|Table of Contents|

Effects of High Temperature Stress on the Growth and Physiology of Three Rhododendron Species

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年18
Page:
54-62
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of High Temperature Stress on the Growth and Physiology of Three Rhododendron Species
Author(s):
JIANG Jiancheng1; LIAO Juyang2; CAO Shoujin1; XU Ke1; WU Linshi2
(1.Central South University of Forestry & Technology,Changsha,Hunan 410004；2.Hunan Botanical Garden,Changsha,Hunan 410116)
Keywords:
high temperature stress;  Rhododendron; growth; physiology
PACS:
S 685.21
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20225177
Abstract:
Taking Rhododendron latoucheae,R.rivulare and R.molle as experimental materials,and an artificial climate incubator to simulate high temperature stress was used,the effects of different high temperature stress (14 hours day/10 hours night,control 25 ℃/21 ℃,mild stress 32 ℃/25 ℃,moderate stress 38 ℃/28 ℃,severe stress 42 ℃/31 ℃) on plant height,ground diameter,leaf relative water content,biomass,root shoot ratio,chlorophyll content,SOD activity,malondialdehyde content,soluble protein content and soluble sugar content of three species of Rhododendron were studied,in order to identify Rhododendron varieties with stronger heat resistance.The results showed that with the degree of high temperature stress increased,the plant height increment,ground diameter increment,leaf relative water content,and total biomass in the growth indicators of the three Rhododendrons showed a significant decrease,and the root shoot ratio showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing；SOD activity of the leaves of the three Rhododendrons showed a trend of gradual increase or first increase and then decrease,MDA content of the leaves of the three Rhododendrons showed a trend of gradual increase,chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b content of the leaves of the three Rhododendrons showed a trend of gradual decrease,soluble protein and soluble sugar content of the three Rhododendrons showed a trend of gradual increase or first increase and then decrease,compared with the control,there was an increasing trend overall.

References:

［1］陈慧颖,马石霞,郭鹏辉.热胁迫对植物生理影响的研究进展［J］.安徽农学通报,2021,27(5):11-13.［2］李小玲,雒玲玲,华智锐.高温胁迫下高山杜鹃的生理生化响应［J］.西北农业学报,2018,27(2):253-259.［3］费昭雪,刘莉丽,胡蝶,等.高温胁迫对西洋杜鹃理化指标的影响［J］.北方园艺,2018(8):102-105.［4］刘宇,宋希强,史佑海,等.高温胁迫下海南杜鹃和白花杜鹃的生理响应比较分析［J］.分子植物育种,2018,16(17):5827-5834.［5］庞新华,罗清,池昭锦.杜鹃耐热生理研究进展［J］.北方园艺,2016(13):192-195.［6］张娟,张正斌,谢惠民,等.小麦叶片水分利用效率及相关生理性状的关系研究［J］.作物学报,2005(12):1593-1599.［7］李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术［J］.植物生理学通讯,2000(4):487-488.［8］高俊凤.植物生理学实验指导［M］.北京:高等教育出版社,2006.［9］刘婉迪9个杜鹃品种对热胁迫的响应及其生理生化变化［D］.福州：福建农林大学,2018.［10］杨悦,罗新宁.高温胁迫对棉花叶绿素的影响［J］.农业与技术,2022,42(16):34-37.［11］宋磊,次仁央金,王小强,等.小麦对高温胁迫的响应机制研究进展［J］.中国农学通报,2021,37(36):6-12.［12］邹卉.高温干旱协同胁迫对杜鹃幼苗生长及生理特性的影响［D］.长沙：中南林业科技大学,2021.［13］杨华,宋绪忠,郑国良,等.高温胁迫对刺毛杜鹃生理特征和生长的影响［J］.江西农业大学学报,2020,42(2):259-265.［14］陆艾鲜,凌瑞,陈生煜,等.高温胁迫下8个绣球品种的生理生化响应［J］.热带作物学报,2022,43(4):816-828.［15］张琨,王琦,张玫云.高温胁迫时长对菜心幼苗生理指标的影响研究［J］.上海蔬菜,2021(4):77-79,85.［16］童琪,钟雁,李婧,等.不同温度对迷人杜鹃种子萌发与幼苗生长及生理特性的影响［J］.西北植物学报,2020,40(3):471-477.［17］冯欣洁,俞政男,郭和蓉,等.高温胁迫影响红掌生长发育的研究进展［J］.生态科学,2021,40(2):218-224.［18］赵冰雪,张永春,周琳,等.月季高温胁迫研究进展［J］.北方园艺,2021(10):124-131.［19］田佳,王辉,孙宇,等.高温胁迫对苹果叶片生理生化指标的影响［J］.北方园艺,2021(10):28-34.［20］耿兴敏,杨秋玉,郑福超,等.4种杜鹃幼苗高温胁迫下蛋白表达差异［J］.分子植物育种,2016,14(6):1574-1581.［21］ZHANG C T,XIE F C,YIN H,et al.Effect of drought stress on growth and water physiological characteristics of Poa sibirica［J］.Journal of Northeast Agricultural University,2021,28(1):24-30.［22］潘静霞,周余华,郑伊铃,等.多花梾木幼苗的耐高温性［J］.江苏农业科学,2021,49(14):133-137.［23］杨佳骏,吴永波,张燕红.高温与干旱胁迫对‘南林895杨’扦插苗生长和超微结构的影响［J］.林业科学,2020,56(5):176-183.［24］NOTUNUNU I,MOLELEKI L,ROOPNARAIN A,et al.Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on the molecular responses of maize under drought and heat stresses:A review［J］.Pedosphere,2022,32(1):90-106.［25］史小玲,薛立,任向荣,等.华南地区4种阔叶幼苗水分胁迫条件下的抗旱性初探［J］.林业科学研究,2011,24(6):760-767.［26］刘世鹏,刘济明,陈宗礼,等.模拟干旱胁迫对枣树幼苗的抗氧化系统和渗透调节的影响［J］.西北植物学报,2006(9):1781-1787.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-11-23