|Table of Contents|

Optimization of Rooting and Transplanting System of Diospyros lotus L.Tissue Cultured Seedlings

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年3
Page:
33-40
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Optimization of Rooting and Transplanting System of Diospyros lotus L.Tissue Cultured Seedlings
Author(s):
LYU Zhongyi1LIU Qinghua2FAN Zhirui1SHEN Xiaoxia1GUAN Changfei1YANG Yong1
(1.College of Horticulture,Northwest A&F University,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100;2.Xintai Modern Agriculture Development Service Center,Tai′an,Shandong 271214)
Keywords:
Diospyros lotus L.tissue cultured seedlingsrootingtransplanting
PACS:
S 665.3
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20233278
Abstract:
Taking Diospyros lotus L.tissue cultured seedlings as test material,the effects of the different plant growth regulator treatment on the tissue cultured seedlings root were studied,and the different moisturizing time after transplanting the influence of tissue seedlings transplanting survival rate were explored,in order to obtain Diospyros lotus L.tissue seedlings root transplanting efficient technology system and provide reference for the clonal propagation of persimmon rootstocks.The results showed that,the group culture seedling had the best rooting effect at 1.0 mg·L-1 IBA+0.5 mg·L-1 IAA treatment.The rooting rate could reach 95.56%,the average number of root bars was 7.93,the average fresh weight was 0.59 g,root system vitality of 0.99 μg·g-1·h-1,the average total root length was 26.57 cm,the average root surface area was 10.33 cm2,the average root volume was 0.32 cm3,the average root diameter could reach 0.61 mm.The highest survival rate of 10 days moisturizing culture after transplanting was 90.44%.The average plant height was 64.32 cm at 5 months after transplanting to the field,stem thick,6.86 mm,could be used for the grafting and propagation of the scions.

References:

[1]YAMAGISHI M,MATSUMOTO S,NAKATSUKA A,et al.Identification of persimmon (Diospyros kaki) cultivars and phenetic relationships between Diospyros species by more effective RAPD analysis[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2005,105(2):283-290.[2]曹坤,韩卫娟,傅建敏,等.无核君迁子果实发育过程中品质变化规律研究[J].西北林学院学报,2021,36(4):124-130.[3]李晶,罗玉洁,张青林,等.君迁子休眠芽及叶片离体培养体系优化及植株再生[J].华中农业大学学报,2016,35(4):14-19.[4]杨婷婷,于泽群,夏乐晗,等.君迁子(Diospyroslotus)种质资源形态学性状的聚类分析[J].果树学报,2014,31(4):566-573.[5]周瑞金,张晓娜,扈惠灵,等.无核君迁子离体叶片的植株再生[J].北方园艺,2016(22):104-106.[6]李畅.阳丰甜柿组织培养及微型嫁接技术研究[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2016.[7]LI X H,JIANG Z Y,SHEN Y Y,et al.In vitro regeneration and Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of D.lotus ( Diospyros lotus L.)[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2018,236(6):229-237.[8]SARATHCHANDRA S U,BURCH G.Micropropagation of Japanese persimmon (Diospyros kaki Thun.) cv.‘Hiratanenashi’[J].New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science,1991,19(2):113-120.[9]朱陈宇.柿砧木L938组培技术研究[D].保定:河北农业大学,2020.[10]周艳芳.君迁子无融合生殖的种质鉴定及胚培养体系的建立[D].新乡:河南科技学院,2022.[11]谷会涛.磨盘柿离体再生体系的建立与遗传转化的初步探索[D].保定:河北农业大学,2006.[12]谢启鑫,黄美连,吴晓萍,等.君迁子叶片培养再生植株的研究[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(2):607-612.[13]吕中一,关长飞,李家艳,等.柿属植物组织培养技术研究进展[J].北方园艺,2023(12):129-137.[14]刘彬,杜晓云,陈文兴,等.广亲和砧木小果甜柿离体快繁技术建立及优化[J].果树学报,2023,40(9):1980-1991.[15]刘洋.君迁子组织培养再生体系的建立及遗传转化研究[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2022.[16]黄烈健,王鸿.林木植物组织培养及存在问题的研究进展[J].林业科学研究,2016,29(3):464-471.[17]ZHANG X,LIU J R,JIA W J,et al.Thymol modulates in vitro plant regeneration and gene expression in sesame[J].In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant,2022,58(2):240-255.[18]AGHAYEH R N M,ABEDY B,BALANDARI A,et al.The first successful report:Control of browning problem in vitro culture of Iranian seedless barberry,a Medicinally important species[J].Erwerbs-Obstbau,2021,63(3):319-329.[19]宋春丽,马俊莲,刘月英,等.取材时期和BA浓度对磨盘柿初代组培建立的影响[J].河北林果研究,2007(3):309-313.[20]蒋振莹.君迁子组培快繁及叶片再生体系研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2015.[21]姬惜珠,张爱军,王红,等.不同调节剂处理对柿树试管苗增殖与生根的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2005(4):35-37.[22]蒋振莹,闫艳秋,林志伟,等.山红柿组培快繁技术体系的建立[J].江西农业大学学报,2016,38(1):74-82.[23]杨丽琴,李瑞,王俊,等.植物组织培养的三大难题[J].北方园艺,2008(4):104-107.[24]申晓鸿.次郎柿ACC合成酶转基因及生根移栽体系的研究[D].保定:河北农业大学,2007.[25]刘晓娜,马俊莲.上西早生柿试管苗根段植株再生试验[J].中国果树,2004(4):24-26.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-03-01