长与生理响应[J].生态学报,2011,31(3):716-725.[33]杨志新,郑旭,陈来宝,等.干旱区盐碱地食叶草根系形态分布适应策略研究[J].草业学报,2022,31(7):15-27.[34]BANKS M K,CLENNAN C,DODDS W,et al.Variations in microbial activity due to fluctuations in soil water content at the water table interface[J].Journal of Environmental Science and Health,Part A,1999,34(3):479-505.[35]GOMEZ E J,DELGADO J A,GONZALEZ J M.Environmental factors affect the response of microbial extracellular enzyme activity in soils when determined as a function of water availability and temperature[J].Ecology and Evolution,2020,10(18):10105-10115.[36]王小平,肖肖,唐天文,等.连香树人工林根系分泌物输入季节性变化及其驱动的根际微生物特性研究[J].植物研究,2018,38(1):47-55.[37]王灿,赵文麟,张新梅,等.根际细菌群落结构对黄瓜幼苗干旱胁迫的响应[J/OL].西南农业学报,(2023-11-24)[2024-02-21].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1213.s.20231123.1100.032.html.[38]王香生,连延浩,郭辉,等.小麦红花间作系统根际微生物群落结构及功能分析[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2023,31(4):516-529.[39]唐杰,陈知青,郭安南,等.不同作物根际土壤微生物的群落结构特征分析[J].核农学报,2021,35(12):2830-2840.[40]徐扬,张冠初,丁红,等.花生根际土壤细菌群落对干旱和盐胁迫的响应[J].中国油料作物学报,2020,42(6):985-993.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-06-27