|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Returning Methods of Tomato Straw on Seedling Growth of Cucumber and Watermelon

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年23
Page:
53-59
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Returning Methods of Tomato Straw on Seedling Growth of Cucumber and Watermelon
Author(s):
YANG Dongyan; SANG Ting; WANG Dan; FENG Haiping; ZHAO Yunxia
(Horticultural Research Institute，Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences，Yinchuan，Ningxia 750002)
Keywords:
tomato straw returning; seedling growth; allelopathic
PACS:
S 642.2;S 651
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20232277
Abstract:
Taking tomato straw as test materials，the effects of different returning methods of tomato straw (fresh straw crushed，sun-dried and composted) on the growth of cucumber and watermelon seedlings and their allelopathy were studied in pot culture,in order to provide reference the way of fertilizer utilization of tomato straw.The results showed that within 30 days of returning tomato straw to the field，composting treatment promoted the growth of cucumber and watermelon seedlings，significantly increased the accumulation of root biomass.The fresh and dry straw returning treatments had allelopathic inhibition on the growth of cucumber and watermelon seedlings，and the fresh straw returning treatment had stronger inhibition effect，especially on the accumulation of root biomass.The inhibition effect of cucumber seedlings was stronger than that of watermelon seedlings within 30 days of returning to the field，and the inhibition effect was strengthened with the extension of returning time.The inhibition effect of watermelon seedlings was weakened after 20 days of returning.Therefore，in production，tomato straw compost should be preferentially returned to the field，and directly returned to the field (fresh sample or dry straw).It was recommended to have a decomposition period of more than 30 days before planting melons and vegetable crops.

References:

［1］GUSTAVSSON J，CEDERBERG C，SONESSON U，et al.Global food losses and food waste：Extent，causes and prevention［M］.Rome:FAO，2011.［2］国家统计局农村社会经济调查司.中国农村统计年鉴2020［M］.北京：中国统计出版社，2020.［3］薛颖昊,徐志宇,张明明,等.我国蔬菜秸秆无害化处理技术优化探讨［J］.中国农业资源与区划,2021，42(10):75-83.［4］ALVAREZ R，LIDN G.Semi-continuous co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste，manure，and fruit and vegetable waste［J］.Renewable Energy,2008，33(4)：726-734．［5］DAS A，MONDAL C.Studies on the utilization of fruit and vegetable waste for generation of biogas［J］.International Journal of Engineering Science,2013，3(9)：24-32．［6］李扬，李彦明.蔬菜废弃物的堆肥化处理技术研究进展［J］.北方园艺，2015(19)：180-184.［7］陈慈,赵姜,龚晶.蔬菜废弃物资源化利用的技术路径与建议［J］.北方园艺,2021(6):156-161［8］孙宁，王飞，孙仁华，等.国外农作物秸秆主要利用方式与经验借鉴［J］.中国人口资源与环境，2016，26（S1）：469-474.［9］杜鹏祥,韩雪,高杰云,等.我国蔬菜废弃物资源化高效利用潜力分析［J］.中国蔬菜，2015（7）：15-20［10］宋玉晶，柴立平.我国蔬菜废弃物综合利用模式分析：以寿光为例［J］.中国蔬菜，2018（1）：12-17.［11］魏晓璇.日光温室黄瓜／番茄残株原位还田技术的科学性评估［D］.北京：中国农业科学院，2021.［12］刘建国,卞新民,李彦斌,等.长期连作和秸秆还田对棉田土壤生物活性的影响［J］.应用生态学报，2008，19（5）：1027-1032.［13］杨冬艳,冯海萍,桑婷,等.番茄秸秆不同还田方式对番茄生长及土壤碳氮含量和酶活性的影响［J］.中国蔬菜,2018(10):55-59.［14］杨冬艳，桑婷，冯海萍，等.番茄与辣椒秸秆不同还田方式对茄果类蔬菜幼苗生长的影响［J］.福建农业学报，2020，35（3）：273-279.［15］杨冬艳,桑婷,冯海萍,等.番茄和辣椒秸秆还田对自身蔬菜幼苗生长及根系酶活性的影响［J］.上海农业学报,2020,36(5)：23-28 ［16］毕于运,王亚静,高春雨.中国主要秸秆资源数量及其区域分布［J］.农机化研究,2010，32(3):1-7.［17］宋晓,陈莉,李建芬.蔬菜秸秆废弃物资源化利用模式研究［J］.安徽农业科学,2019,47(21):89-91.［18］孙小妹,俞兆鹏,吕文军,等.番茄秸秆原位还田配施腐解菌剂对番茄生产的影响［J］.干旱地区农业研究,2022,40(3):136-143.［19］李潇雅.不同蔬菜秸秆还田对黄瓜连作土壤特性及植株生长的响［D］.泰安:山东农业大学，2021.［20］吴凤芝,赵凤艳,刘元英.设施蔬菜连作障碍原因综合分析与防治措施［J］.东北农业大学学报，2000,31(3)：241-247.［21］杨思存，霍琳，王建成．秸秆还田的生化他感效应研究初报［J］．西北农业学报，2005，14(1)：52-56.［22］WAKJIRA M，BERECHA G，TULU S.Allelopathic effects of an invasive alien weed Parthenium hysterophorus L.compost on lettuce germination and growth［J］.African Journal of Agricultural Research，2009，4(11)：1325-1330.［23］LI P，CHANG Q，WANG C,et al.Composting of aerial parts of crofton weed (Eupatorium adenophorum Spreng)，the top invasive plant in Southwest China［J］.Compost Science & Utilization，2014,22(3)：132-137.［24］ZHOU Y，ZHOU Q B，GAN S W，et al.Factors affecting farmers′ willingness to pay for adopting vegetable residue compost in North China［J］.Acta Ecologica Sinica，2018,38(6):401-411.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-12-20