|Table of Contents|

Evaluation and Analiysis of Wild Sour Jujube Germplasm From West of Inner Mongolia

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年17
Page:
25-34
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Evaluation and Analiysis of Wild Sour Jujube Germplasm From West of Inner Mongolia
Author(s):
SUN Yaowen1; MA Yingmei1; WANG Shusen1; ZHANG Hongwu2; WEN Suyaletu3; QIN Sujuan4
(1.College of Desert Control Science and Engineering,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Desert Ecosystem Conservation and Restoration,State Forestry and Grassland Administration of China,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010011；2.Bayannur Forestry and Grassland Resources Protection Center,Bayannur,Inner Mongolia 015015；3.Wulatehou Qi Forestry and Grassland Bureau,Bayannur,Inner Mongolia 015543；4.Bayannur Forestry and Grassland Development Center,Bayannur,Inner Mongolia 015002)
Keywords:
Ziziphus acidojujuba C.Y.Cheng et M.J.Liu; germplasm; fruit characteristics; fruit nutrition; grey correlation analysis
PACS:
S 665.1
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20225198
Abstract:
Nine wild sour jujube (Ziziphus acidojujuba C.Y.Cheng et M.J.Liu) germplasm (N1-N9) from the western region of Inner Mongolia were used as experimental materials.Traits of three commercially available sour jujube from Shanxi,Shaanxi,Xinjiang Provinces and Jinsi jujube from Cangzhou city and Hebei Province were used as controls to compared with the experimental materials.Thirteen fruit phenotypic traits and four nutritional traits were tested,and high-quality fresh edible sour jujube germplasm were screened based on grey correlation analysis,in order to provide reference for the development and utilization of sour jujube germplasm in Inner Mongolia.The results showed that the quality of a single fruit of sour jujube was directly proportional to the transverse diameter of the fruit and the transverse diameter of the fruit pit;the highest fresh edible rate was N6 (68.55%),which was higher than Shaanxi (45.30%),but lower than Shanxi (77.35%),Xinjiang (82.33%),and Jinsi jujube (93.57%).The fruit flavor characters of N1,N3,N4,and N6 were more stable than those of the controls.N6 and N9 were favorable in sweet and sour fruit flavor.The soluble protein content of N4 (2.13 mg·g-1·FW) and N7 (2.19 mg·g-1·FW) was higher than that of the control.The germplasm that had highest soluble sugar content was N1 (208 mg·g-1·FW) which was lower than the control.N7(726 mg·（100g）-1·FW)had the highest vitamin C content which seven germplasm resources had higher vitamin C than the control.The germplasm had lowest titratable acid content was N6 (6.67%) which was higher than the control.Through the comprehensive evaluation using grey correlation analysis,N7 was suitable to be developed and utilized as an important breeding material for high-quality freshly edible sour jujube.

References:

［1］杨冲,李宪松,刘孟军.酸枣的营养成分及开发利用研究进展［J］.北方园艺,2017(5):184-188.［2］齐淑艳.酸枣嫁接大枣研究现状及存在问题［J］.中国林副特产,2021,175(6):111-112.［3］杨植,张川疆,杨芯芳,等.枣与酸枣杂交后代果实遗传倾向及混合遗传分析［J］.园艺学报,2023,50(1):36-52.［4］李登科,王永康,薛晓芳,等.我国枣种质资源研究利用进展［J］.果树资源学报,2021,2(1):1-6.［5］陈学森,王楠,张宗营,等.关于果树种质资源与遗传育种若干问题的理解与思考［J］.中国农业科学,2022,55(17):3395-3410. ［6］王力荣,吴金龙.中国果树种质资源研究与新品种选育70年［J］.园艺学报,2021,48(4):749-758.［7］顾云娇,赵晨辉,宋宏伟,等.穗醋栗种质资源表型多样性分析及鲜食资源评价［J］.植物遗传资源学报,2018,19(5):912-918. ［8］李登科等.枣种质资源描述规范和数据标准［M］.北京:中国农业出版社,2006.［9］王冬阁,冯正平,陈雪,等.酸枣种质资源表型性状的综合评价［J］.中药材,2019,42(6):1273-1276.［10］杨雷.酸枣种质资源果实营养成份分析及种质评价［D］.保定:河北农业大学,2004.［11］李登科,王永康,熊兴平,等.枣种质资源描述规范(NY/T2927)［S］.北京:中国农业出版社,2017.［12］田春娇,段艳军,刘志国,等.不同树形对枣枝叶生长及果实品质的影响［J］.北方园艺,2022(19):47-52.［13］郭丽红.植物生理生化实验指导［M］.成都:电子科技大学出版社,2021.［14］贾昊,李玲,曹兵.磁化水灌溉对设施灵武长枣生长与果实品质的影响［J］.核农学报,2019,33(11):2280-2286.［15］向建军,俞熙仁,董一帆,等.井冈蜜柚果实品质比较及综合评价［J］.中国果树,2022,229(11):39-47.［16］杨光华,王学林,曹明,等.基于灰色关联分析的西瓜品种综合评估［J］.北方园艺,2018(7):22-26.［17］ZHAO T,QUAN W,DU Z,et al.A comprehensive evaluation of pea germplasm resources through cluster and gray relational analyses［J］.Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution,2022,70(4):1135-1149.［18］WANG Z,YANG P,PENG H,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of 47 tea［Camellia sinensis (L.) O.Kuntze］germplasm based on entropy weight method and grey relational degree［J］.Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution,2021,68(8):3257-3270.［19］ZHANG C,HUANG J,YIN X,et al.Genetic diversity and population structure of sour jujube,Ziziphus acidojujuba［J］.Tree Genetics & Genomes,2014,11(1):1-12.［20］GUO M,ZHANG Z,LI S,et al.Genomic analyses of diverse wild and cultivated accessions provide insights into the evolutionary history of jujube［J］.Plant Biotechnol J,2021,19(3):517-531. ［21］张悦,索玉静,孙鹏,等.柿种质资源果实形态多样性分析［J］.园艺学报,2022,49(7):1473-1490.［22］李晓兰,丁雯,段慧竹,等.基于表型性状的酸枣种质资源表型多样性分析［J］.分子植物育种,2023,21(2):666-672.［23］孙亚强,吴翠云,王德,等.酸枣种质资源果实若干性状的多元统计分析［J］.江西农业学报,2015,27(12):29-32.［24］胡成成,陈林,银永安,等.膜下滴灌水稻品种灰色关联度分析与评价［J］.中国稻米,2016,22(6):76-79.［25］丁明亮,赵红,浦秋红,等.应用灰色关联度分析法对远缘杂交选育的小麦新品系评价［J］.西南农业学报,2018,31(2):217-222. ［26］邓杰,常国伟,孙丽芳,等.利用灰色关联度分析对35份玉米品系的综合评价［J］.黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2018,30(5):1-6.［27］昝凯,周青,张志民,等.灰色关联度和DTOPSIS法综合分析河南区域试验中大豆新品种(系)的农艺性状表现［J］.大豆科学，2018,37(5):664-671.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-10-24