|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Soil Amendments on the Soil Enzyme Activities in the Replanted Orchard and No Replanted Orchard

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年1
Page:
76-84
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Soil Amendments on the Soil Enzyme Activities in the Replanted Orchard and No Replanted Orchard
Author(s):
DU KangwuLU XingrongHE JunqiangDOU XinLI XiaoXU Hong
(Gansu Construction Investment Ecological Construction Group Co.Ltd.,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000)
Keywords:
soil conditionerbio-fertilizersoil enzymesoil pHsoil EC value
PACS:
S 156.2
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20232044
Abstract:
Taking apples as the test material,four amendments measures were adopted,control (CK),only application of the bio-fertilizer (F),only application of the soil conditioner (M),and combined application of the bio-fertilizer and soil conditioner (FM) to improve the soil EC value,pH,and enzyme activity in the 0-20,20-40 cm and 40-60 cm soil layers of replanted orchard and no replanted orchard,in order to provide reference for the transplantation of new apple tree seedlings and the improvement of soil quality in the replanted orchard and no replanted orchard.The results showed that F treatment significantly decreased the soil pH in the no replanted orchard,M treatment significantly increased the soil pH of 0-20 cm soil layer in the replanted orchard to 8.25.Soil EC value and pH showed opposite trend.M treatment significantly increased soil catalase activity by 32.53%;the activities of Suc,Ure,and ALP in all soil layers were significantly increased by 78.23%-167.11%,13.79%-20.68%,and 99.53%-156.33% in F treatment,and increased by 14.76%-84.40%,9.31%-40.35%,19.45%-158.43% in M treatment in the no replanted orchard,respectively.The soil Suc,Ure,and ALP were significantly negatively correlated with soil pH and positively correlated with EC value in both replanted and no replanted orchards.In this study,it was suggested that the application of 1 500 kg·hm-2 soil conditioner in the replanted orchard and 1 500 kg·hm-2 bio-fertilizer in the no replanted orchard,which had better soil improvement effects,and the mixed application of soil conditioner and bio-fertilizer was not recommended in this area.

References:

[1]郭珊珊.苹果用地适宜性评价:以甘肃为例[J].现代农业研究,2020,26(2):44-45.[2]谢洪刚,李坤.果树连作障碍机理及控制途径[J].辽宁农业职业技术学院学报,2008,10(4):6-8.[3]范琳娟,刘奇志,王合,等.玉米-苹果轮作体系对苹果根际土壤酶活性和pH值的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2017,29(12):2084-2090.[4]张立恒,杨凤英,马海峰,等.果树连作障碍研究进展[J].落叶果树,2019,51(3):28-31.[5]马宝焜,徐继忠,孙建设.关于我国苹果矮砧密植栽培的思考[J].果树学报,2010,27(1):105-109.[6]张立恒.大连地区矮化密植苹果示范园建园技术[J].落叶果树,2021,53(5):79-81.[7]王建霞.河西地区果园土壤改良措施分析[J].甘肃科技,2020,36(11):154-156.[8]王光飞,高晓东,马艳,等.生物有机类复合调理剂在设施叶菜障碍土壤上的应用效果[J].中国土壤与肥料,2020(2):56-65.[9]管冠,何天养,姚锋先,等.土壤改良剂对赣南果园土壤磷及微生物的影响[J].赣南师范大学学报,2016,37(6):88-91.[10]解开治,徐培智,严超,等.不同土壤改良剂对南方酸性土壤的改良效果研究[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(20):160-165.[11]邓霏,呼丽萍,邹亚丽,等.EM和木美土里2种生物菌肥对苹果园土壤肥力的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2020,48(4):146-149.[12]张蕾,吴文强,王维瑞,等.土壤调理剂及其配施微生物菌肥对设施菜田次生盐渍化土壤改良效果研究[J].中国土壤与肥料,2021(3):264-271.[13]卢培娜,刘景辉,赵宝平,等.菌肥与腐熟秸秆对盐碱地土壤盐分及燕麦品质的影响[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(6):1639-1649.[14]张秀志.不同施肥处理下‘蜜脆’苹果叶片营养与果实品质及土壤肥力的分析[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021.[15]DICK R P,RASMUSSEN P E,KERLE E A.Influence of long-term residue management on soil enzyme activities in relation to soil chemical properties of a wheat-fallow system[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,1988,6(2):159-164.[16]CRECCHIO C,CURCI M,MININNI R,et al.Short-term effects of municipal solid waste compost amendments on soil carbon and nitrogen content,some enzyme activities and genetic diversity[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2001,34(5):311-318.[17]DICK R P.A review:Long-term effects of agricultural systems on soil biochemical and microbial parameters[J].Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment,1992,40(1/2/3/4):25-36.[18]ACOSTA-MARTINEZ V,MOORE-KUCERA J,COTTON J,et al.Soil enzyme activities during the 2011 Texas record drought/heat wave and implications to biogeochemical cycling and organic matter dynamics[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2014,75:43-51.[19]BADIANE N N Y,CHOTTE J L,PATE E,et al.Use of soil enzyme activities to monitor soil quality in natural and improved fallows in semi-arid tropical regions[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2001,18(3):229-238.[20]STAUNTON S,RAZZOUK R,ABADIE J,et al.Water-extractable soil organic matter inhibits phosphatase activity[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2012,55:14-16.[21]库永丽,徐国益,赵骅,等.腐植酸复合微生物肥料对高龄猕猴桃果园土壤改良及果实品质的影响[J].华北农学报,2018,33(3):167-175.[22]索琳娜,马杰,刘宝存,等.土壤调理剂应用现状及施用风险研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2021,40(6):1141-1149.[23]闫淑杰.现代果园土壤改良有效措施[J].新农业,2019(17):59-60.[24]DAS SHONKOR K,VARMA A.Role of enzymes in maintaining soil health,in soil enzymology[M].Berlin:Heidelberg,2010.[25]路文涛,贾志宽,张鹏,等.秸秆还田对宁南旱作农田土壤活性有机碳及酶活性的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2011,30(3):522-528.[26]冯世鑫,蒋妮,陈乾平,等.微生物菌肥对罗汉果根结线虫和土壤酶活性的影响[J].热带农业科学,2021,41(4):73-78.[27]陈荣枢,王汝儒,孙佳豪,等.漓江流域海拔、土壤及植被对土壤养分和酶化学计量比的影响[J].广西植物,2023,43(2):242-252.[28]崔嵘,邹莉,于洋,等.小兴安岭红松林土壤酶活性与土壤理化性质的时空变化[J].东北林业大学学报,2016,44(8):49-54.[29]荆瑞勇,曹焜,刘俊杰,等.东北农田黑土土壤酶活性与理化性质的关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(4):132-137,142.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-01-22