|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Fertilization Measures on Soil Fertility and Soil Enzyme Activities in Loess Hilly Region

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年21
Page:
78-85
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Fertilization Measures on Soil Fertility and Soil Enzyme Activities in Loess Hilly Region
Author(s):
LIU Qiang1; 2; LI Miaomiao1; 3; HE Yalan1; LIANG Yan1; ZHANG Hongli1; XU Dehua4
(1.College of Resources and Environmental Engineering，Tianshui Normal University，Tianshui,Gansu 741000；2.Institute of Soil and Water Conservation，Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources，Yangling,Shaanxi 712100；3.Institute of Geographical Sciences，Xinjiang Normal University，Urumqi,Xinjiang 100049；4.School of Geography Science，Taiyuan Normal University，Jinzhong,Shanxi 030619)
Keywords:
organic manure; soil enzyme activity; redundancy analysis
PACS:
S 333
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20230040
Abstract:
The effects of five different fertilization measures (no fertilization (CK)，combined application of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer (NP)，combined application of nitrogen，phosphorus and potassium fertilizer (NPK)，single application of organic fertilizer (M) and combined application of organic fertilizer and nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer (MNP)) on soil enzyme activity and soil fertility were studied by field experiment with different fertilization soils as test materials，in order to solve the rational application of organic fertilizer in agricultural production in loess hilly area，reduce the amount of chemical fertilizer，improve the soil ecological environment，and provide reference for the sustainable development of agriculture.The results showed that fertilization significantly increased the soil nutrient content from 0 to 20 cm，and the soil fertility was more significantly increased under the treatment of organic fertilizer.In addition to soil water content，the nutrient content of soil 20-40 cm under different fertilization treatments was significantly lower than that of soil 0-20 cm.Fertilization significantly increased soil enzyme activity from 0 to 20 cm，and the highest enzyme activity was found under MNP treatment.Fertilization treatment had different effects on the enzyme activity of 20-40 cm soil，and the enzyme activity of 20-40 cm soil was significantly lower than that of 0-20 cm soil under different fertilization treatment.The application of organic fertilizer，especially the application of organic fertilizer combined with chemical fertilizer，could improve soil internal ecological environment，soil nutrient cycling capacity and soil enzyme activity，and should be one of the important measures for farmland production in loess hilly area.

References:

［1］刘强，穆兴民，王新民，等.长期不同施肥方式对旱地轮作土壤养分和作物产量的影响［J］.干旱地区农业研究，2021，39(3):122-128.［2］YOU M，LI L，TIAN Q，et al.Residue decomposition and priming of soil organic carbon following different NPK fertilizer histories［J］.Soil Science Society of America Journal，2020，84(6):1898-1909.［3］KAUR J，SANDHU S S，SHARMA S.Yield response of wheat grown under periodic heat stress imposed by using mini heat tents［J］.Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science，2021，207(2):285-303.［4］WU L，ZHANG W，WEI W，et al.Soil organic matter priming and carbon balance after straw addition is regulated by long-term fertilization［J］.Soil Biology & Biochemistry，2019，135:383-391.［5］李玥，张金池，李奕建，等.上海市沿海防护林下土壤养分、微生物及酶的典型相关关系［J］.生态环境学报，2010，19(2):360-366.［6］李俊强，林利华，张帆，等.施肥模式对茶树根际土壤微生物数量及酶活性的影响［J］.水土保持研究，2019，26(3):22-28.［7］李宽莹，王泽林，徐兴有，等.不同施肥处理对日光温室内土壤微生物数量与酶活性的影响［J］.西北林学院学报，2019，34(2):56-61.［8］周东兴，李磊，李晶，等.玉米/大豆轮作下不同施肥处理对土壤微生物生物量及酶活性的影响［J］.生态学杂志，2018，37(6):1856-1864.［9］王桂跃，苏婷，韩海亮，等.长期施肥对水田和旱地土壤微生物群落结构、活性碳氮及酶活性的影响［J］.浙江农业学报，2018，30(5):817-824.［10］谭军利，马永鑫，王西娜，等.生物有机肥替代氮肥对压砂西瓜生长、产量及品质的影响［J］.北方园艺，2022(7):30-38.［11］张迪，韩晓增，李海波，等.不同植被覆盖与施肥管理对黑土活性有机碳及碳库管理指数的影响［J］.生态与农村环境学报，2008，24(4):1-5.［12］王高飞，周鹏，王永平，等.伴矿景天间作方式对辣椒根围土壤镉迁移与有效性的影响［J］.中国生态农业学报(中英文)，2021，29(9):1604-1614.［13］苏旭，栾策，吴奇，等.生物炭对玉米/大豆、玉米/花生间作系统土壤水肥热及产量的影响［J］.生态学杂志，2021，40(1):115-122.［14］SINSABAUGH R L，MANZONI S，MOORHEAD D L，et al.Carbon use efficiency of microbial communities:Stoichiometry，methodology and modelling［J］.Ecology Letters，2013，16(7):930-939．［15］邓华，高明，龙翼，等.生物炭和秸秆还田对紫色土旱坡地土壤团聚体与有机碳的影响［J］.环境科学，2021，42(11):5481-5490.［16］陈鑫，刘勤，张刚.太湖地区不同轮作模式对土壤肥力和水稻产量的影响［J］.江苏农业学报，2021，37(4):874-883.［17］舒蛟靖，陈奇伯，王艳霞，等.华山松人工林土壤酶活性与理化因子的通径分析［J］.东北林业大学学报，2014，42(9):88-92，97.［18］濮阳雪华，王月玲，赵志杰，等.陕北黄土区不同植被恢复模式植被与土壤耦合关系研究［J］.草业学报，2021，30(5):13-24.［19］武际，郭熙盛，鲁剑巍，等.不同水稻栽培模式下小麦秸秆腐解特征及对土壤生物学特性和养分状况的影响［J］.生态学报，2013，33(2):565-575.［20］刘娇妹，李腾腾，张运龙，等.短期化肥减施后玉米产量的响应及其驱动因素分析［J］.中国土壤与肥料，2022(4):66-73.［21］夏皖豫，陈彦云，柴忠良，等.宁南山区膜下滴灌对马铃薯土壤酶活性、土壤养分及产量的影响［J］.干旱地区农业研究，2021，39(1):57-64.［22］邓健睿，杨艳波，娄婧，等.辽河上游森林土壤理化性质及持水能力研究［J］.土壤与作物，2021，10(4):449-459.［23］李花，葛玮健，马晓霞，等.小麦-玉米轮作体系长期施肥对土微生物量碳、氮及酶活性的影响［J］.植物营养与肥料学报，2011，17(5):1140-1146.［24］常换换，苏友波，范茂攀，等.红壤坡耕地玉米大豆间作的根际微生态效应［J］.山西农业大学学报(自然科学版)，2022，42(2):21-28.［25］刘晓宇，刘杨，冯彦房，等.水稻秸秆生物炭对渍害胁迫下稻麦轮作土壤的影响［J］.江苏农业科学，2021，49(5):211-215.［26］夏雪，谷洁，高华，等.不同配肥方案对(土娄)土酶活性和小麦产量的影响［J］.植物营养与肥料学报，2011，17(2):472-476.［27］杨寅，邱钰明，王中斌，等.重度火烧迹地兴安落叶松(Larix gmelinii)根际土壤真菌群落研究［J］.生态学报，2021，41(23):9399-9409.［28］康勇建，赵宝平，孙雯，等.化肥减施配合生物有机肥对土壤特性和燕麦产量的影响［J］.中国农学通报，2021，37(11):59-64.［29］张继光，秦江涛，要文倩，等.长期施肥对红壤旱地土壤活性有机碳和酶活性的影响［J］.土壤，2010，42(3):364-371.［30］王改玲，李立科，郝明德，等.长期施肥及不同施肥条件下秸秆覆盖、灌水对土壤酶和养分的影响［J］.核农学报，2012，26(1):129-134，27.［31］李猛，张恩平，张淑红，等.长期不同施肥设施菜地土壤酶活性与微生物碳源利用特征比较［J］.植物营养与肥料学报，2017，23(1):44-53.［32］LIU Q，MU X M，ZHAO G J，et al.Effects of fertilization on soil water use efficiency and crop yield on the loess plateau，China［J］.Applied Ecology and Environmental Research，2020，18(5):6555-6568.［33］柳燕兰，宋尚有，郝明德.长期定位施肥对黄绵土酶活性及土壤养分状况的影响［J］.土壤通报，2012，43(4):798-803.［34］刘恩科，赵秉强，李秀英，等.长期施肥对土壤微生物量及土壤酶活性的影响［J］.植物生态学报，2008，32(1):176-182.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-12-05