|Table of Contents|

Spatial-temporal Evolution Characteristics of Carbon Sink in Farmland Soil Ecosystem in Shaanxi Province

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年3
Page:
63-70
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Spatial-temporal Evolution Characteristics of Carbon Sink in Farmland Soil Ecosystem in Shaanxi Province
Author(s):
LI Yan′eWANG HuaqiMA Hongna
(Xi′an Center,China Geological Survey/Northwest China Center for Geoscience Innovation,Xi′an,Shaanxi 710054)
Keywords:
farmland soil ecosystemsoil carbon sinkcarbon sink intensityspatial-temporal evolution
PACS:
S 154.1
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20231506
Abstract:
Based on the estimation of carbon sink of farmland soil ecosystem in Shaanxi Province from 2005 to 2020,used the methods of standard deviation ellipse,spatial autocorrelation,cold and hot spot analysis to study the spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of its carbon sink,in order to reveal the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of soil carbon sink and reasonably formulate regional appropriate farmland management policies.The results showed that,1) From 2005 to 2020,the total amount of soil carbon sink in Shaanxi farmland showed a fluctuating upward trend,from 58.83×104 t per one year to 76.51×104 t per one year.The type of carbon sink was mainly fertilizer carbon sink.2) The spatial distribution pattern was ‘high in the middle and low in the north and south’.High-value areas were mainly distributed in Xianyang,Weinan,Xi′an and Baoji,while low-value areas were distributed in Yulin,Ankang and Shangluo.3) The center of gravity of the spatial distribution had the trend of moving to the north and slightly to the east,and the distribution scope had the trend of contracting first and then expanding.The influence of the northwest region on the overall spatial pattern of carbon sinks had been strengthened.The intensity of soil carbon sink had a positive spatial correlation,and the spatial distribution and concentration of cold and hot spots showed a fluctuating and stable feature.

References:

[1]朴世龙,张新平,陈安平,等.极端气候事件对陆地生态系统碳循环的影响[J].中国科学:地球科学,2019,49(9):1321-1334.[2]赵明月,刘源鑫,张雪艳.农田生态系统碳汇研究进展[J].生态学报,2022,42(23):9405-9416.[3]金琳,李玉娥,高清竹,等.中国农田管理土壤碳汇估算[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(3):734-743.[4]杨果,陈瑶.中国农业源碳汇估算及其与农业经济发展的耦合分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(12):171-176.[5]谭美秋,崔耀平,马晓哲,等.河南省农田生态系统碳汇核算研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2022,38(9):1129-1137.[6]韩冰,王效科,逯非,等.中国农田土壤生态系统固碳现状和潜力[J].生态学报,2008,28(2):612-619.[7]梁二,蔡典雄,张丁辰,等.中国陆地土壤有机碳储量估算及其不确定性分析[J].中国土壤与肥料,2010(6):75-79.[8]薛彩霞,李园园,胡超,等.中国保护性耕作净碳汇的时空格局[J].自然资源学报,2022,37(5):1164-1182.[9]罗玉叶,邱龙霞,龙军,等.不同秸秆还田率情境下亚热带水田土壤的“碳汇”贡献模拟研究[J/OL].土壤学报,(2023-05-05)[2022-09-19].https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1119.p.20220916.1340.002.html.[10]张昊,樊文华,田剑,等.不同改良剂施用量和次数对黄土区煤矿复垦土壤团聚体和有机碳含量的影响[J/OL].应用与环境生物学报,2023,29(4):987-993.[11]孟婷婷,杨亮彦,孔辉,等.生物有机肥施用量对土壤有机碳组分及酶活性的影响[J].北方园艺,2022(17):86-91.[12]马子钰,马文林.施肥对中国农田土壤固碳影响效应研究[J].土壤,2022,54(5):905-911.[13]朱长伟,陈琛,牛润芝,等.不同轮耕模式对豫北农田土壤固碳及碳库管理指数的影响[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2022,30(4):671-682.[14]高崇升,杨国亭,王建国,等.利用Century模型模拟不同农业经营模式下黑土农田土壤有机碳的演变[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(6):911-915.[15]张国,逯非,赵红,等.我国农作物秸秆资源化利用现状及农户对秸秆还田的认知态度[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(5):981-988.[16]赵璐,赵作权.基于特征椭圆的中国经济空间分异研究[J].地理科学,2014,34(8):979-986.[17]王英,杨娟,王佳丽.农田生态系统碳排放时空格局及趋势分析[J].中国农业大学学报,2023,28(1):89-101.[18]李玉玲,李世平,祁静静.陕西省土地利用碳排放影响因素及脱钩效应分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):382-390.[19]王桂波,南灵.陕西省耕地利用碳源/汇时空差异分析[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(2):245-249.[20]杨景成,韩兴国,黄建辉,等.土壤有机质对农田管理措施的动态响应[J].生态学报,2003,23(4):787-796.[21]张贵云,吕贝贝,张丽萍,等.黄土高原旱地麦田26年免耕覆盖对土壤肥力及原核微生物群落多样性的影响[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2019,27(3):358-368.[22]丁晋利,武继承,杨永辉,等.免耕对农田土壤有机碳及可溶性有机碳的影响[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报,2020,43(3)27-31.[23]丁磊,柴强,于爱忠,等.覆膜免耕对玉米间作豌豆农田土壤有机碳和氮的影响[J].西北农业学报,2021,30(8):1148-1156.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-03-01